Skip to main content
Log in

Intra- and interindividual variation in flank gland secretions of free-ranging shrewsCrocidura russula

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individual differences in flank gland secretions were examined among males of the monogamous shrewCrocidura russula during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. Gas chromatography was used to measure intra- and interindividual variation of flank gland secretions of free-ranging shrews from different populations. The number of compounds detected by gas Chromatographic analyses was correlated with body mass, flank gland size, and the presence of blood parasites in individual shrews. Very few compounds were detected from the flank gland area of juvenile males. After they reached sexual maturity, however, the number of compounds detected from the flank gland secretions increased significantly. At the beginning of the reproductive season 48 different compounds were detected from male flank gland secretions. In the middle of the breeding season 70 compounds were detected, while only 11 compounds were detected during the nonbreeding season. Few compounds were common to all males. There were more volatile compounds in the flank gland secretions of males in the beginning of the breeding season than later in the breeding season. Males from the same population had fewer differences in the elution profile of compounds than males from different populations indicating that individuals from a distinct population have similar elution profiles of compounds and that each population has its own type of elution profile. No correlations were found between the number of compounds detected by gas chromatography for each male and the male's body mass or flank gland size. Blood parasites (trypanosomes,Trypanosoma crocidurae) were found in only three of 30 males investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albone, E. S. 1984. Mammalian Semiochemistry, The Investigation of Chemical Signals between Mammals. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ärnbäck-Christie-Linde, A. 1914. On the cartilago palatina and the organ of Jacobson in some mammals.Morphol. Jahrb. 48:343–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, M., andAlexander, K. M. 1976. Hormonal control of scent marking in the indian musk shrew,Suncus murinus viridescens (Blyth).Horm. Behav. 7:431–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, M., Sokolov, V. E., andBasurmanova, O. A. 1986. Further observations on the ultrastructure of the flank gland of the musk shrew,Suncus murinus viridescens (Blyth).Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Anim. Sci.) 95:667–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, G. K. 1976. Diet influences attractiveness of urine in guinea pigs.Nature 263:587–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzecri, J.-P. 1973. L'analyse des données. Vol. 2, l'analyse des correspondances. Dunod, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besançon, F. 1984. Contribution á l'étude de la biologie et de la stratégie de reproduction deCrocidura russula (Soricidae, Insectivore) en zone tempérée. PhD dissertation. Lausanne.

  • Brown, R. E. 1979. Mammalian social odors: A critical review, pp. 103–162,in J. S. Rosenblatt, R. A. Hinde, C. Beer, and M.-C. Busnel (eds.). Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 10. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. E. 1985a. The rodents I: Effects of odours on reproductive physiology (primer effects), pp. 245–344,in R. E. Brown and D. Macdonald (eds.). Social Odours in Mammals, Vol. I. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. E. 1985b. The rodents II: Suborder Myomorpha, pp. 345–417,in R. E. Brown and D. Macdonald (eds). Social Odours in Mammals, Vol. I. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. E., andMacdonald, D. 1985. Social Odours in Mammals. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. E., andSchellinck, H. M. 1992. Interactions among the MHC, diet and bacteria in the production of social odors in rodents, pp. 175–181,in R. L. Doty and D. Müller-Schwarze (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 6. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumpt, E. 1923. Description d'une nouvelle espèce de trypanosomeTrypanosoma crocidurae chez une musaraigne (Crocidura russulus).Ann. Parasitol. 1:262–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantoni, D. 1990. Etude en milieu naturel de l'organisation sociale de trois espèces de musaraignes,Crocidura russula, Sorex coronatus etNeomys fodiens (Mammalia, Insectivora, Soricidae). PhD dissertation. Lausanne.

