Abstract
Primate population density often varies considerably between sites, reflecting differences in site conditions and resource availability. Understanding these differences may provide important insights for habitat management. We identified environmental variables that affect the population density of Callicebus coimbrai in forest patches throughout its geographic distribution in northeastern Brazil. We sampled the vegetation structure of 19 forest patches and assessed the composition of the surrounding landscape and the resistance of the surrounding matrix to the movement of C. coimbrai. We used the number of responses of C. coimbrai to playback to estimate the species density in each patch. The density of C. coimbrai was positively related to understory vegetation density, and tree diameter and density, but not to the surrounding landscape composition. The sites with the highest densities were concentrated in the center of the species geographic range and only one of the forest patches may be large enough to host a viable population of C. coimbrai over the long term. Denser understories and larger and closed-spaced trees were related to food availability, and possibly also to predator avoidance, although most predators were extirpated from the region. C. coimbrai tolerate and may even benefit from forest disturbance, depending on how the process has changed the vegetation structure. Our results emphasize the need to enhance the connectivity of the forest patches, particularly in the central portion of the species distribution. Our findings suggest that a whole-range approach is effective to identify the drivers of species density, and priority areas and conservation strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvares, C. A., Stape, J. L., Sentelhas, P. C., de Moraes Gonçalves, J. L., & Sparovek, G. (2013). Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22(6), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507.
Anderson, J., Cowlishaw, G., & Rowcliffe, J. M. (2007). Effects of forest fragmentation on the abundance of Colobus angolensis palliatus in Kenya’s Coastal Forests. International Journal of Primatology, 28(3), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-007-9143-7.
Arce-Peña, N. P., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Dias, P. A., Franch-Pardo, I., & Andresen, E. (2019). Linking changes in landscape structure to population changes of an endangered primate. Landscape Ecology, 34(11), 2687–2701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00914-8.
Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., & Dias, P. A. D. (2010). Effects of habitat fragmentation and disturbance on howler monkeys: a review. American Journal of Primatology, 72(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20753.
Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., & Fahrig, L. (2014). Why is a landscape perspective important in studies of primates? American Journal of Primatology, 76(10), 901–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22282.
Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., & Mandujano, S. (2006). Forest fragmentation modifies habitat quality for Alouatta palliata. International Journal of Primatology, 27(4), 1079–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-006-9061-0.
Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., González-Perez, I. M., Garmendia, A., Solà, M., & Estrada, A. (2013). The relative impact of forest patch and landscape attributes on black howler monkey populations in the fragmented Lacandona rainforest, Mexico. Landscape Ecology, 28(9), 1717–1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9929-2.
Barlow, J., Haugaasen, T., & Peres, C. A. (2002). Effects of ground fires on understorey bird assemblages in Amazonian forests. Biological Conservation, 105(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00177-X.
Bicca-Marques, J. C., & Heymann, E. W. (2013). Ecology and behavior of titi monkeys (genus Callicebus). In L. M. Veiga, A. A. Barnett, S. F. Ferrari, & M. A. Norconk (Eds.), Evolutionary Biology and Conservation of Titis, Sakis and Uacaris (pp. 196–207). Cambridge University Press.
Boinski, S. U. E., Kauffman, L., Westoll, A., Stickler, C. M., Cropp, S., & Ehmke, E. (2003). Are Vigilance, Risk from Avian Predators and Group Size Consequences of Habitat Structure? A Comparison of Three Species of Squirrel Monkey (Saimiri oerstedii, S. boliviensis, and S. sciureus). Behaviour, 140, 1421–1467. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853903771980666.
Bowman, J., Jaeger, J. A., & Fahrig, L. (2002). Dispersal distance of mammals is proportional to home range size. Ecology, 83(7), 2049–2055. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2049:DDOMIP]2.0.CO;2.
Brazil (2011). Plano de Ação Nacional para Conservação dos Primatas do Nordeste. ICMBio.
Brown, J., Mehlman, D., & Stevens, G. (1995). Spatial variation in abundance. Ecology, 76(7), 2028–2043. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941678.
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer.
Byrne, H., Rylands, A. B., Carneiro, J. C., Alfaro, J. W. L., Bertuol, F., da Silva, M. N., Messias, M., Groves, C. P., Mittermeier, R. A., Farias, I., Hrbek, T., Schneider, H., Sampaio, I., & Boubli, J. P. (2016). Phylogenetic relationships of the New World titi monkeys (Callicebus): first appraisal of taxonomy based on molecular evidence. Frontiers in Zoology, 13(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-016-0142-4.
