Skip to main content
Log in

Does preoperative stoma marking and education by the enterostomal therapist affect outcome?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is generally accepted that preoperative patient education and skin marking for a stoma location are important in avoiding stoma complications. At our institution, enterostomal therapists are available to educate and mark patients before their surgery. However, for various reasons, not all patients who had an elective stoma created, had preoperative skin marking or instructions on stoma care. Our registry of patients provided us with a means of comparing patients who have undergone an elective stoma with (Group I) and without (Group II) preoperative marking and education. METHODS: Our stoma registry consisting of 1,790 patients was retrospectively reviewed from 1978 to 1996 to assess all patients who underwent elective stoma construction. Patients included for review had a total of 593 elective stomas. All patients with stomas are followed by the enterostomal therapists postoperatively and, therefore, were evaluated for both early and late complications. Early complications were defined as any adverse event occurring within 30 days of surgery and late complications as those occurring 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Our enterostomal therapists preoperatively evaluated 292 of the 593 patients planned for possible stoma creation. This included careful marking of the stoma site by having the patients lie down, sit, and stand and locating a stable flat area on the abdomen, taking into account the belt line and any abnormal skin creases or deformities. Patients were instructed on stoma appearance with a model and given basic stoma care instructions. In Group I, there were 95 (32.5 percent) complications (68 (23.3 percent) occurred early and 27 (9.25 percent) occurred late). There were 301 patients who did not receive preoperative evaluation (Group II). In this second group, 131 (43.5 percent) complications were found, (95 (31.6 percent) occurred early and 36 (12 percent) occurred late). The difference in total number of complications between groups was determined to be statistically significant, with a P value of <0.0075, as was the difference in early complications, with a P value of <0.03. The difference in late complications is not significant, with a P value of <0.34. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that preoperative evaluation by an enterostomal therapist, marking of the skin site, and providing patient education reduce adverse outcomes. All elective procedures that may result in stoma formation should, therefore, be assessed and marked preoperatively. Patients, likewise, should be informed and taught to care for their forthcoming stomas preoperatively and postoperatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheung MT. Complications of an abdominal stoma: an analysis of 322 stomas. Aust N Z J Surg 1995;65:808–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK. Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:916–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Unti JA, Abcarian H, Pearl RK,et al. Rodless end-loop stomas: seven-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:999–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

All data reported in this article was obtained through the stoma registry at Cook County Hospital.

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.

About this article

Cite this article

Bass, E.M., Del Pino, A., Tan, A. et al. Does preoperative stoma marking and education by the enterostomal therapist affect outcome?. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 440–442 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258389

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258389

Key words

Navigation