Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hydrogen peroxide-enhanced transanal ultrasound in the assessment of fistula-in-ano

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Appropriate classification of the fistulous tracts in patients with fistula-in-ano may be of value for the planning of proper surgery. Conventional transanal ultrasound has limited value in the visualization of fistulous tracts and their internal openings. Hydrogen peroxide can be used as a contrast medium for ultrasound to improve visualization of fistulas. PURPOSE: This prospective study evaluates hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with physical examination, standard ultrasound, and surgery in the assessment of fistula-in-ano. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients (4 women; mean age, 42 years) with fistula-in-ano were evaluated by local physical examination (inspection, probing, and digital examination), conventional ultrasound, and hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound before surgery. Ultrasound was performed using a B&K Diagnostic Ultrasound System™ with a 7-MHz rotating endoprobe. Hydrogen peroxide (3%) was infusedvia a small catheter into the fistula. The results of physical examination, ultrasound, and hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound were compared with surgical data as the criterion standard. The additive value of standard ultrasound and hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound compared with physical examination was also determined. RESULTS: At surgery, 8 intersphincteric and 11 transsphincteric fistulas and 2 sinus tracts (without an internal opening) were found. During physical examination, probing was incomplete in 13 patients, the diagnosis being correct in the other 8 patients (38%) as a low (intersphincteric or transsphincteric) fistula. With conventional ultrasound, the assessment of fistula-in-ano was correct in 13 patients (62%); defects in one or both sphincters could also be found (n=8). With hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound, the fistulous tract was classified correctly in 20 patients, the overall concordance with surgery being 95%. The internal opening was found at physical examination in 15 patients (71%), with hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound in 10 patients (48%), and during surgery in 19 patients (90%). Secondary extensions, confirmed during surgery, were found in five cases. In two patients, a secondary extension with hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound was not confirmed during surgery. Both patients developed a recurrent fistula. CONCLUSION: Hydrogen peroxide-enhanced ultrasound is superior to physical examination and standard ultrasound in delineating the anatomic course of perianal fistulas. It makes accurate preoperative assessment of the fistula possible and may be of value for the surgeon in planning therapeutic strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sainio P, Husa A. Fistula-in-ano: clinical features and long-term results of surgery in 199 adults. Acta Chir Scand 1985;151:169–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shouler PJ, Grimley RP, Keighley M, Alexander WJ. Fistula-in-ano is usually simple to manage surgically. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:113–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elliot MS, Hancke E, Henry MM,et al. Faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987;2:173–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Anal fistula surgery: factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:723–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cuesta MA, Meijer S, Derksen EJ, Boutkan H, Meuwissen SG. Anal sphincter imaging in fecal incontinence using endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:59–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartram CI. Anal endosonography. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol 1992;28:185–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eckardt VF, Jung B, Fischer B, Lierse W. Anal endosonography in healthy subjects and patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:235–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deen KI, Williams JG, Hutchinson R, Keighley M, Kumar D. Fistulas in ano:endoanal ultrasonographic assessment assists decision making for surgery. Gut 1994;35:391–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cotte L, Pujol B, Valette PJ, Grandjean JP, Souquet JC. Complicated perianorectal fistula: contribution of endosonography. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1990;14:510–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Law PJ, Talbot RW, Bartram CI, Northover J. Anal endosonography in the evaluation of perianal sepsis and fistula in ano. Br J Surg 1989;76:752–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Comparison between anal endosonography and digital examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae. Br J Surg 1991;78:445–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheong DM, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD, Jagelman DG. Anal endosonography for recurrent anal fistulas: image enhancement with hydrogen peroxide. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:1158–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Iroatulam A, Nogueras J, Chen H,et al. Accuracy of endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating anal fistulas. Gastroenterology 1997;112(Suppl):A1450.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parks A, Gordon P, Hardcastle J. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 1976;63:1–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuijpers HC, Schulpen T. Fistulography for fistula-in-ano: is it useful? Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:103–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schratter SA, Lochs H, Vogelsang H, Schurawitzki H, Herold C, Schratter M. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus computed tomography in the differential diagnosis of perianorectal complications in Crohn's disease. Endoscopy 1993;25:582–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koelbel G, Schmiedl U, Majer MC,et al. Diagnosis of fistulae and sinus tracts in patients with Crohn disease: value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:999–1003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jenss H, Starlinger M, Skaleij M. Magnetic resonance imaging in perianal Crohn's disease [letter]. Lancet 1992;340:8830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Myhr GE, Myrvold HE, Nilsen G, Thoresen JE, Rinck PA. Perianal fistulas: use of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology 1994;191:545–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lunniss PJ, Barker PG, Sultan AH,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:708–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hussain S, Stoker J, Schouten W, Hop W, Lameris J. Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification. Radiology 1996;200:475–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Felt-Bersma RJ, van Baren R, Koorevaar M, Strijers RL, Cuesta MA. Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:249–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1905–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McLeod RS. Management of fistula-in-ano: 1990 Roussel Lecture. Can J Surg 1991;34:581–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. From the Departments of Surgery, University Hospital “Vrije Universiteit”, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    A. C. Poen M.D.,  R. J. F. Felt-Bersma M.D., Ph.D., Q. A. J. Eijsbouts M.D. & M. A. Cuesta M.D., Ph.D.

  2. Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital “Vrije Universiteit”, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    A. C. Poen M.D.,  R. J. F. Felt-Bersma M.D., Ph.D. & S. G. M. Meuwissen M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. A. C. Poen M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. J. F. Felt-Bersma M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Q. A. J. Eijsbouts M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. A. Cuesta M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. G. M. Meuwissen M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Dr. Poen was supported by a grant from Janssen-Cilag B.V., The Netherlands.

About this article

Cite this article

Poen, A.C., Felt-Bersma, R.J.F., Eijsbouts, Q.A.J. et al. Hydrogen peroxide-enhanced transanal ultrasound in the assessment of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 41, 1147–1152 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02239437

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02239437

Key words

Search

Navigation