Carretero-Pinzón, X. (2013). Population density and habitat availability of Callicebus ornatus, a Colombian endemic titi monkey. In T. R. Defler, P. R. Stevenson, M. L. Bueno, & D. C. Guzmán-Caro (Eds.), Especies de Primates Colombianos en Peligro de Extinción (pp. 160–169). Asociación Primatológica Colombiana.
Cavada, N., Tenan, S., Barelli, C., & Rovero, F. (2019). Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on primate density at the landscape scale. Conservation Biology, 33(4), 873–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13269.
Chagas, R. R. D., & Ferrari, S. F. (2010). Habitat use by Callicebus coimbrai (Primates: Pitheciidae) and sympatric species in the fragmented landscape of the Atlantic Forest of southern Sergipe, Brazil. Zoologia, 27(6), 853–860. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702010000600003.
Chagas, R. R. D., & Ferrari, S. F. (2011). Population parameters of the endangered titi monkey, Callicebus coimbrai Kobayashi and Langguth, 1999, in the fragmented landscape of southern Sergipe, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 71(3), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842011000400001.
Chapman, C., Chapman, L., Wangham, R., Hunt, K., Gebo, D., & Gardner, L. (1992). Estimators of fruit abundance of tropical trees. Biotropica, 24(4), 527–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389015.
Chapman, C. A., Gautier-Hion, A. N. N. I. E., Oates, J. F., & Onderdonk, D. A. (1999). African primate communities: determinants of structure and threats to survival. In J. G. Fleagle, C. H. Janson, & K. E. Reed (Eds.), Primate communities (pp. 1–37). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542381.002.
Chapman, C. A., Bortolamiol, S., Matsuda, I., Omeja, P. A., Paim, F. P., Reyna-Hurtado, R., Sengupta, R., & Valenta, K. (2018). Primate population dynamics: variation in abundance over space and time. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27(5), 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1489-3.
Cheyne, S. M. (2011). Gibbon locomotion research in the field: problems, possibilities, and benefits for conservation. In K. D’Août & E. E. Vereecke (Eds.), Primate Locomotion: Linking Field and Laboratory Research (pp. 201–213). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1420-0_11.
Cisneros-Heredia, D. F., León-Reyes, A., & Seger, S. (2005). Boa constrictor predation on a Titi monkey, Callicebus discolor. Neotropical Primates, 13(3), 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1896/1413-4705.13.3.11.
Costa-Araújo, R., Luis Regolin, A., Martello, F., Pedro Souza-Alves, J., Hrbek, T., & Cezar Ribeiro, M. (2021). Occurrence and conservation of the vulnerable titi monkey Callicebus melanochir in fragmented landscapes of the Atlantic forest hotspot. Oryx, 55(6), 916–923. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605319001522.
Cottam, G., & Curtis, J. T. (1956). The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology, 37(3), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930167.
Cristóbal-Azkarate, J., Veà, J. J., Asensio, N., & Rodríguez-Luna, E. (2005). Biogeographical and floristic predictors of the presence and abundance of mantled howlers (Alouatta palliata mexicana) in rainforest fragments at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. American Journal of Primatology, 67(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20178.
DeWalt, S. J., Maliakal, S. K., & Denslow, J. S. (2003). Changes in vegetation structure and composition along a tropical forest chronosequence: Implications for wildlife. Forest Ecology and Management, 182(1-3), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00029-X.
Emmons, L. H., Whitney, B. T., & Ross, D. L. (1997). Sounds of Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: An audio field guide. Library of Natural Sounds, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology.
Ewers, R. M., & Didham, R. K. (2006). Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews, 81(1), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006949.
Ferrari, S. F. (2009). Predation risk and antipredator strategies. In P. A. Garber, A. Estrada, J. C. Bicca-Marques, E. W. Heymann, & K. B. Strier (Eds.), South American Primates (pp. 251–277). Springer.
Flesher, K. M. (2015). The distribution, habitat use, and conservation status of three Atlantic Forest monkeys (Sapajus xanthosternos, Callicebus melanochir, Callithrix sp.) in an agroforestry/forest mosaic in Southern Bahia, Brazil. International Journal of Primatology, 36(6), 1172–1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-015-9884-7.
