Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of semelparity in Mount Kenya lobelias

  • Papers
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two closely related long-lived rosette plants in the genusLobelia occur on alpine Mount Kenya.Lobelia telekii grows in drier sites and is semelparous (dies after first reproduction).Lobelia keniensis grows in wetter sites and is iteroparous (flowers repeatedly). I used long-term data to evaluate two related models of the evolution of semelparity (‘reproductive effort’ and ‘demographic’), and found evidence to support only one. Eight years of population data indicate that a simple mathematical model accurately describes the demographic conditions that have favoured the evolution of semelparity. In drier sites,Lobelia individuals flower so infrequently and suffer such high mortality between reproductive episodes that the probability of future reproduction is outweighed by the greater fecundity associated with semelparity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, W. G. (1979) Patterns of resource allocation in wildflower populations of fields and woods.Amer. J. Bot. 66, 71–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, C. L. (1982a) Regulation of flower, fruit and seed production by a monocarpic perennial,Yucca whipplei.J. Ecol. 70, 357–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, C. L. (1982b) Spatial and temporal dispersal patterns of pollinators and their relationship to the flower strategy ofYucca whipplei (Agavaceae).Oecologia 54, 243–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. (1976) On reproducing more than once.Amer. Natur. 110, 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. (1980) The costs of reproduction and their consequences.Amer. Natur. 116, 45–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. and Schaffer, W. M. (1973) Life history consequences of natural selection: Cole's result revisited.Amer. Natur. 107, 791–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fone, A. L. (1989) A comparative study of annual and perennialHypochoeris (Asteraceae).J. Ecol. 77, 495–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, M. S., Vogt, K. J., Hamrick, J. L. and Calwell J. (1974) Reproductive strategies and growth patterns in sunflowers (Helianthus).Amer. Natur. 108, 889–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibengut, C. (1986)Hydrogeological map of Mount Kenya. African Studies Series, Vol. A3. Geographica Bernesia, Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. L., Fowler, N. L. and Levin, D. A. (1985) Plasticity in yield components in natural populations of three species ofSesbania.Ecology 66, 753–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, H. J. and Bazzaz, F. A. (1989) Individual and population responses of sexual and apomictic plants to environmental gradients.Amer. Natur. 134, 190–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzack, S. H. and Tuljapurkar, S. (1989) Population dynamics in variable environments VII. The demography and evolution of semelparity.Amer. Natur. 133, 901–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K. N. and Whitham, T. G. (1987) Flexible life history traits: shifts by scarlet gilia in response to pollinator abundance.Ecology 68, 1691–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelka, L. F. (1977) Energy allocation in annual and perennial lupines (Lupinus: Leguminosae).Ecology 58, 1055–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, R. (1979) Reproductive effort in annual and perennial species ofPlantago (Plantaginaceae).Amer. Natur. 114, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G. H. (1981) The evolution of inflorescence size and height in the waratah (Telopea speciosissima): the difficulty of interpreting correlations between plant traits and fruit set. InPollination and Evolution. (J. A. Armstrong, J. M. Powell and A. J. Richards, eds) pp. 91–4. Royal Botanical Gardens, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, E. J. (1942)The Reproductive Capacity of Plants 244 pp. G. Bell and Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sano, Y., Morishima, H. and Oka, H. (1980) Intermediate perennial-annual populations ofOryza perennis found in Thailand and their evolutionary significance.Bot. Mag. Tokyo 93, 291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sano, Y. and Morishima, H. (1982) Variation in resource allocation and adaptive strategy of a wild rice,Oryza perennis Meunch.Bot. Gaz. 143, 518–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, W. M. (1974) Selection for optimal life histories: the effects of age structure.Ecology 55, 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, W. M. and Gadgil, M. V. (1975) Selection for optimal life histories in plants. InEcology and Evolution of Communities (M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond, eds) Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, W. M. and Schaffer, V. M. (1977) The adaptive significance of variations in reproductive habit in Agavaceae. InEvolutionary Ecology (B. Stonehouse, ed.). Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, W. M. and Schaffer, V. M. (1979) The adaptive significance of variation in reproductive habit in the Agavaceae. II. Pollinator foraging behavior and selection for increased reproductive expenditure.Ecology 60, 1051–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, W. M. and Rosenzweig, M. L. (1977) Selection for optimal life histories. II. Multiple equilibria and the evolution of alternate reproductive strategies.Ecology 58, 60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. P. (1983) Population dynamics of VenezuelanEspeletia. Smithson.Contrib. Bot. 48, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spira, T. P. and Pollak, O. D. (1986) Comparative reproductive biology of alpine biennial and perennial gentians (Gentiana: Gentianaceae) in California.Amer. J. Bot. 73, 39–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struik, G. O. (1965) Growth patterns in some native annual and perennial herbs in southern Wisconsin.Ecology 46, 401–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, S. D. (1982) The pollination biology of paniculate agaves: documenting the importance of male fitness in plants. PhD diss., University of Arizona, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udovic, D. (1981) Determinants of fruit set inYucca whipplei: reproductive expenditure vs pollinator availability.Oecologia 48, 389–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udovic, D. and Acker, C. L. (1981) Fruit abortion and the regulation of fruit number inYucca whipplei.Oecologia 49, 245–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Andel, J. and Vera, F. (1977) Reproductive allocation inSenecio sylvaticus andChamaenerion angustifolium in relation to mineral nutrition.J. Ecol. 65, 747–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. P. (1981) A general model of comparative fecundity for semelparous and iteroparous species.Amer. Natur. 118, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. P. (1982) Bird visitation, seed set, and germination rates in twoLobelia species on Mount Kenya.Ecology 68, 1983–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. P. (1984) Comparative demography of semelparousLobelia telekii and iteroparousLobelia keniensis on Mount Kenya.J. Ecol. 72, 637–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. P. (1985)Lobelia telekii herbivory, mortality, and size at reproduction: variation with growth rate.Ecology 66, 1879–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. P. (1990) The population biology of Mount Kenya Lobelias. InTropical Alpine Environments — Plant Form and Function. (P. Rundel, ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, T.P. Evolution of semelparity in Mount Kenya lobelias. Evol Ecol 4, 157–171 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270913

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270913

Keywords

Navigation