Abstract
PURPOSE: Although sutureless anastomosis by use of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring is now accepted as an alternative to conventional manual sutured or stapled methods in elective enterocolic surgery, its applicability to emergency enterocolic surgery has not yet been established. The aim of this prospective study was to determine whether the biofragmentable anastomotic ring anastomosis in emergency enterocolic surgery could be performed as safely as in elective surgery or as emergency handsewn anastomosis. METHODS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sutureless bowel anastomosis by use of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring in emergency enterocolic surgery, a prospective, randomized study was undertaken to compare the biofragmentable anastomotic ring with conventional handsewn anastomotic technique. One hundred nineteen patients who required emergency laparotomy were randomly assigned to two groups: 56 patients (47 percent) underwent 58 biofragmentable anastomotic ring anastomoses, and 63 patients (53 percent) underwent 65 sutured anastomoses. In addition, the safety and efficacy of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring in emergency surgery were compared with those of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring in 86 elective biofragmentable anastomotic ring anastomoses performed in 84 patients during the same period of time. RESULTS: Specific intraoperative complications related to use of biofragmentable anastomotic rings occurred in six patients (10.7 percent), and another new biofragmentable anastomotic ring anastomosis was constructed in one patient. These reflected learning-curve errors, but they did not adversely affect the outcome. No statistical differences were observed among the groups with respect to wound complications, postoperative bleeding, intra-abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction, or postoperative death. As for anastomotic leakage, six patients, two in each group, had complications of anastomotic failure, wherein four colonic fistulas required a diversion and two enteric fistulas closed spontaneously. Although there were no statistically significant differences in incidence of leaks among groups (P=0.4522), two fistulas in colocolic anastomoses, one in the suture group and the other in the biofragmentable anastomotic ring group, manifested the risk of primary anastomosis in emergency colon resection. Seven patients, three in the elective biofragmentable anastomotic ring group and two each in the emergency suture and biofragmentable anastomotic ring groups, died after the operation, but no deaths were directly attributed to the anastomotic technique used. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that the biofragmentable anastomotic ring is a safe and reliable alternative to conventional handsewn anastomosis in emergency enterocolic surgery, where the rapidity and security of anastomosis may be critical. Consideration, however, should be given to emergency primary colocolic or colorectal anastomosis, because of a high risk of anastomotic failure, although there are too few cases for a definite conclusion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hardy TG Jr, Pace WG, Maney JW, Katz AR, Kaganov AL. A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis: an experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:484–90.
Senn N. Enterorrhaphy; its history, technique and present status. JAMA 1893;21:215–35.
Maney JW, Katz AR, Li LK, Pace WG, Hardy TG. Biofragmentable bowel anastomosis ring: comparative efficacy studies in dogs. Surgery 1988;103:56–62.
Corman ML, Prager ED, Hardy TG Jr, Bubrick MP, and The Valtrac (BAR) Study Group. Comparison of the Valtrac biofragmentable anastomosis ring with conventional suture and stapled anastomosis in colon surgery: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:183–7.
Cahill CJ, Betzler M, Gruwez JA, Jeekel J, Patel JC, Zederfeldt B. Sutureless large bowel anastomosis: European experience with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. Br J Surg 1989;76:344–7.
Bubrick MP, Corman ML, Cahill CJ, Hardy TG Jr, Nance FC, Shatney CH, the BAR Investigational Group. Prospective, randomized trial of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. Am J Surg 1991;161:136–43.
Dyess DL, Curreri PW, Ferrara JJ. A new technique for sutureless intestinal anastomosis: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Am Surg 1990;56:71–5.
Gullichsen R, Havia T, Ovaska J, Rantala A. Colonic anastomosis using the biofragmentable anastomotic ring and manual suture: a prospective, randomized study. Br J Surg 1992;79:578–80.
Gullichsen R, Ovaska J, Rantala A, Havia T. Small bowel anastomosis with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring and manual suture: a prospective, randomized study. World J Surg 1992;16:1006–9.
Hardy TG Jr, Aguilar PS, Stewart WR,et al. Initial clinical experience with a biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:55–61.
Ernstoff JJ, Howard DA, Marshall JB, Jumshyd A, McCullough AJ. A randomized, blinded clinical trial of a rapid colonic lavage solution (Golytely) compared with standard preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema. Gastroenterology 1983;84:1512–6.
Dudley HA, Radcliffe AG, McGreehan D. Intraoperative irrigation of the colon to permit primary anastomosis. Br J Surg 1980;67:80–1.
Munro A, Steele RJ, Logie JR. Technique for intraoperative colonic irrigation. Br J Surg 1987;75:1039–40.
McCue JL, Phillips RK. Sutureless intestinal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1991;78:1291–6.
Luukkonen P, Järvinen HJ, Haapiainen R. Early experience with biofragmentable anastomosis ring in colon surgery. Acta Chir Scand 1990;156:795–9.
Forde KA, McLarty AJ, Tsai J, Ghalili K, Delany HM. Murphy's button revisited: clinical experience with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. Ann Surg 1993;217:78–81.
Chen TC, Ding KC, Yang MJ, Chang CP. New device for biofragmentable anastomotic ring in low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:834–6.
Chen TC, Yang MJ, Chang CP. New anastomotic gun for biofragmentable anastomotic ring in low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1214–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Read at the 15th World Congress of Collegium Internationale Chirurgiae Digestivae, Seoul, South Korea, September 11 to 14, 1996.
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, H.J., Kim, H.H., Jung, G.J. et al. Intestinal anastomosis by use of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring. Dis Colon Rectum 41, 1281–1286 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258229
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258229