Fortin, M., & Dale, M. (2005). Spatial Analysis: A guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press.
Frankham, R. (2003). Genetics and Conservation Biology. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 326((Supplement 1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-0691(03)00023-4.
Gabriel, D. N., Gould, L., & Cook, S. (2018). Crowding as a primary source of stress in an endangered fragment-dwelling strepsirrhine primate. Animal Conservation, 21(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12375.
Galán-Acedo, C., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Cudney-Valenzuela, S. J., & Fahrig, L. (2019). A global assessment of primate responses to landscape structure. Biological Reviews, 94(5), 1605–1618. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12517.
Galán-Acedo, C., Spaan, D., Bicca-Marques, J. C., de Azevedo, R. B., Villalobos, F., & Rosete-Vergés, F. (2021). Regional deforestation drives the impact of forest cover and matrix quality on primate species richness. Biological Conservation, 263, 109338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109338.
Gestich, C. C., Caselli, C. B., Nagy-Reis, M. B., Setz, E. Z., & Cunha, R. G. (2017). Estimating primate population densities: The systematic use of playbacks along transects in population surveys. American Journal of Primatology, 79(2), e22586. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22586.
Gestich, C. C., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Saranholi, B. H., Cunha, R. G., Setz, E. Z., & Ribeiro, M. C. (2021). Forest loss and fragmentation can promote the crowding effect in a forest-specialist primate. Landscape Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01336-1.
Gouveia, S. F., Souza-Alves, J. P., de Souza, B. B., Beltrão-Mendes, R., Jerusalinsky, L., & Ferrari, S. F. (2017). Functional planning units for the management of an endangered Brazilian titi monkey. American Journal of Primatology, 79(5), e22637. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22637.
Hamard, M., Cheyne, S. M., & Nijman, V. (2010). Vegetation correlates of gibbon density in the peat-swamp forest of the Sabangau catchment, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology, 72(7), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20815.
Hanya, G., & Chapman, C. A. (2013). Linking feeding ecology and population abundance: a review of food resource limitation on primates. Ecological Research, 28(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-1012-y.
Hawes, J., Motta, C. D. S., Overal, W. L., Barlow, J., Gardner, T. A., & Peres, C. A. (2009). Diversity and composition of Amazonian moths in primary, secondary and plantation forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 25(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467409006038.
Heiduck, S. (2002). The use of disturbed and undisturbed forest by masked titi monkeys Callicebus personatus melanochir is proportional to food availability. Oryx, 36(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605302000200.
Hendges, C. D., Melo, G. L., Gonçalves, A. S., Cerezer, F. O., & Cáceres, N. C. (2017). Landscape attributes as drivers of the geographical variation in density of Sapajus nigritus Kerr, 1792, a primate endemic to the Atlantic Forest. Acta Oecologica, 84, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2017.08.007.
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25(15), 1965–1978. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276.
Hilário, R. R. (2013). Determinantes ambientais da densidade de Callicebus coimbrai em fragmentos florestais no nordeste brasileiro e implicações para a sua conservação. PhD Dissertation, Universidade Federal da Paraíba.
Hilário, R. R., Jerusalinsky, L., Santos, S., Beltrão-Mendes, R., & Ferrari, S. F. (2017). A primate at risk in Northeast Brazil: local extinctions of Coimbra Filho’s titi (Callicebus coimbrai). Primates, 58(2), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-017-0599-6.
Irwin, M. T. (2008). Feeding ecology of diademed sifakas (Propithecus diadema) in forest fragments and continuous forest. International Journal of Primatology, 29(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-007-9222-9.
Isbell, L. A. (1994). Predation on primates: ecological patterns and evolutionary consequences. Evolutionary Anthropology, 3(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.1360030207.
Jackson, H. B., & Fahrig, L. (2012). What size is a biologically relevant landscape? Landscape Ecology, 27(7), 929–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9757-9.
Jerusalinsky, L. (2013) Distribuição geográfica e conservação de Callicebus coimbrai Kobayashi & Langguth, 1999 (Primates – Pitheciidae) na Mata Atlântica do nordeste do Brasil. PhD Dissertation, Universidade Federal da Paraíba.
Jerusalinsky, L., & Souza-Alves, J. P. (2018). Callicebus comibrai. In ICMBio (Ed.), Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção: Volume II - Mamíferos (pp. 287–293).
