Skip to main content
Log in

K-means clustering method for auditory evoked potentials selection

  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface auditory evoked potentials are generally recorded using a headset of 32, 64 or 128 electrodes, but the quality of the responses is quite heterogeneous on the scalp surface. In some contexts, such as the analysis of auditory evoked potentials recorded in radio-frequency fields, the signal quality is essential, and it appears pertinent to consider only a limited number of electrodes. Therefore, before analysing signals influenced by radio-frequency fields, it is necessary to consider the preliminary step of selecting the channels where auditory activity is strong. This step is often realised by human visual selection and can take a considerable time. In this paper, a simple k-means clustering method is proposed, to select automatically the important channels, and the results are compared with traditional methods of selection. The method detected channels that showed a concordance rate of 86.5% with the visual selection (performed by five individuals) and gave the same final selection (only two extra electrodes in the automatic case). Moreover, the time needed for this automatic selection was 100 times less than that for the visual selection, and also human variability was avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Donchin, E., andHeffley, E. F. (1976): ‘Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: a tutorial review’, inOtto, D. (Ed.): ‘Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research’ (US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 1976), pp. 555–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., andFlynn, P. J. (1999): ‘Data clustering: a review’,ACM Comput. Surveys,31, pp. 264–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maby, E., Chaillou, S., Marquis, P., andLe Bouquin-Jeannes, R. (2002): ‘Characterization of auditory evoked potentials recorded in radiofrequency fields’. XI European Signal Processing Conference, Toulouse, France

  • Raz, J., andTuretsky, B. (1998): ‘Event-related potentials’, in ‘Encyclopedia of biostatistics vol. 2’, (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1998), pp. 1407–1409

    Google Scholar 

  • Saporta, G. (1990): ‘Probabilités, analyse des données et statistique’, Technip

  • Shtyrov, Y., andPulvermuller, F. (2002): ‘Memory traces for inflectional affixes as shown by mismatch negativity’,Eur. J. Neurosci.,15, pp. 1085–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., andCastellan, N.J. Jr. (1988): ‘Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences’, International edn (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrandies, W. (1989): ‘Data reduction of multichannel fields: global field power and principal component analysis’,Brain Topogr.,2, pp. 73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., andDonchin, E. (1999): ‘A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array’,Psychophysiology,36, pp. 409–414

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Gourevitch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gourevitch, B., Le Bouquin-Jeannes, R. K-means clustering method for auditory evoked potentials selection. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 41, 397–402 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348081

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348081

Keywords

Navigation