Summary
The polychaeteOphryotrocha puerilis is a male-to-female sex-changer, whereasO. labronica has separate sexes throughout life. In other respects the two species are remarkably similar: they occur in the same habitat, they look the same, they eat the same things, and in someO. labronica populations sex-changers can actually be found. The size-advantage hypothesis predicts that inO. puerilis males should not benefit reproductively from a size increase as much as males inO. labronica: henceO. puerilis but notO. labronica males should change to the female sex at a certain size. I experimentally compared reproductive success at different body sizes between the two species. In isolated male-female pairs reproductive rate increased significantly with female body size but not with male body size, and this pattern was the same in both species. Hence male fecundityper se cannot account for the difference in reproductive type between the two species. In other experiments I investigated if larger males gained access to more females because they were superior competitors for mates or were preferred by females, compared to small males. InO. puerilis the combined effect of these two factors conferred no size advantage to the males, whereas inO. labronica larger males acquired more females than did smaller males. Hence interactions among males and females, in accordance with the size-advantage hypothesis, can explain why sex change is maintained inO. puerilis, and why separate sexes are maintained inO. labronica.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åkesson, B. (1970) Sexual conditions in a population of the polychaeteOphryotrocha labronica La Greca and Bacci from Naples.Ophelia 7, 167–76.
Åkesson, B. (1975) Reproduction in the genusOphryotrocha (Polychaeta, Dorvilleidae).Pubbl. Staz. Zool. Napoli 39, 377–98.
Bacci, G., Lanfranco, M., Mantello, I. and Tomba, M. (1979) A new pattern of hermaphroditism (inducible hermaphroditism) in populations ofOphryotrocha labronica (Annelida Polychaeta).Experientia 35, 605–6.
Berglund, A. (1986) Sex change by a polychaete: effects of social and reproductive costs.Ecology 67, 837–45.
Berglund, A. (1990) Sequential hermaphroditism and the size-advantage hypothesis: an experimental test.Anim. Behav. 39, 426–33.
Bierzychudek, P. (1984) Assessing ‘optimal’ life histories in a fluctuating environment: the evolution of sex-changing by jack-in-the-pulpit.Am. Nat. 123, 829–40.
Charnov, E. L. (1979) Natural selection and sex change in a pandalid shrimp: test of a life history theory.Am. Nat. 113, 715–34.
Charnov, E. L. (1981) Sex reversal inPandalus borealis: effect of a shrimp fishery?Mar. Biol. Letters 1, 269–72.
Charnov, E. L. (1982)The theory of sex allocation. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
Charnov, E. L. (1986) Size advantage may not always favor sex change.J. Theor. Biol. 119, 283–5.
Charnov, E. L., Maynard Smith, J. and Bull, J. J. (1976) Why be a hermaphrodite?Nature 263, 125–6.
Ghiselin, M. T. (1969) The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals.Quart. Rev. Biol. 44, 189–208.
Hoagland, K. E. (1978) Protandry and the evolution of environmentally-mediated sex change: a study of the mollusca.Malacologia 17, 365–91.
Hoffman, S. G., Schilhauer, M. P. and Warner, R. R. (1985) The cost of changing sex and the ontogeny of males under contest competition for mates.Evolution 39, 915–27.
La Greca, M. and Bacci, G. (1962) Una nuova specie diOphryotrocha delle coste tirreniche (Annelida, Polychaeta).Boll. Zool. 29, 7–18.
Leigh, E. G., Charnov, E. L. and Warner, R. R. (1976) Sex ratio, sex change, and natural selection.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 3655–60.
Leigh, E. G., Herre, E. A. and Fisher, E. A. (1985) Sex allocation in animals.Experientia 41, 1265–76.
Nakashima, Y. (1987) Reproductive strategies in a partially protandrous shrimp,Athanas kominatoensis (Decapoda, Alpheidae) — sex change as the best of a bad situation for subordinates.J. Ethol. 5, 145–59.
Parenti, U. (1960) Self-fertilization inOphryotrocha labronica.Experientia 16, 413–4.
Pfannenstiel, H. D. (1976) Ist der PolychaetOphryotrocha labronica ein Protandrischer Hermaphrodit?Mar. Biol. 38, 169–78.
Pfannenstiel, H. D. (1984) Sex determination and intersexuality in polychaetes.Fortschritte der Zoologie (West Germ.) 29, 81–98.
Policansky, D. (1981) Sex choice and the size advantage model in jack-in-the-pulpitArisaema triphylum.Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 1306–8.
Policansky, D. (1982) Sex change in plants and animals.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13, 471–95.
Rolando, A. (1981) Early courtship and sexual differentiation inOphryotrocha labronica La Greca & Bacci (Polychaeta Dorvilleidae).Monitore Zool. Ital. (N.S.) 15, 53–61.
Rolando, A. (1984) The sex induction hypothesis and reproductive behaviour in four gonochoristic species of the genusOphryotrocha (Annelida Polychaeta).Monitore Zool. Ital. (N.S.) 18, 287–99.
Rolando, A. and Giorda, R. (1982) Male intersexes inOphryotrocha labronica La Greca & Bacci (Annelida Polychaeta).Monitore Zool. Ital. (N.S.) 16, 67–73.
Sella, G. and Zambaldi, M. (1985) Self-fertilization effects on some fitness traits inOphryotrocha labronica (Polychaeta, Dorvilleidae).Nova Thallassia 7, 435.
Warner, R. R., Robertson, D. R. and Leigh, E. G. (1975) Sex change and sexual selection.Science 190, 633–8.
Warner, R. R. (1984) Deferred reproduction as a response to sexual selection in a coral reef fish: a test of the life historical consequences.Evolution 38, 148–62.
Warner, R. R. and Lejeune, P. (1985) Sex change limited by paternal care: a test using four Mediterranean labrid fishes, genusSymphodus.Mar. Biol. 87, 89–99.
Wright, W. G. (1989) Intraspecific density mediates sex-change in the territorial patellacean limpetLottia gigantea.Mar. Biol. 100, 353–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berglund, A. To change or not to change sex: A comparison between twoOphryotrocha species (Polychaeta). Evol Ecol 5, 128–135 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270829
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270829