Skip to main content
Log in

On the factors affecting strength of portland cement

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports mechanical property measurements for Portland Cement paste free from fabrication artifacts (e.g. bubble-type voids), and compares them to published results both for normal and new high strength cement. Removal of large voids (above 100μm) by vacuum de-airing leads to an increase of ∼ 15% in mean flexural strength and a small decrease in fracture toughness. This increase in flexural strength is predictable from the tied-crack model previously proposed to explain the notch-sensitivity behaviour of hardened cement paste, and for which direct experimental evidence was obtained. It is suggested that factors such as moisture content are at least as important as large voids in controlling mechanical properties. It is concluded that the much increased strength of the new polymer-containing cements must result from improvements to the microstructure other than the simple elimination of voids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. D. Birchall, A. J. Howard andK. Kendall,Nature 289 (1981) 388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. E. Bailey andD. D. Higgins,Nature 292 (1981) 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. D. Birchall, A. J. Howard andK. Kendall,ibid. 292 (1981) 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. D. Higgins andJ. E. Bailey,J. Mater. Sci. 11 (1976) 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Idem, Conference on Hydraulic Cement Pastes, Sheffield, Cement and Concrete Association, UK, 1976, 283–96.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. McN. Alford,Cem. Concr. Res. 11 (1981) 605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. N. McN. Alford, G. W. Groves andD. D. Double,ibid. 12 (1982) 349.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. D. Birchall, A. J. Howard andK. Kendall,J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1 (1982) 125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Idem, in “Engineering with Ceramics”, Proceedings of the British Ceramic Society No. 32, edited by R. W. Davidge (1982) pp. 25–32.

  10. Idem, Chem. Britain 18 (1982) 860.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. A. Helmuth andD. H. Turk, in “Structure of Portland Cement Paste and Concrete”, (SP90, Highways Research Board, 1966) pp. 135–44.

  12. M. Yudenfreund, I. Odler andS. BrunAuer,Cem. Concr. Res. 2 (1972) 313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Timoshenko, “Strength of Materials” (Van Nostrand, London, 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. F. Brown andJ. E. Srawley, ASTM STP 410 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Watson,Cem. Concr. Res. 8 (1978) 651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. M. Alexander,Nature 183 (1959) 885.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. D. Birchall, A. J. Howard andK. Kendall, UK Patent Application Nos. 8041640 (1980) and 8123103 (1981).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eden, N.B., Bailey, J.E. On the factors affecting strength of portland cement. J Mater Sci 19, 150–158 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02403121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02403121

Keywords

Navigation