Skip to main content
Log in

Responses of plants to Al, Mn and Fe, with particular reference toSuccisa pratensis moench

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Succisa pratensis Moench is an ecologically wide-ranging hemicryptophytic plant species. The wide ecological amplitude is at least related to edaphic factors such as wide variation in soil pH from strongly acid to alkaline, and variation in soil wetness from aerobic to anaerobic. Al and Mn are generally considered important growth-limiting factors of many acid (sub) soils, whilst both reduced Mn and Fe are soluble and many reach phytotoxic concentrations when soil is oxygen-depleted after flooding.

The growth of young individuals of two populations from contrasted ecology was compared: one from a dry heath vegetation on acid podzol, and one from a waterlogged fen meadow vegetation on non-ripened raw peat with ripened top. Seedlings raised from fruits were grown on a complete nutrient solution situated in a controlled environment. Various concentrations of the microelements Al, Mn and Fe at high acidity (pH 3.8) were used separately.

It appeared that both populations showed the same response curve to concentrations of the three elements. Al did not differentiate between them, while the production of the waterlogged fen meadow population was less inhibited by either Mn or Fe compared to that of the dry heath population. These results may indicate that the wide ecological amplitude of this species is partly achieved by genetic differentiation into separate populations (edaphic ecotypes) as far as Mn and Fe are concerned. The study is used to evaluate generalization from experiments on genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity as adaptive responses to contrasting habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams A W 1955Succisa pratensis Moench. (Scabiosa succisa L.). J. Ecol. 43, 707–718.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams F 1974 Soil solution.In The Plant Root and its Environment. Ed. E W Carson, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville. pp 441–481.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antonovics J, Bradshaw A D and Turner R G 1971 Heavy metal tolerance in plants. Adv. Ecol. Res. 7, 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong W 1975 Waterlogged soils.In Environment and Plant Ecology. Ed. J R Etherington. Wiley, New York. pp 181–218.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bakker H de and Schelling J 1966 Systeem van Bodemclassificatie voor Nederland. Pudoc, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bascomb C L 1965 Rapid method for the determination of cation exchange capacity of calcareous and noncalcareous soils. J. Sci. Food Agric. 15, 821–823.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bradshaw A D 1965 Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Gen. 13, 115–155.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bradshaw A D, Chadwick M J, Jowett D, Lodge R W and Snydon R W 1960 Experimental investigations into the mineral nutrition of several grass species. III. Phosphate level. J. Ecol. 48, 631–637.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Britton H T S 1956 Hydrogen ions, Vol. 2. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 394–425.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brown J C and Jones W E 1977 Manganese and iron toxicities dependent on soybean variety. Comm. Soil. Sci. Plant Anal. 8, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chapin F S 1980 The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11, 233–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarkson D T and Hanson J B 1980 The mineral nutrition of higher plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31, 239–298.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellenberg H 1979 Indicator values of vascular plants in Central Europe. Scr. Geobot. 9 (revised 2nd edition).

  14. Foy C D, Chaney R L and White M C 1978 The physiology of metal toxicity in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 29, 511–566.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Foy C D and Campbell T A 1984 Differential tolerances of Amaranthus strains to high levels of aluminium and manganese in acid soils. J. Plant Nutr. 7, 1365–1388.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grime J P 1979 Plant species and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grime J P and Hodgson J G 1969 An investigation of the ecological significance of limechlorosis by means of large-scale comparative experiments.In Ecological Aspects of the Mineral Nutrition of Plants. Ed. I H Rorison. Blackwell, Oxford. pp 67–99.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grime J P and Hunt R 1975 Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. J. Ecol. 63, 393–422.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heukels H and Meijden R van der 1983 Flora van Nederland. 20th edition. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hewitt E J 1966 Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition. Commonw. Agric. Bur. Techn. Common. no. 22. (revised 2nd edition), Farnham Royal, Bucks, England.

