Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The spatial extent of producer service markets: Hierarchical models of interaction revisited

  • Published:
Papers in Regional Science

Abstract

The traditional view of interaction in spatial markets has been challenged by recent studies of producer service trade in the space economy. These studies find that although city-size and distance influence the direction and spatial extent of interaction, patterns of trade oftentimes counter expectations as trade flows up the urban hierarchy and across large distances. This paper seeks to determine whether the ownership structure of establishments contributes to deviations from the traditional model of hierarchical interaction. Using trade data obtained from surveys of 547 producer service establishments, patterns of trade originating from a five-tier urban hierarchy are examined empirically and evaluated using spatial survivor functions and logit models. The results indicate that the ownership structure of establishments contributes significantly to deviations from expected patterns of interaction. Independently owned establishments have smaller spatial markets and interact more often with smaller sized cities. Nonindependently owned establishments, in contrast, trade down and up the urban hierarchy in a manner much less sensitive to distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, J. and Nourse, H. 1988. Spatial Economic Interdependence in an Urban Hierarchy System.Journal of Regional Science 28: 421–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alao, N. et al. 1977.Christaller Central Place Structures: an Introductory Statement. Evanston, Il: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A. 1989. Getting on Your Bike: What Difference does a Migration History Make?Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie 80: 312–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. 1989. Communication Technology: For Better or for Worse? InThe Information Society, ed. J. Salvaggio. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, W. and Alvine, M. 1985. Export Services in Post-Industrial Society.Papers of the Regional Science Association 57: 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W. 1966.Central Places in Southern Germany. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, W. and Polèse, M. 1987. Trade and Location of Producer Services: A Canadian Perspective.Environment and Planning A 19: 597–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esparza, A. 1992. Small Manufacturing Firm Business Services Externalization in the Chicago Metropolitan Region.Urban Geography 13: 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esparza, A. and Krmenec, A. 1993. The Regional Geography of U.S. Business Services Growth, 1977–1987: Evidence and Policy Implications.Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies 5: 174–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esparza, A. and Krmenec, A. 1994a. Business Services in the Space Economy: A Model of Spatial Interaction.Papers in Regional Science 73: 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esparza, A. and Krmenec, A. 1994b. Producer Services Trade in City Systems: Evidence from Chicago.Urban Studies 31: 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fik, T. and Mulligan, G. 1990. Spatial Flows and Competing Central Places: Towards a General Theory of Hierarchical Interaction.Environment and Planning A 22: 527–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, L. 1992. Reading the Skyline of American Cities.Geographical Review 82: 180–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasmeier, A. and Borchard, G. 1989. Research Policy and Review 31. From Branch Plants to Back Offices: Prospects for Rural Services Growth.Environment and Planning A 21: 1565–1583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goe, W. 1991. The Growth of Produce Services Industries: Sorting Through the Externalization Debate.Growth and Change 22: 118–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. 1970. Urban Centrality and the Interweaving of Quaternary Activities.Ekistics 29: 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J. MacPherson, A. and Lombard, J. 1991. Interregional Trade in Producer Services: Review and Synthesis.Growth and Change 22: 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepworth, M. (1990)Geography of the Information Economy. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepworth, M. 1991. Information Technology and the Global Restructuring of Capital Markets. InCollapsing Space and Time: Geographic Aspects of Communications and Information, eds. S. Brunn and T. Leinbach. London: HarperCollins Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krmenec, A. 1994. The Structure of High-Order and vs. Low-Order Producer Services Markets Across a Hierarchy of Cities. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, San Francisco, CA.

  • Krmenec, A. and Esparza, A. 1989. Manufacturing and the Externalization of Services: A Theoretical Mode.Regional Science Perspectives 19: 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krmenec, A. and Esparza, A. 1993. Modeling Interaction in a System of Markets.Geographical Analysis 25: 354–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. 1982.Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D. and Hutton, T. 1987. Vancouver's Corporate Complex and Producer Service Sector: Linkages and Divergence Within a Provincial Staple Economy.Regional Studies 21: 413–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • LÖsch, A. 1954.The Economics of Location. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melody, W. 1991. New Telecommunications Networks and the Spatial Characteristics of Markets. InCities of the 21st Century, eds. J. Brotchie, M Batty, P. Hall, P. Newton. New York: Halsted Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalak, W. and Fairbairn, K. 1988. Producer Services in a Peripheral Economy.Canadian Journal of Regional Science 11: 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, G. 1984. Agglomeration and Central Place Theory: A Review of the LiteratureInternational Regional Science Review 9: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyelle, T. and Stanback, T. 1984.The Economic Transformation of American Cities. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odland, J. and Ellis, M. 1992. Variations in the Spatial Pattern of Settlement Locations: An analysis based on Proportional Hazards Models.Geographical Analysis 24: 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odland, J. and Shumway, J. 1993. Interdependencies in the Timing of Migration and Mobility Events.Papers in Regional Science 72: 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odland, J. and Bailey, A. 1990. Regional Out-Migration Rates and Migration Histories: A Longitudinal Analysis.Geographical Analysis 22: 158–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell, P. and Crouchley, R. 1987. Manufacturing Plant Closures: a Dynamic Survival Model.Environment and Planning A 19: 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. and Denike, K. 1970. Theoretical Problems in Central Place Analysis.Economic Geography: 46: 567–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. 1993. Supply Areas and optimal Spatial Structure.Journal of Regional Science 33: 167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. 1990. Business Services Specialization and Regional Economic Change.Regional Studies 24: 195–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porterfield, S. and Pulver, G. 1991. Exports, Impacts and Locations of Services Producers.International Regional Science Review 14: 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. 1971. Large-City Interdependence and the Preelectronic Diffusion of Innovation in the U.S.Geographical Analysis 3: 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. 1973. The Growth and Development of Systems of Cities in Advanced Economies. InSystems of Cities and Information Flows: Two Essays, A. Pred and G. Tornqvist, eds. Lund Series in Geography, Series B, 38.

  • Pred, A. 1974. Industry, Information and City-System Interdependencies. InSpatial Perspectives on Industrial Organization and Decision-Making, F. Hamilton, ed. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. 1977.City-Systems in Advanced Economies. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. 1972. Optimality in City Size, Systems of Cities and Urban Policy: A Skeptic's View.Urban Studies 9: 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, P., Weng, R., and Lin, G. 1993. The Spatial Separation of Parents and Their Adult Children.Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83: 656–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. 1987. The Industrial Purchase Decision for Professional Services.Journal of Business Research 15: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, E. 1941. A Theory of Location for Cities.American Journal of Sociology 46: 853–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Small Business Administration 1989.The State of Small Business: A Report to the President. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dinteren, J. 1987. The Role of Business-Service Offices in the Economy of Medium-Sized Cities.Environment and Planning A 19: 669–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Boventer, E. 1973. City Size Systems: Theoretical Issues, Empirical Regularities and Planning Guides.Urban Studies 10: 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldorf, B. and Esparza, A. 1991. A Parametric Failure Time Model of International Return Migration.Papers in Regional Science 70: 419–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J. 1986. Corporate Spatial Links With Financial Institutions: The Role of the

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and Regional Development and Planning Program, University of Arizona, 85721, Tucson, Arizona

    Adrian Esparza

  2. Department of Geography, Northern Illinois University, 60115, De Kalb, IN

    Andrew J. Krmenec

Authors
  1. Adrian Esparza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew J. Krmenec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esparza, A., Krmenec, A.J. The spatial extent of producer service markets: Hierarchical models of interaction revisited. Papers in Regional Science 75, 375–395 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02406759

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02406759

Keywords

Search

Navigation