Skip to main content
Log in

A multistage ranking model

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a (n−1)2 parameter, multistage ranking model, which represents a generalization of Luce's model. We propose then×n item-rank relative frequency matrix (p-matrix) as a device for summarizing a set of rankings. As an alternative to the traditional maximum likelihood estimation, for the proposed model we suggest a method which estimates the parameters from thep-matrix. An illustrative numerical example is given. The proposed model and its differences from Luce's model are briefly discussed. We also show some specialp-matrix patterns possessed by the Thurstonian models and distance-based models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babington-Smith, B. (1950). Discussion of Professor Ross' paper.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 12, 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs.Biometrika, 39, 324–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchlow, D. E., Fligner, M. A., & Verducci, J. S. (1991). Probability models on Rankings.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 35, 294–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. E. (1950). Rank correlation and population models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 171.

  • Diaconis, P. (1988).Group representations in probability and statistics. Hayward: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligner, M. A., & Verducci, J. S. (1986). Distance based ranking models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 48, 359–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M (1940). A comparison of alternative tests of significance for the problem ofm rankings.Annuals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G. (1948).Rank correlation methods. London: Charles Griffin and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G. (1950). Discussion on symposium on ranking methods.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 12, 189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1959).Individual choice behavior. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallows, C. L. (1957). Non-null ranking models. I.Biometrika, 44, 114–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F. (1951). Remarks on the method of paired comparisons, I: The least squares solution assuming equal standard deviations and equal correlations.Psychometrika, 16, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schucany, W. R. & Frawley, W. H. (1973). A rank test for two group concordance.Psychometrika, 38, 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things.American Journal of Psychology, 15, 88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 34, 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yellott, J.I., Jr. (1977). The relationship between Luce's choice axiom, Thurstone's theory of comparative judgment, and the double exponential distribution.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 109–144.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Liqun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liqun, X. A multistage ranking model. Psychometrika 65, 217–231 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294375

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294375

Key words

Navigation