Jerusalinsky, L., Souza-Alves, J. & Ferrari, S. (2020). Callicebus coimbrai. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T39954A17972422.en
Kinzey, W. G., & Robinson, J. G. (1983). Intergroup loud calls, range size, and spacing in Callicebus torquatus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 60(4), 539–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330600416.
Kulp, J., & Heymann, E. W. (2015). Ranging, activity budget, and diet composition of red titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus) in primary forest and forest edge. Primates, 56(3), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-015-0471-5.
Luna, A. G., Sanmiguel, R., Di Fiore, A., & Fernandez-Duque, E. (2010). Predation and predation attempts on red titi monkeys (Callicebus discolor) and equatorial sakis (Pithecia aequatorialis) in Amazonian Ecuador. Folia Primatologica, 81(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1159/000314948.
MapBiomas. (2019). Projeto MapBiomas – Coleção 5.0 da Série Anual de Mapas de Cobertura e Uso de Solo do Brasil. https://mapbiomas.org/. Accessed 4 Mar 2021.
Marsh, L. (2003). Wild zoos: conservation of primates in situ. In L. Marsh (Ed.), Primates in fragments: Ecology and conservation (pp. 365–379). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Marsh, C., Link, A., King-Bailey, G., & Donati, G. (2016). Effects of fragment and vegetation structure on the population abundance of Ateles hybridus, Alouatta seniculus and Cebus albifrons in Magdalena Valley, Colombia. Folia Primatologica, 87(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000443929.
McIntyre, N. E. (1995). Effects of forest patch size on avian diversity. Landscape Ecology, 10(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153826.
McRae, B. H. (2006). Isolation by resistance. Evolution, 60(8), 1551–1561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00500.x.
McRae, B. H., Dickson, B. G., Keitt, T. H., & Shah, V. B. (2008). Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 89(10), 2712–2724. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1861.1.
Morrissey, M. B., & Ruxton, G. D. (2018). Multiple regression is not multiple regressions: the meaning of multiple regression and the non-problem of collinearity. Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 10, 3. https://doi.org/10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0010.003.
Oliveira, V. B. D., Linares, A. M., Corrêa, G. L. C., & Chiarello, A. G. (2008). Predation on the black capuchin monkey Cebus nigritus (Primates: Cebidae) by domestic dogs Canis lupus familiaris (Carnivora: Canidae), in the Parque Estadual Serra do Brigadeiro, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 25, 376–378. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752008000200026.
Pinto, N., Lasky, J., Bueno, R., Keitt, T. H., & Galetti, M. (2009). Primate densities in the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil: The role of habitat quality and anthropogenic disturbance. In P. A. Garber, A. Estrada, J. C. Bicca-Marques, E. K. Heymann, & K. B. Strier (Eds.), South American Primates, Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects (pp. 413–431). Springer.
Pozo-Montuy, G., Serio-Silva, J. C., & Bonilla-Sánchez, Y. M. (2011). Influence of the landscape matrix on the abundance of arboreal primates in fragmented landscapes. Primates, 52(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-010-0231-5.
Price, E. C., & Piedade, H. M. (2001). Ranging behavior and intraspecific relationships of masked titi monkeys (Callicebus personatus personatus). American Journal of Primatology, 53(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2345(200102)53:2<87::AID-AJP4>3.0.CO;2-P
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 29 Feb 2020.
Reed, D. H., O'Grady, J. J., Brook, B. W., Ballou, J. D., & Frankham, R. (2003). Estimates of minimum viable population sizes for vertebrates and factors influencing those estimates. Biological Conservation, 113(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00346-4.
Rocha, J. G. (2011). Distribuição e densidade de populacões de Callicebus coimbrai Kobayashi & Langguth 1999, na região do Refúgio de Vida Silvestre Mata do Junco, Sergipe. Master’s Dissertation, Federal University of Sergipe
Sousa, M. C., Santos, S. S., & Valente, M. C. M. (2008). Distribuição e variação na pelagem de Callicebus coimbrai (Primates, Pitheciidae) nos estados de Sergipe e Bahia, Brasil. Neotropical Primates, 15(2), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1896/044.015.0208.
Souza, C. M., Shimbo, J. Z., Rosa, M. R., Parente, L. L., Alencar, A. A., Rudorff, B. F., Hasenack, H., Matsumoto, M., Ferreira, L. G., Souza-Filho, P. W. M., de Oliveira, S. W., Rocha, W. F., Fonseca, A. V., Marques, C. B., Diniz, C. G., Costa, D., Monteiro, D., Rosa, E. R., Vélez-Martin, E., et al (2020). Reconstructing three decades of land use and land cover changes in Brazilian biomes with Landsat archive and Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, 12(17), 2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172735.