  21. Hiesey W M and Milner H W 1965 Physiology of ecological races and species. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 16, 203–216.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoagland D R and Snyder W C 1933 Nutrition of strawberry plants under controlled conditions. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 30, 288–296.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hofstee J 1980 Analyse methoden. I. Grond. Rijksdienst voor de IJsselmeerpolders, Lelystad.

  24. Jones H E and Etherington J R 1970 Comparative studies of plant growth and distribution in relation to waterlogging. I. The survival ofErica cinerea L. andErica tetralix L. and its apparent relationship to iron and manganese uptake in waterlogged soil. J. Ecol. 58, 487–496.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kruijne A A, Vries D M de and Mooi H 1976 Bijdrage tot de oecologie van de Nederlandse graslandplanten. Versl. Landbouwkd. Onderz. 696; Mededed IBS 338, Wageningen.

  26. Lindsay W L 1979 Chemical equilibria in soils. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mather K 1953 The genetical structure of populations. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 7, 66–95.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McNaughton S J, Folson T C, Lee T, Park F, Price C, Roeder D, Schmitz J and Stockwell C 1974 Heavy metal tolerance inTypha latifolia without the evolution of tolerant races. Ecology 55, 1163–1165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Murphy J and Riley J P 1962 A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chem. 27, 31–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nelson L E 1983 Tolerance of 20 rice cultivars to excess Al and Mn. Agron. J. 75, 134–138.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ohki K 1984 Manganese deficiency and toxicity effects on growth, development, and nutrient composition in wheat. Agron. J. 76, 213–218.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pegtel D M 1983 Ecological aspects of a nutrient-deficient wet grassland (Cirsio-Molinietum). Verh. Ges. Ökol. 10, 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ramakrishnan P S 1968 Nutritional requirements of the edaphic ecotypes inMelilotus alba Medic. II. Aluminum and manganese. New Phytol 67, 301–308.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramakrishnan P S 1969 Nutritional factors influencing the distribution of the calcareous and acidic populations inHypericum perforatum. Can. J. Bot. 47, 175–181.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rorison I H 1968 The response to phosphorus of some ecologically distinct plant species. I. Growth rates and phosphorus absorption. New Phytol. 67, 913–923.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sissingh H A 1969 Die Lösung der Bodenphosphorsäure bei wässriger Extraktion in Verbindung mit der Entwicklung einer neuen P-Wasser-Methode. 23/11 Sonderheft zur Zeitschrift Landwirtschaftliche Forschung: 110–120.

  37. Small J (1946) pH and plants. Ballière, Tindall and Cox. London.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sparling J H 1967 The occurrence ofSchoenus nigricans L. in blanket bogs. II. Experiments on the growth ofS. nigricans under controlled conditions. J. Ecol. 55, 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Steinberg R A 1953 Symptoms of molybdenum deficiency in tobacco, Plant Physiol. 28, 319–322.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Steiner A A 1961 A universal method for preparing nutrient solutions of a certain desired composition. Plant and Soil 15, 134–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Steiner A A 1972 Plantenteelt zonder aarde. Landbouwkd. Tijdschr. 84, 428–436.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Turesson G 1922 The genotypical response of the plant to the habitat. Heriditas 3, 211–350.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Turner R G 1969 Heavy metal tolerance in plants.In Ecological Aspects of the Mineral Nutrition of Plants. Ed I H Rorison. Blackwell, Oxford. pp 339–410.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Westhoff V and Held A J den 1969 Plantengemeenschappen in Nederland. Thieme, Zutphen

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wieniger F M 1936 Nachtrag zur Schnellstickstoffbestimmungsmethode mit Silen als Beschleuniger. Wochenschr. Brauerei 53, 251–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pegtel, D.M. Responses of plants to Al, Mn and Fe, with particular reference toSuccisa pratensis moench. Plant Soil 93, 43–55 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02377144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02377144

Key words

Navigation