Abstract
In this paper it will be shown that a certain class of constrained latent class models may be interpreted as a special case of nonparametric multidimensional item response models. The parameters of this latent class model will be estimated using an application of the Gibbs sampler. It will be illustrated that the Gibbs sampler is an excellent tool if inequality constraints have to be taken into consideration when making inferences. Model fit will be investigated using posterior predictive checks. Checks for manifest monotonicity, the agreement between the observed and expected conditional association structure, marginal local homogeneity, and the number of latent classes will be presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, J. H. (1992). Bayesian estimation of normal ogive item response curves using Gibbs sampling.Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 251–269.
Casella, G., & George, E. (1992). Explaining the Gibbs sampler.American Statistican, 46, 167–174.
Croon, M. A. (1990). Latent class analysis with ordered latent classes.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 171–192.
Croon, M. A. (1991). Investigating Mokken scalability of dichotomous items by means of ordinal latent class analysis.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 315–331.
Ellis, J. L., & van den Wollenberg, A. L. (1993). Local homogeneity in latent trait models. A characterization of the homogeneous monotone IRT model.Psychometrika, 58, 417–429.
Gelfand, A. E., Hills, S. E., Racine-Poon, A., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Illustration of Bayesian inference in normal data models using Gibbs sampling.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 972–985.
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (1995).Bayesian Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
Gelman, A., Meng, X., & Stern, H. S. (in press). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies (with discussion).Statistica Sinica. to appear.
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences.Statistical Science, 7, 457–511.
Grayson, D. A. (1988). Two-group classification in latent trait theory: scores with monotone likelihood ratio.Psychometrika, 53, 383–392.
Holland, P. W. (1981). When are item response models consistent with observed data.Psychometrika, 46, 79–92.
Holland, P. W., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models.The Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523–1543.
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure.Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
Junker, B. W. (1991). Essential independence and likelihood-based ability estimation for polytomous items.Psychometrika, 56, 255–278.
Junker, B. W. (1993). Conditional association, essential independence and monotone unidimensional item response models.The Annals of Statistics, 3, 1359–1378.
Lindsay, B., Clogg, C. C., & Grego, J. (1991). Semiparametric estimation in the Rasch model and related exponential response models, including a simple latent class model for item analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 96–107.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968).Statistical theory of mental test scores. London: Addison-Wesley.
MacEachern, S. N., & Berliner, L. M. (1994). Subsampling the Gibbs sampler.The American Statistician, 48, 188–190.
Meng, X. L. (1994). Posterior Predictivep-Values.The Annals of Statistics, 22, 1142–1160.
Mokken, R. J. (1971).A theory and procedure of scale analysis. The Hague/Berlin: Mouton/DeGruyler.
Mokken, R. J., and, Lewis, C. (1982). A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses.Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 417–430.
Molenaar, I. W. (1996). Nonparametric models for polytomous responses. In W. J. van der Linden, & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.),Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (pp. 361–372). New York: Springer.
Molenaar, I. W., Debets, P., Sijtsma, K., & Hemker, B. T. (1994).User's Manual MSP. Groningen: IecProgamma.
NAG (1992). Foundation library. Oxford: The Numerical Algorithms Group.
Narayanan, A. (1990). Computer generation of Dirichlet random vectors.Journal of Statistical Computations and Simulations, 36, 19–30.
Ripley, B. D. (1987).Stochastic Simulation. New York: Wiley.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumptions of item response theory.Psychometrika, 49, 425–435.
Rubin, D. B. (1984). Bayesian justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician.The Annals of Statistics, 12, 1151–1172.
Rubin, D. B., & Stern, H. L. (1993). Testing in latent class models using a posterior predictive check distribution. In A. von Eye & C. Clogg (Eds.),Latent variables Analysis. Applications for Developmental Research. London: SAGE.
Sanders, K, & Hoijtink, H. (1992). Androgynie bestaat (Persons who are both psychologically masculine and feminine exist).Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 47, 123–133.
Shaffer, J. P. (1994). Multiple hypothesis testing: A review. (Tech. Rep. No. 23). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Statistical Sciences.
Shealy, R., & Stout, W. (1993). A model based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF.Psychometrika, 58, 159–194.
Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (1987). Reliability of test scores in nonparametric item response theory.Psychometrika, 52, 79–97.
Smith, A. F. M., & Roberts, G. O. (1993). Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 55, 2–23.
Stout, W. (1987). A nonparametric approach for assessing the latent trait dimensionality.Psychometrika, 52, 589–618.
Stout, W. F. (1990). A new item response theory modelling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation.Psychometrika, 55, 293–326.
Tanner, M. A. (1993).Tools for statistical inference, methods for the explorations of posterior distributions and likelihood functions. New York: Springer.
Tierney, L. (1994). Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions (with discussion).Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701–1762.
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1988). Use of item response theory in the study of group differences in trace lines. In H. Wainer, & H. I. Braun (Eds.).Test validity (pp. 147–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zeger, S. L., and Karim, M. R. (1991). Generalized linear models with random effect; a Gibbs sampling approach.Journal of the American statistical association, 86, 79–86.
Zellner, A., & Min, C. (1995). Gibbs sampler convergence criteria.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 921–927.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is supported by grant S40-645 of the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hojtink, H., Molenaar, I.W. A multidimensional item response model: Constrained latent class analysis using the gibbs sampler and posterior predictive checks. Psychometrika 62, 171–189 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295273
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295273