Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution in heterogeneous environments: Effects of migration on habitat specialization

  • Papers
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Richard Levins introduced fitness sets as a tool for investigating evolution within heterogeneous environments. Evolutionary game theory permits a synthesis and generalization of this approach by considering the evolutionary response of organisms to any scale of habitat heterogeneity. As scales of heterogeneity increase from fine to coarse, the evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) switches from a single generalist species to several species that become increasingly specialized on distinct habitats. Depending upon the organisms' ecology, the switch from one to two species may occur at high migration rates (relatively fine-grained environment), or may only occur at very low migration rates (coarse-grained environment). At the ESS, the evolutionary context of a species is the entire landscape, while its ecological context may be a single habitat.

Evolution towards the ESS can be represented with adaptive landscapes. In the absence of frequency-dependence, shifting from a single strategy ESS to a two strategy ESS poses the problem of evolving across valleys in the adaptive surface to occupy new peaks (hence, Sewell Wright's shifting balance theory). Frequency-dependent processes facilitate evolution across valleys. If a system with a two strategy ESS is constrained to possess a single strategy, the population may actually evolve a strategy that minimizes fitness. Because the population now rests at the bottom of a valley, evolution by natural selection can drive populations to occupy both peaks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, P. A. (1986) Character displacement and niche shift analyzed using consumer-resource models of competition.Theor. Pop. Biol. 29, 107–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, P. A. (1987) Alternate models of character displacement. I. Displacement when there is competition for nutritionally essential resources.Evolution 41, 651–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, P. A. (1990) Mixed responses to resource densities and their implications for character displacement.Evol. Ecol. 4, 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, J. S. (1982) Niche shift and the minimization of competition.Theor. Pop. Biol. 22, 367–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. (1990) Habitat selection as an evolutionary game.Evolution 44, 732–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. and Vincent, T. L. (1987) Coevolution as an evolutionary game.Evolution 41, 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comins, H. N., Hamilton, W. D. and May, R. (1980). Evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies.J. Theor. Biol. 82, 205–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feder, J. L., Chilcote, C. A. and Bush, G. L. (1988) Genetic differentiation and sympatric host races of the apple maggot fly,Rhagoletis pomonella.Nature (London)336, 61–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S. D. and Lucas Jr., H. L. (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development.Acta Biotheor. 19, 16–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. and May, R. (1977) Dispersal in stable environments.Nature (London)269, 578–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. D. (1985) Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution.Theor. Pop. Biol. 28, 181–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. D. and Gaines, M. S. (1992) Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches.Evol. Ecol. 6, 433–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, B. P. and Brown, J. S. (1988) Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 281–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, L. R. and Maynard Smith, J. (1976) The coevolution and stability of competing species.Am. Nat. 110, 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S., Cohen, D. and Hastings, A. (1984) Dispersal strategies in patchy environments.Theor. Pop. Biol. 26, 165–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1962) Theory of fitnesses in a heterogeneous environment, I. The fitness set and adaptive function.Am. Nat. 96, 361–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1968)Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, H. and Namba, T. (1989) Co-evolutionarily stable community structure in a patchy environment.J. Theor. Biol. 136, 229–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. and Price, G. R. (1973) The logic of animal conflict.Nature (London)246, 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. W. (1992) Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes.Evol. Ecol. 6, 412–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, C. M., Lande, R. and Bull, J. J. (1989) A model of population growth, dispersal, and evolution in a changing environment.Ecology 70, 1657–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H. R. (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation.Am. Nat. 132, 652–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. R. and Salt, G. W. (1990) The evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character under sympatric conditions: experimental evidence.Evolution 44, 1140–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. (1978) Competitive speciation.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10, 275–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. (1981) A theory of habitat selection.Ecology 62, 327–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. (1987) Habitat selection as a source of biological diversity.Evol. Ecol. 1, 315–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. (1976) Resource partitioning among competing species — a coevolutionary approach.Theor. Pop. Biol. 9, 388–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M. (1980) Ecological character displacement.Ecology 61, 163–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M. (1985) Gene flow in natural populations.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 393–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taper, M. L. and Case, T. J. (1985) Quantitative genetic models for the coevolution of character displacement.Ecology 66, 355–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taper, M. L. and Case, T. J. (1992) Models of character displacement and the theoretical robustness of taxon cycles.Evolution 46, 317–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. (1982)Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venable, D. L. and Brown, J. S. (1988) The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy, and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments.Am. Nat. 131, 360–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, T. L. and Brown, J. S. (1984) Stability in an evolutionary game.Theor. Pop. Biol. 26, 408–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, T. L. and Brown, J. S. (1988) The evolution of ESS theory.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 423–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W. (1977)Evolution and Genetics of Populations. Vol. 3, Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, J.S., Pavlovic, N.B. Evolution in heterogeneous environments: Effects of migration on habitat specialization. Evol Ecol 6, 360–382 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270698

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270698

Keywords

Navigation