Skip to main content
Log in

Contexts as switchmen: The variable effects of formal and informal instructional strategies on student achievement

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents an exploratory theoretical framework that analyzes the extent by which the contexts of classroom instruction mediate the effects of instructional strategies on achievement. The study first presents the two main tasks that teachers face in classrooms-teaching, and controlling the social order. The study then elaborates on formal and informal instructional strategies that teachers use to manage these tasks. The main foci of the study is to show that the effects of these different instructional strategies on student achievements vary by grade level. The results suggest that the contexts of instruction determine the magnitude and direction of the effects of instructional strategies on achievement. Positive effects on student achievement appear when a functional congruence occurs between teachers' instructional strategies and the contexts wherein they are used. The analyses suggest that changes in the cognitive, social, and institutional contexts of classrooms may change the relative efficacy of specific instructional strategies. Consequently, researchers should pay more attention to the changes in the sociology of classrooms during students' school careers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballantine, J.H. (1989).The Sociology of Education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, Rebecca, & Dreeben, Robert (1983).How Schools Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, Neville (1976).Teaching Styles and Pupil Progress. London: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell, Charles E. (1970). Students and schools: some observations on client trust in client-serving organizations. In W.R. Rosengern & M. Leftor (Eds.),Organizations and Clients. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merill, pp. 37–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell, Charles E. & Kasarda, John D. (1980). Conceptualizing and measuring the effects of school and schooling.American Journal of Education,88(4), 401–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, Alan (1988).Informal Primary Education Today. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, Steven T. (1979).Tasks and Social Relationships in Classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, Anthony S., & Raudenbush, Stephen W. (1992).Hierarchical Linear Models. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S., Hoffer, Thomas, & Kilgore, Sally, (1982).High School Achievement. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, Linda, Ancess, Jacqueline, & Falk, Beverly, (1995).Authentic Assessment in Action. New York: Teachers College Record.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John (1938).Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPrette, Thomas A. & Forristal, Jerry D. (1994). Multilevel models: methods and substance.Annual Review of Sociology,20, 331–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Walter (1986). Academic work. In T.M. Tomlinson & H.J. Walberg (Eds.),Academic Work and Educational Excellence. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, pp. 175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddy, Gary D. (1988). High school order and academic achievement.American Journal of Education,96(4), 496–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, Maurice & Williamson, John (1992).Group Work in the Primary Classroom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammage, Philip (1988). Primary school practice beyond Plowden. In A. Blyth (Ed.),Informal Primary Education Today. London: Falmer, pp. 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamoran, Adam (1992). The variable effects of high school tracking.American Sociological Review,57(6), 812–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Harvey (1987).Multi-Level Models in Social and Educational Research. London: Griffin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, John (1983).A Place Called School. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, Richard M. (1993). Loosely coupled organizations revisited.Research in the Sociology of Organizations,11, 81–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane, R. (1988). Multicode organizations: A conceptual framework for the analysis of boarding schools.Sociology of Education,61, 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeves, J.P. & Sellin, N. (1988). Multilevel analysis. In J.P. Keeves (Ed.),Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: An International Handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 689–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, Fred N. (1958). Progressivism and traditionalism: Basic educational attitudes.School Review,66(1), 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, Tracy (1989).Among Schoolchildren. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, Chen-Lin C. & Kulik, James A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta analysis of evaluation findings.American Educational Research Journal,19(3), 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, Dan C. (1975).Schoolteacher- A Sociological Study. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, Jay (1987).Ain't no Makin' it. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcot (1959). The School class as a social system: Some of its functions in American Society.Harvard Educational Review,29(4), 297–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Tammar, Yair, Gad & Kahane, Reuven, (1989). Tutorial relations-the dynamics of social contract and personal trust.Interchange,20(1), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, Stephen W. & Bryk, Anthony (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects.Sociology of Education,59(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, Susan J. (1989). Workplace conditions that effect teacher quality and commitment: Implications for teacher induction programs.The Elementary School Journal,89(4), 421–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shye, Shmuel (1990). Smallest space analysis. In J.P. Keeves (Ed.),Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: An International Handbook. Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 747–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, Robert E. (1985).Learning to Cooperate, Cooperating to Learn. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, Robert E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A bestevidence synthesis.Review of Educational Research,57(3), 293–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, David L., Schiller, Katherin S., and Schneider, Barbara (1994). Sequences of Opportunities for Learning.Sociology of Education,67(3), 184–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Times, January 26, 1996 (London-On Line Edition).

  • Waller, Willard (1932).The Sociology of Teaching. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, Paul (1977).Learning to Labour. Hants: Saxon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, David (1988).How Children Think and Learn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, Peter (1979).The Divided School. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yair, Gad (1991). The indice of entitlement-three paradoxes, and empirical analysis. Notes on educational policy in the nineties,”Megamot,34(1), 5–26 (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yair, Gad (1997a). Implications of within school variability: An Israeli comparative study.Assessment in Education,4(2), 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yair, Gad (1997b). Teachers' polarisation in heterogeneous classrooms and the social distribution of achievement: An Israeli case study.Teaching and Teacher Education,13(3).

  • Yair, Gad & Khatab, Nabil, (1995). Changing of the guards: Teacher-student interaction in the intifada.Sociology of Education, 68(2), 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiping, Lou, Abrami, Philip C., Spence, John C., Poulsen, Cathryn, Chambers, Bette, & d'Appollonia Sylvia (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis.Review of Educational Research,66(4), 423–458.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gad Yair.

Additional information

This study was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship from the Fulbright Foundation and by a small research grant from The Spencer Foundation. My wholehearted appreciation is given to the support I received from the Foundations. I am especially grateful to Charles Bidwell from the University of Chicago, who encouraged me to pursue this study during my post-doctoral visit in 1994–95. Discussions with Benjamin Wright and his warm support have been more than essential. The hospitality and the academic environment at the NORC and the University of Chicago have done wonders to the fruition of ideas advanced in this study. Yechezkel Dar and Ruth Butler made suggestions to the improvement of this article. Daniel Shalem and Rivka Berman assisted with editorial as well as substantive comments. The reviewers ofSocial Psychology of Education insightfully suggested ways to improve the final version.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yair, G. Contexts as switchmen: The variable effects of formal and informal instructional strategies on student achievement. Social Psychology of Education 1, 269–295 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02339893

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02339893

Key words

Navigation