Skip to main content
Log in

Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery

A prospective study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anorectal surgery can lead to fecal soiling and incontinence. Whether surgery changes the anatomy and causes symptoms is unknown. Anatomic changes can be visualized by anal endosonography. METHODS: We studied 50 patients after hemorrhoidectomy (24), fistulectomy (18), and internal sphincterotomy (8). Symptoms were assessed, and anal endosonography, anal manometry, mucosal electrosensitivity, and neurophysiologic tests were performed. RESULTS: In 23 (46 percent) patients, a defect of the anal sphincter was found (13 patients had an internal sphincter defect, 1 had an external sphincter defect, and 9 had a combined sphincter defect), 3 after hemorrhoidectomy, 13 after fistulectomy, and 7 after internal sphincterotomy. Seven patients had symptoms, and they all had a sphincter defect. In the other 16 of 23 patients (70 percent), the sphincter defect did not produce symptoms. An internal sphincter defect lowered maximum basal pressure and shortened sphincter length. CONCLUSION: Anal endosonography can reveal sphincter defects after anorectal surgery. Seventy percent of the patients in this group had no complaints; therefore, defects were unsuspected. This has clinical implications in the evaluation of patients with fecal incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burnett SJ, Spence-Jones C, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Unsuspected sphincter damage following childbirth revealed by anal endosonography. Br J Radiol 1991;64:225–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cuesta MA, Meijer S, Derksen EJ, Boutkan H, Meuwissen SG. Anal sphincter imaging in fecal incontinence using endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:59–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1991;78:312–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Speakman CT, Burnett SJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CISphincter injury after anal dilatation demonstrated by anal endosonography. Br J Surg 1991;78:1429–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA,et al. Anal endosonography and correlation within vitro andin vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 1993;80:508–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Rasmussen OØ, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Anal endosonographic findings in the follow-up of primarily sutured sphincteric ruptures. Br J Surg 1992;79:104–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnett SJ, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping. Br J Surg 1991;78:448–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. A comparison between electromyography and anal endosonography in mapping external anal sphincter defects. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:370–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M,et al. Anal endosonography: relationship with anal manometry and neurophysiologic tests. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:944–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McHugh SM, Diamant NE. Effect of age, gender, and parity on anal canal pressures: contribution of impaired anal sphincter function to fecal incontinence. Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:726–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bannister JJ, Abouzekry L, Read NW. Effect of aging on anorectal function. Gut 1987;28:353–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Felt-Bersma RJ, Gort G, Meuwissen SG. Normal values in anal manometry and rectal sensation: a problem of range. Hepatogastroenterology 1991;38:444–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laurberg S, Swash M. Effects of aging on the anorectal sphincters and their innervation. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:737–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelman DG. The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:22–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Laurberg S, Swash M, Henry MM. Delayed external sphincter repair for obstetric tear. Br J Surg 1988;75:786–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobs PP, Scheuer M, Kuijpers JH, Vingerhoets MH. Obstetric fecal incontinence: role of pelvic floor denervation and results of delayed sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:494–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Browning GG, Henry MM, Motson RW. Combined sphincter repair and postanal repair for the treatment of complicated injuries to the anal sphincters. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1988;70:324–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frenckner B, von Euler C. Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut 1975;16:638–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lestar B, Penninck F, Kerremans R. The composition of anal basal pressure. Anin vivo andin vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:118–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read in part at the meeting of The British Society for Gastroenterology, Warwick, United Kingdom, September 15 to 17, 1993.

About this article

Cite this article

Felt-Bersma, R.J.F., van Baren, R., Koorevaar, M. et al. Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 249–253 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055596

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055596

Key words

Navigation