Abstract
A method of studying the problem of correction for guessing and other problems associated with behavior in the test situation is described and an illustrative example presented. As far as the writers are aware this method of approach is novel but, at the same time, it covers many of the practical and theoretical points raised by other writers as reviewed in the introduction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davis, F. B. Item analysis in relation to educational and psychological testing.Psychol. Bull., 1952,49, 97–121.
Granich, L. A technique for experimentation on guessing in objective tests.J. educ. Psychol., 1931,22, 145–156.
Gulliksen, H.Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley, 1950.
Holzinger, K. J. On scoring multiple response tests.J. educ. Psychol., 1924,15, 445–447.
Horst, A. P. The chance element in the multiple choice item.J. gen. Psychol., 1932,6, 209–211.
Horst, A. P. The difficulty of a multiple choice test item.J. educ. Psychol., 1933,24, 229–232.
Stanley, J. C. “Psychological” correction for chance.J. exp. Educ., 1954,22, 297–298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to acknowledge help received during discussions with Dr. Frederic M. Lord and Professor S. S. Wilks.
The death of Mrs. Vera T. Brownless on May 16, 1957, is regretfully announced.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brownless, V.T., Keats, J.A. A retest method of studying partial knowledge and other factors influencing item response. Psychometrika 23, 67–73 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288980
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288980