  • Cantoni, D. 1993. Social and spatial organization of free-ranging shrews,Sorex coronalus andNeomys fodiens (Insectivora, Mammalia).Anim. Behav. 45:975–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantoni, D., andRivier, L. 1992. Analysis of the secretions from the flank glands of 3 shrew species and their possible functions in a social context, pp. 99–106,in R. L. Doty and D. Müller-Schwarze (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 6. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantoni, D., andVogel, P. 1989. Social organization and mating system of free-ranging greater white-toothed shrews,Crocidura russula. Anim. Behav. 38:205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, A. 1991. An Introduction to Evolutionary Ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publication, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croin Michielsen, N. 1966. Intraspecific and interspecific competion in shrewsSorex araneus L. andSorex minutus L.Arch. Neer. Zool. 17:73–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, G. L., andConaway, C. M. 1967. The origin and hormonal control of scent production inSuncus murinus.J. Mammal. 48:420–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eadie, W. R. 1938. The dermal glands of shrews.J. Mammal. 19:171–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edrissian, G. H., Farhang-Azad, A., andNeronov, V. M. 1976. Trypanosomes of small mammals in Iran.J. Wildl. Dis. 12:497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J. F., andKleiman, D. G. 1972. Olfactory communication in mammals.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3:1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge, S., Sandell, M., andBrinck, C. 1982. Scent-marking and its territorial significance in stoats,Mustela erminea.Anim. Behav. 30:811–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favre, L., andVogel, P. 1992. Multilocus probes reveal a low polymorphism in the greater whitetoothed shrew. Second International Conference on DNA Fingerprinting, Belo Horizonte, Brazil (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Genoud, M. 1981. Contribution à l'étude de la stratégie énergétique et de la distribution écologique deCrocidura russula (Soricidae, Insectivore) en zone tempérée. PhD dissertation. Lausanne.

