Skip to main content
Log in

Party size and early detection of predators in sumatran forest primates

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theoretical considerations suggest that the ability to detect the presence or approach of a predator when there is still enough time to flee (early detection) should improve with group size, if group living is to be advantageous for individual non-human primates. The hypothesis that the distance at which forest primates detect predators increases with the size of their party was confirmed by observation. It was found that in addition to party size height (vegetation density) could also influence detection distance. Because height relates not only to visibility but also to the number of potential predators, one would predict that small parties are found higher in the canopy to compensate for the increased risk of predation. This prediction was confirmed using data on long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis).

The correlation found between party size and predation risk demonstrates that forest monkeys can adjust their behaviour in response to changes in predation risk, and hence support the hypothesis that predation risk has been an important, perhaps even the only, selective force responsible for the evolution of group living in non-human primates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. D., 1974. The evolution of social behavior.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 5: 325–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, S. A. &J. Altmann, 1970.Baboon Ecology. Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartles, M., 1929. Iets over het voedsel van de panter.De Tropische Natuur, 18: 81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram, B. C. R., 1978. Living in groups: predators and prey. In:Behavioural Ecology,J. R. Krebs &N. B. Davies (eds.), Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 64–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. &P. H. Harvey, 1977. Primate ecology and social organization.J. Zool. (London), 183: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D., 1971. Geometry and the selfish herd.J. Theor. Biol., 31: 295–311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland, J. L., 1981. The evolution of coloniality in white-tailed and black-tailed prairie dogs (Sciuridae:Cynomys leucurus andC. ludovicianus).Ecology, 62: 252–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &P. W. Sherman, 1976. Advantages and disadvantages of bank swallow (Riparia riparia) coloniality.Ecol. Monogr., 46: 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorde, L. B. &J. N. Spuhler, 1974. A statistical analysis of selected aspects of primate demography, ecology and social behaviour,J. Anthropol. Res., 30: 199–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler, P., 1955. Characteristics of some animal calls.Nature, 176: 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H. R., 1973. On the advantages of flocking.J. Theor. Biol., 38: 419–422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raemaekers, J. J. &D. J. Chivers, 1980. Socio-ecology of forest primates. In:Malayan Forest Primates,D. J. Chivers (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 279–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijksen, H. D., 1978.A Field Study on Sumatran Orang Utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelliLesson 1827):Ecology, Behaviour and Conservation. Veenman, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, T. E. &S. M. Richards, 1979. Reproductive strategies of some African monkeys.J. Mammal., 60: 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaik, C. P. van, M. A. van Noordwijk, R. J. de Boer & I. den Tonkelaar, in press. The effect of group size on time budgets and social behaviour in wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.

  • Schaller, G. B., 1967.The Deer and the Tiger. Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., 1956.Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. &F. J. Rohlf, 1969.Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, M., 1975. Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion.Anim. Behav., 23: 779–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vine, I., 1971. Risk of visual detection and pursuit by a predator and the selective advantage of flocking behaviour.J. Theor. Biol., 30: 405–422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waser, P. M., 1977. Feeding, ranging and group size in the mangabey,Cercocebus albigena. In:Primate Ecology,T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 183–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, A. J., 1980. The kloss gibbon in Siberut rain forest. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Cambridge.

  • Wrangham, R. W., 1980. An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups.Behaviour, 75: 262–300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

van Schaik, C.P., van Noordwijk, M.A., Warsono, B. et al. Party size and early detection of predators in sumatran forest primates. Primates 24, 211–221 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381083

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381083

Keywords

Navigation