Abstract
The stochastic subject formulation of latent trait models contends that, within a given subject, the event of obtaining a certain response pattern may be probabilistic. Ordinary latent trait models do not imply that these within-subject probabilities are identical to the conditional probabilities specified by the model. The latter condition is called local homogeneity. It is shown that local homgeneity is equivalent to subpopulation invariance of the model. In case of the monotone IRT model, local homogeneity implies absence of item bias, absence of item specific traits, and the possibility to join overlapping subtests. The following characterization theorem is proved: the homogeneous monotone IRT model holds for a finite or countable item pool if and only if the pool is experimentally independent and pairwise nonnegative association holds in every positive subpopulation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Billingsley, P. (1979).Probability and measure. New York: Wiley.
Cook, D. C., & Campbell, D. T. (1979).Quasi-experimentation. Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Ellis, J. L. (1992).Subpopulation invariance and covariance matrices. Unpublished manuscript.
Holland, P. W. (1981). When are item response models consistent with observed data?Psychometrika, 46, 79–92.
Holland, P. W. (1990). On the sampling theory foundations of item response theory models.Psychometrika, 55, 577–601.
Holland, P. W., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models.The Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523–1543.
Lord, F. M. (1980).Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968).Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Mokken, R. J. (1971).A theory and procedure of scale-analysis. The Hague: Mouton.
Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Nielson & Lydiche.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumptions of item response theory.Psychometrika, 49, 425–435.
Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity.Econometrika, 57, 571–587.
Spearman, C. (1927).The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan.
Stout, W. (1987). A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionality.Psychometrika, 52, 589–617.
Stout, W. (1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation.Psychometrika, 55, 293–325.
van den Wollenberg, A. L. (1982). Two new test statistics for the Rasch model.Psychometrika, 47, 123–139.
Wakker, P. P. (1989).Additive representations of preferences. A new foundation of decision analysis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Dutch Interuniversity Graduate School of Psychometrics and Sociometrics. The authors wish to thank two reviewers for their thorough comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellis, J.L., van den Wollenberg, A.L. Local homogeneity in latent trait models. A characterization of the homogeneous monotone irt model. Psychometrika 58, 417–429 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294649
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294649