  • Genoud, M. 1988. Energetic strategies of shrews: ecological constraints and evolutionary implications.Mammal. Rev. 18:173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genoud, M., andVogel, P. 1990. Energy requirements during reproduction and reproductive effort in shrews (Soricidae).J. Zool. London 220:41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffroy-Saint-Hillaire, M. 1815. Mémoire sur les glandes odoriférantes des musaraignes.Mem. Mus. Hist. Nat. 6:299–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. H., andBradbury, J. W. 1991. Sexual selection, pp. 203–233,in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (eds.). Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 3 ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, S. 1914. Über die Seitendrüsen der Soriciden.Anat. Anz. 46:139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. E., andJernigan. P. 1994. Golden hamsters recognize individuals, not just individual scents.Anim. Behav. 48:129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavaliers. M., andColwell. D. D. 1995. Discrimination by female mice between the odours of parasitized and non-parasitized males.Proc. R. Soc. London B 261:37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, L., andLegendre, P. 1979. Ecologie Numerique, Vol. II. Masson. Paris, et les Presses de l'Université du Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized approach.Cancer Res. 27:209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M., andBakker, T. C. M. 1990. Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males.Nature 344:330–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M., andParker, G. A. 1991. Competition for resources, pp. 137–168,in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (eds.). Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 3 ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murariu, D. 1971. Contributions à la connaissance du système glandulaire tégumentaire chezSorex araneus L. etTalpa europea L. (Mammalia, Insectivora).Trav. Mus. Hist. Nat. Grigore Antipa 11:424–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murariu, D. 1972. Observations concerning the form, size, structure and spreading of the sebaceous and sudoriferous glands in theErinaceus europaeus L.,Crocidura leucodon Herm, andNeomys fodiens Schreb. (Mammalia, Insectivora).Trav. Mus. Hist. Nat. Griegore Antipa 12:393–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murariu, D. 1973. Données macro-et microscopiques sur les organes glandulaires latéraux chezSorex araneus L.,Neomys fodiens Schreb. etCrocidura Leucodon Herm, de Roumanie.Trav. Mus. Hist. Nat. Griegore Antipa 13:445–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mykytowicz, R., andGoodrich, B. S. 1974. Skin glands as organs of communication in mammals.J. Invest. Dermatol. 62:124–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natynczuk, S. E., andMacdonald, D. W. 1994, Analysis of rat haunch odor using dynamic solvent effect and principal component analysis.J. Chem. Ecol. 21:941–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K., andTang Halpin, Z. 1988. Individual odours and mate recognition in the prairie vole,Microtus ochrogaster. Anim. Behav. 36:1779–1787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niethammer, G. 1962. Die (bisher unbekannte) Schwanzdrüse der Hausspitzmaus,Crocidura russula (Hermann, 1780).Z. Saeugetierkd. 27:228–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O. P. 1946. Scent glands of the short-tailed shrew.Anat. Rec. 94:615–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, W. J. 1976. The social organization and territoriality of short-tailed shrew (Blarina brevicauda) populations in old-field habitats.Anim. Behav. 24:305–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poduschka, W. 1977. Insectivore communication, pp. 600–633,in T. A. Sebeok (ed.). How Animals Communicate. Indiana University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poduschka, W., andWemmer, C. 1986. Observations on chemical communication and its glandular sources in selected insectivora, pp. 609–616,in D. Duvall, D. Müller-Schwarze, and R. M. Silverstein (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 4. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, J. C., andVogel, P. 1984. Nouvelle méthode d'étude en nature des relations spatiales et sociales chezCrocidura russula (Mammalia, Soricidae).Mammalia 48:281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissman, E. F. 1987. Social variables influence female sexual behavior in the musk shrew (Suncus murinus).J. Comp. Psychol. 101:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissman, E. F. 1989. Male related chemical cues promote sexual receptivity in female musk shrew.Behav. Neural Biol. 51:114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivier, L., andBaumann, P. 1976. La spectrométrie de masse en biologie et médecine.Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 73:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, M. 1996. Seasonal variations in the sternal scent secretion in the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula),in R. Apfelbach (ed.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates VII. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellinck, H. M., West, A. M., andBrown, R. E. 1992. Rats can discriminate between the urine odors of genetically identical mice maintained on different diets.Physiol. Behav. 51:1079–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebek, K. 1978. Blood parasites of small mammals in western Hungary.Parasitol. Hung. 11:17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund, L., andSedlacek, F. 1985. Morphometry of the olfactory organ and olfactory thresholds of some fatty acids inSorex araneus.Acta Zool. Fenn. 173:249–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeen, J. T., andThiessen, D. D. 1977. Scent of gerbil cuisine.Physiol. Behav. 19:11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, D. M. 1976. Mammalian Odours and Pheromones. The Camelot Press, Southampton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang-Martinez, Z., Mueller, L. L., andTaylor, G. T. 1993. Individual odours and mating success in the golden hamsterMesocricetus auratus.Anim. Behav. 45:1141–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, L. E., Rissman, E. F., andBronson, F. H. 1987. Scent marking in the musk shrew (Suncus murinus).Physiol. Behav. 39:677–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaucher, C. 1971. Les Cestodes parasites des Soricidae d'Europe: Etude anatomique, révisions taxonomique et biologie.Rev. Suisse Zool. 78:1–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, P. 1972. Beitrag zur Fortpflanzungsbiologie der GattungenSorex, Neomys undCrocidura (Soricidae).Verh. Naturforsch. Ges. Basel 82:165–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, P. 1980. Metabolic level and biological strategies in shrews, pp. 170–180,in K. Schmidt-Nielsen, L. Bolis, and C. R. Taylor (eds.). Comparative Physiology: Primitive Mammals, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Holst, D. 1985. The primitive eutherians I: Orders Insectivore, Macroscelida and Scandentia, pp. 105–154,in R. E. Brown and D. W. Macdonald (eds.). Social Odours in Mammals, Vol. 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, G., andLiebisch, A. 1980. The ecology of some blood protozoa of wild small mammals in north Germany.Acta Trop. 37:31–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cantoni, D., Favre, L., Tencalla, F. et al. Intra- and interindividual variation in flank gland secretions of free-ranging shrewsCrocidura russula . J Chem Ecol 22, 1669–1688 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02272406

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02272406

Key Words

Navigation