Skip to main content
Log in

The maximum likelihood approach to the identification of neuronal firing systems

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concern of this work is the identification of the (nonlinear) system of a neuron firing under the influence of a continuous input in one case, and firing under the influence of two other neurons in a second case. In the first case, suppose that the data consist of sample values Xt, Yt, t=0, ±1, ±2, ... with Yt=1 if the neuron fires in the time interval t to t+1 and Yt=0 otherwise, and with Xt denoting the (sampled) noise value at time t. Suppose that Ht denotes the history of the process to time t. Then, in this case the model fit has the form

$$Prob\{ Y_t = 1|H_t \} = \Phi (U_t - \theta )$$

where

$$U_t = \sum\limits_{u = 0}^{\gamma _t - 1} {a_u } X_{t - u} + \sum\limits_{u = 0}^{\gamma _t - 1} { \sum\limits_{\nu = 0}^{\gamma _t - 1} {b_{u,\nu } } X_{t - u} X_{t - \nu } } $$

where γ t denotes the time elapsed since the neuron last fired and ϕ denotes the normal cumulative. This model corresponds to quadratic summation of the stimulus followed by a random threshold device. In the second case, a network of three neurons is studied and it is supposed that

$$U_t = \sum\limits_{u = 0}^{\gamma _t - 1} {a_u } X_{t - u} + \sum\limits_{u = 0}^{\gamma _t - 1} {b_u } X_{t - u} $$

with Xt and Zt zero-one series corresponding to the firing times of the two other neurons. The models are fit by the method of maximum likelihood toAplysia californica data collected in the laboratory of Professor J.P. Segundo. The paper also contains some general comments of the advantages of the maximum likelihood method for the identification of nonlinear systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aidley, D.J. The Physiology of Excitable Cells. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, R.J.; Nelder, J.A. The GLIM System. Numerical Algorithms Group, 7 Banbury Road, Oxford, England, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brillinger, D.R.; Bryant, H.L.; Segundo, J.P. Identification of synaptic interactions. Biol. Cybernetics 22:213–228; 1976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brillinger, D.R. Maximum likelihood analysis of spike trains of interacting nerve cells. Technical Report No. 80. Statistics Dept., Berkeley, CA: University of California; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brillinger, D.R.; Segundo, J.P. Empirical examination of the threshold model of neuron firing. Biol. Cybernetics 35:213–220; 1979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bryant, H.L.; Ruiz-Marcos, A.; Segundo, J.P. Correlations of neuronal spike discharges produced by monosynaptic connexions and by common inputs. J. Neurophysiol. 36:205–225; 1973.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bryant, H.L.; Segundo, J.P. Spike initiation by transmembrane current: A white-noise analysis. J. Physiol. 260:279–314; 1976.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eccles, J.C. The Physiology of Nerve Cells. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hooper, M.J. Harwell Subroutine Library. Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell, England; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, Y.W.; Schetzen, M. Measurement of the kernels of a non-linear system by cross-correlation. Int. J. Control 2:237–254; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marmarelis, P.Z.; Marmarelis, V.Z. Analysis of Physiological Systems, New York, NY: Plenum, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCullogh, W.S.; Pitts, W.H. A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 5:115–133; 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rao, C.R. Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications, 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Segundo, J.P. La neurofisiologica: Algunos Supuestos y Bases, Recovecos e Implicaciones. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wiener, N. Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grant DMS-8316634.

Professor J.P. Segundo introduced me to the problems of the analysis of neuron spike trains, provided the data sets discussed and generally offered much help and encouragement. I cannot thank him enough. Ettore Marchetti prepared the noise data for computer analysis. The referees made many helpful and perceptive comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brillinger, D.R. The maximum likelihood approach to the identification of neuronal firing systems. Ann Biomed Eng 16, 3–16 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367377

Keywords

Navigation