Skip to main content
Log in

Data reduction of multichannel fields: Global field power and Principal Component Analysis

  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Electroencephalographic data recorded for topographical analysis constitute multidimensional observations, and the present paper illustrates methods of data analysis of multichannel recordings where components of evoked brain activity are identified quantitatively. The computation of potential field strength (Global Field Power, GFP) is used for component latency determination. Multivariate statistical methods like Principal Component Analysis (PCA) may be applied to the topographical distribution of potential values. The analysis of statistically defined components of visually elicited brain activity is illustrated with data sets stemming from different experiments. With spatial PCA the dimensionality of multichannel data is reduced to only three components that account for more than 90% of the variance. The results of spatial PCA relate to experimental conditions in a meaningful way, and this method may also be used for time segmentation of topographic potential maps series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chapman, R.M., McCrary, J.W., Bragdon, H.R. and Chapman, J.A. Latent components of event-related potentials functionally related to information processing. In: J.E.Desmedt (Ed.), Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology, Karger, Basel, 1979, Vol.6: 80–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donchin, E. A multivariate approach to the analysis of average evoked potentials. IEEE Trans. Bio-med. Engng., 1966: 13, 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donchin, E. and Heffley, E.F. Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: a tutorial review. In: D. Otto (Ed.), Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Event-Related Brain Potential Research Washington, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1978: 555–572.

  • Glaser, E.M. and Ruchkin, D.S. Principles of Neurbiological Signal Analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R.L. Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H.H. Modern Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harner, R. and Riggio, S. Application of Singular Value Decomposition to Topographic Analysis of Flash-Evoked Potentials. Brain Topography, this issue.

  • Hjorth, B. Eigenvectors and eigenfunctions in spatio-temporal EEG analysis. Brain Topography, this issue.

  • John, E.R., Ruchkin, D.S. and Vidal, J.J. Measurement of eventrelated potentials. In: E. Callaway, R. Tueting, and S.H. Koslow (Eds), New York, Academic Press, 1978: 93–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D. and Skrandies, W. Multichannel mapping of spatial distributions of scalp potential fields evoked by checkerboard reversal to different retinal areas. In: D. Lehmann and E.Callaway (Eds.), Human Evoked Potentials: Applications and Problems. Plenum Press, New York, 1979: 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D. and Skrandies, W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1980, 48: 609–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D. and Skrandies, W. Time segmentation of evoked potentials (EPs) based on spatial scalp field configuration in multichannel recordings. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, Suppl. 38: 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möcks, J. and Verleger, R. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: a note on misallocation of variance. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 65: 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rösler, F. and Manzey, D. Principal components and varimaxrotated components in event-related potential research: some remarks on their interpretation. Biol. Psychol., 1981 13: 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrandies, W. Latent components of potentials evoked by visual stimuli in different retinal locations. Int. J. Neurosci., 1981, 14: 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrandies, W. Visual evoked potential topography: methods and results. In: F.H. Duffy (Ed.), Topographic Mapping of Brain Electrical Activity, Butterworths, Boston, 1986: 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrandies, W. The upper and lower visual field of man: electrophysiological and functional differences. Progress in Sensory Physiology, 1987, 8: 1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrandies, W. Time range analysis of evoked potential fields. Brain Topography, 1988, 1: 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrandies, W. and Lehmann, D. Spatial principal components of multichannel maps evoked by lateral visual half-field stimuli. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1982, 54: 662–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrandies, W., Chapman, R.M., McCrary, J.W. and Chapman, J.A. Distribution of latent components related to information processing. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1984, 425: 271–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrandies, W., Dodt, E., Kofmel, B.A. and Michel, Ch. Scalp potential field topography evoked by lateralized dynamic random-dot stereograms. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 1989, Suppl. 30: 515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C.C. and McCarthy, G. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: simulation studies demonstrate misallocation of variance across components. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1984, 59: 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Acknowledgements: Part of the experimental work described in this paper has been supported by F. Lawrenz, nbn Medizin-Elektronik/Biologic Systems Corp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skrandies, W. Data reduction of multichannel fields: Global field power and Principal Component Analysis. Brain Topogr 2, 73–80 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128845

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128845

Keywords

Navigation