Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosome-specific paints from a high-resolution flow karyotype of the dog

  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures and duallaser flow cytometry, we have routinely obtained high-resolution bivariate flow karyotypes of the dog in which 32 peaks are resolved. To allow the identification of the chromosome types in each peak, chromosomes were flow sorted, amplified and labelled by polymerase chain reaction with partially degenerate primers and hybridized onto metaphase spreads of a male dog. The chromosome paints from 22 of the 32 peaks each hybridized to single homologue pairs and eight peaks each hybridized to two pairs. Paints from the remaining two peaks hybridized to only one homologue each in the male metaphase spread, thus corresponding to the sex chromosomes X and Y. All of the 38 pairs of autosomes and the two sex chromosomes of the dog could be accounted for in these painting experiments. The positions of chromosomes 1–21 were assigned to the flow karyotype (only chromosomes 1–21 have as yet been officially designated). The high-resolution flow karyotype and the chromosome paints will facilitate further standardization of the dog karyotype. The ability to sort sufficient quantities of dog chromosomes for the production of chromosome-specific DNA libraries has the potential to accelerate the physical and genetic mapping of the dog genome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carter NP (1994a) Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting.Cytometry 18: 2–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter NP (1994b) Bivariate chromosome analysis using a commerical flow cytometer.Methods Mol Biol 29: 187–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter NP (1994c) Chromosome painting using degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction-amplified flow-sorted human chromosomes. In: Celis JE ed.Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook, Vol. 2. San Diego: Academic Press, pp 442–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter NP, Ferguson-Smith MA, Perryman MTet al. (1992) Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics.J Med Genet 29: 299–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer T, Lichter P, Borden J, Ward DC, Manuelidis L (1988) Detection of chromosome aberrations in metaphase and interphase tumor cells by in situ hybridization using chromosome-specific library probes.Hum Genet 80: 235–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer PE, Holmes NG, Dickens HF, Thomas R, Binns MM, Nacheva E (1995) The application of FISH techniques for physical mapping in the dog (Canis familiaris). Mammalian Genome 7.

  • Jauch A, Wienberg J, Stanyon Ret al. (1992) Reconstruction of genomic rearrangements in great apes and gibbons by chromosome painting.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 8611–8615.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes NG, Dickens HF, Parker HL, Binns MM, Mellersch CS, Sampson J (1995) Eighteen canine microsatellites.Ann Genet 26: 132–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford CF, Telenius H, Carter NP, Miller NG, Tucker EM (1992) Chromosome painting using chromosome-specific probes from flow-sorted pig chromosomes.Cytogenet Cell Genet 61: 221–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langford CF, Telenius H, Miller NG, Thomsen PD, Tucker EM (1993) Preparation of chromosome-specific paints and complete assignment of chromosomes in the pig flow karyotype.Anim Genet 24: 261–267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter P, Cremer T, Borden J, Manuelidis L, Ward DC (1988) Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries.Hum Genet 80: 224–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien SJ, Womack JE, Lyons LA, Moore KJ, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG (1993) Anchored reference loci for comparative genome mapping in mammals.Nature Genet 3: 103–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrander EA, Mapa FA. Yee M, Rine J (1995) One hundred and one new simple sequence repeat-based markers for the canine genome.Mammalian Genome 6: 192–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkel D, Landegent J, Collins Cet al. (1988) Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 9138–9142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbitts P, Impey H, Heppell-Partonet al. (1995) Chromosome specific paints from a high resolution flow karyotype of the mouse.Nature Genet 9: 369–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rettenberger G, Klett C, Zechner U, Kunz J, Vogel W, Hameister H (1995) Visualization of the conservation of synteny between humans and pigs by heterologous chromosomal painting.Genomics 26: 372–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherthan H, Cremer T, Arnason Uet al. (1994) Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals.Nature Genet 6: 342–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selden JR, Moorhead PS, Oehlert ML, Patterson DF (1975) The giemsa banding pattern of the canine karyotype.Cytogenet Cell Genet 15: 380–387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sillar R, Young BD (1981) A new method for the preparation of metaphase chromosomes for flow analysis.J Histochem Cytochem 29: 74–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Telenius H, Carter NP, Bebb CEet al. (1992a) Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer.Genomics 13: 718–725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Tunnacliffe Aet al. (1992b) Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes.Genes Chrom Cancer 4: 257–263.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trask B, van-den-Engh G, Gray JW (1989a) Inheritance of chromosome heteromorphisms analyzed by high-resolution bivariate flow karyotyping.Am J Hum Genet 45: 753–760.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trask B, van-den-Engh G, Mayall B, Gray JW (1989b) Chromosome heteromorphism quantified by high-resolution bivariate flow karyotyping.Am J Hum Genet 45: 739–752.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VanDevanter DR, Choongkittaworn NM, Dyer KAet al. (1994) Pure chromosome-specific PCR libraries from single sorted chromosomes.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 5858–5862.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verma RS, Babu A (1995)Human Chromosomes: Principles and Techniques, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne RK (1993) Molecular evolution of the dog family.Trends Genet 9: 218–824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wienberg J, Stanyon R, Jauch A, Cremer T (1992) Homologies in human andMacaca fuscata chromosomes revealed byin situ suppression hybridization with human chromosome specific DNA libraries.Chromosoma 101: 265–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Carter NP, Shi L, Ferguson-Smith MA (1995) A comparative study of karyotypes of muntjacs by chromosome painting.Chromosoma 103: 642–652.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yerle M, Schmitz A, Milan Det al. (1993) Accurate characterization of porcine bivariate flow karyotype by PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization.Genomics 16: 97–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigel P. Carter.

Additional information

accepted for publication by H. C. Macgregor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langford, C.F., Fischer, P.E., Binns, M.M. et al. Chromosome-specific paints from a high-resolution flow karyotype of the dog. Chromosome Res 4, 115–123 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259704

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259704

Key words

Navigation