Souza-Alves, J. P. & Ferrari, S. F. (2012). Unwanted homecoming: an adult male titi (Callicebus coimbrai) returns to its natal group. In International Primatological Society XXIV Congress (p. 661-661), Cancún: International Primatological Society.
Souza-alves, J. P., & Fontes, I. P. (2020). Anti-predator behavior of Coimbra-Filho’s titi monkeys (Callicebus coimbrai). Neotropical Primates, 26, 10–16.
Souza-Alves, J. P., Fontes, I. P., Chagas, R. R. D., & Ferrari, S. F. (2011). Seasonal versatility in the feeding ecology of a group of titis (Callicebus coimbrai) in the northern Brazilian Atlantic Forest. American Journal of Primatology, 73(12), 1199–1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20990.
Souza-Alves, J. P., Mourthé, Í., Hilário, R. R., Bicca-Marques, J. C., Rehg, J., Gestich, C. C., et al (2019). Terrestrial behavior in titi monkeys (Callicebus, Cheracebus, and Plecturocebus): potential correlates, patterns, and differences between genera. International Journal of Primatology, 40(4-5), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-019-00105-x.
Souza-Alves, J. P., Chagas, R. R. D., Santana, M. M., Boyle, S. A., & Bezerra, B. M. (2021). Food availability, plant diversity, and vegetation structure drive behavioral and ecological variation in Endangered Coimbra-Filho's titi monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 83, e23237. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23237.
Sugiura, N. (1978). Further analysis of the data by Akaike's information criterion and the finite corrections. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 7(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610927808827599.
Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielbörger, K., Wichmann, M. C., Schwager, M., & Jeltsch, F. (2004). Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography, 31(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x.
Traill, L. W., Bradshaw, C. J., & Brook, B. W. (2007). Minimum viable population size: a meta-analysis of 30 years of published estimates. Biological Conservation, 139(1-2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.011.
Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J. M., Rand, T. A., Didham, R. K., Fahrig, L., Batáry, P., Bengtsson, J., Clough, Y., Crist, T. O., Dormann, C. F., & Ewers, R. M. (2012). Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes-eight hypotheses. Biological Reviews, 87(3), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x.
van Kuijk, S. M., García-Suikkanen, C., Tello-Alvarado, J. C., Vermeer, J., & Hill, C. M. (2015). Estimating population density of the San Martin titi monkey (Callicebus oenanthe) in Peru using vocalisations. Folia Primatologica, 86(6), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442974.
Wagner, T. (2000). Influence of Forest Type and Tree Species on Canopy-Dwelling Beetles in Budongo Forest, Uganda. Biotropica, 32(3), 502–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00496.x.
Wagner, M., Castro, F., & Stevenson, P. R. (2009). Habitat Characterization and Population Status of the Dusky Titi (Callicebus ornatus) in Fragmented Forests, Meta, Colombia. Neotropical Primates, 16(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1896/044.016.0104.
Worman, C. O. D., & Chapman, C. A. (2006). Densities of two frugivorous primates with respect to forest and fragment tree species composition and fruit availability. International Journal of Primatology, 27(1), 203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-005-9007-y.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to CAPES for graduate stipends to RRH. JPS-A is supported by FACEPE (process: BFP 0149-2.05/19) and SFF by CNPq (process: 310852/2017-0). They thank Copener and the owners of the properties visited during this study. They also thank the Belo Horizonte zoo and Dalia for access to study titi monkey vocalizations. Thanks to Daniela Bitencurti Ruiz-Esparza (in memoriam) for her contributions to this study. We thank the anonymous reviewers for the valuable comments made on previous drafts of this manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by CNPq (Process: 303994/2011-8)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RRH developed the methodological procedures, conducted fieldwork, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. BM and JPSA gathered landscape data, and helped to write the manuscript. SFF provided editorial and academic advice and helped to write the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Joanna Setchell
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hilário, R.R., Moraes, B., Souza-Alves, J.P. et al. The Density of Callicebus coimbrai is Better Predicted by Vegetation Structure Variables than by Surrounding Landscape. Int J Primatol 45, 54–71 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-022-00278-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-022-00278-y