Skip to main content
Log in

Etodolac: Analgesic effects in musculoskeletal and postoperative pain

  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Numerous clinical trials have shown etodolac to be an effective analgesic. The purpose of the present report is to review results of 14 studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of etodolac in a variety of painful conditions. Presented are the results of four postsurgical pain studies, one study of acute gouty arthritis and nine studies of acute musculoskeletal disorders: acute low back pain, acute painful shoulder, tendinitis and bursitis, and acute sports injuries. A single oral dose of etodolac (25, 50, 100, 200, or 400 mg) was compared with aspirin (650 mg) or a combination of acetaminophen (600 mg) plus codeine (60 mg) for the relief of pain up to 12 h following oral, urogenital or orthopedic surgery. In multiple dose studies of acute gouty arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions, etodolac 200 or 300 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) or 200 mg three times a day (t.i.d.) was compared with naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. or t.i.d., diclofenac 50 mg b.i.d. or t.i.d., and piroxicam 20 or 40 mg once a day (o.d.) administered over 5 to 14 days. The efficacy of etodolac was at least equal and in some ways superior to aspirin and acetaminophen plus codeine in the relief of postsurgical pain. In studies of acute gouty arthritis, significant improvement from baseline were seen for all efficacy parameters evaluated for both the etodolac- and naproxen-treated patients. All the present studies of musculoskeletal conditions have shown etodolac to be effective and comparable in analgesic efficacy to naproxen, diclofenac or piroxicam. In summary, etodolac therapy for pain following surgery, in acute gouty arthritis and in acute musculoskeletal conditions resulted in analgesia comparable to that provided by several well-established analgesic or anti-inflammatory agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bacon PA (1990) An overview of the efficacy of etodolac in arthritic disorders. Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm 10: 22–34

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gaston GN, Mallow RD, Frank JE (1989) The efficacy of etodolac compared with aspirin and placebo in patients with pain following oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 42: 362–366

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hutton C (1983) The effectiveness of 100 and 200 mg etodolac, aspirin, and placebo in patients with pain following oral surgery. Oral Surg 56: 575–580

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedrich E (1983) A comparison of etodolac (Ultradol®) with aspirin and placebo in patients with episiotomy pain. Curr Ther Res 33: 100–107

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russell A (1983) Twelve-week study of etodolac, aspirin, and placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Ther 5: 436–444

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards W (1983) Etodolac, aspirin, and placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-week study. Clin Ther 5: 495–503

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon GV, Polsky BG (1983) Three-month trial of etodolac (Ultradol®) compared with aspirin and placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Ther Res 33: 89–99

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andelman SY (1983) Etodolac, aspirin, and placebo in patients with degenerative joint disease: a twelve-week study. Clin Ther 5: 651–661

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sanda M, Collins SH, Mahady J, Hutz J, Krantz K (1983) Three-month multicenter study of etodolac (Ultradol®) in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Curr Ther Res 33: 782–792

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson SL, Bergman SA (1985) Relief of dental surgery pain: a controlled 12-hour comparison of etodolac, aspirin, and placebo. Anesth Prog Jul/Aug: 151–156

  11. Versichelen L, Bilsback P, Rolly G, Merlo, Joubert L (1983) Etodolac in post-surgical pain: double-blind dose-ranging efficacy study with aspirin and placebo. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 20: 236–239

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCarty DJ (1985) Arthritis and allied conditions. A textbook of rheumatology. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, Pa, pp 1282–1283

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neuman RG, Wilson BD, Barkley M, Kimball ES, Weichman BM, Wood DP (1987) Inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis by etodolac. I. Selective activities in arthritis. Agents Actions 21: 160–166

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lynch S, Brogden RN (1986) Etodolac. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic activity and therapeutic use. Drugs 31: 288–300

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speigh TM, Avery GS (1979) Naproxen up to date: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy and use in rheumatic diseases and pain states. Drugs 18: 241–277

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wallace SL, Singer JZ (1988) Therapy in gout. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 14: 441–457

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zvaifler N (1989) A review of the antiarthritic efficacy and safety of etodolac. Clin Rheumatol 8: 43–53

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jacob G, Messina M, Caperton E, Gordon R, Harris G, Sack B, Vreede P, Weitzman R (1985) Safety and efficacy of etodolac, once or twice a day, in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Ther Res 37: 1124–1129

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pena, M. Etodolac: Analgesic effects in musculoskeletal and postoperative pain. Rheumatol Int 10 (Suppl 1), 9–16 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274750

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274750

Key words

Navigation