Skip to main content
Log in

Is Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis really the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is widely claimed to have replaced total proctocolectomy with ileostomy as the “procedure of choice” for ulcerative colitis, largely on the basis of a perceived improved quality of life. There exists relatively little support for this assertion in the literature. Our aim was to determine if educated patients choosing total proctocolectomy with ileostomy have a similar quality of life as with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: All patients with ulcerative colitis referred to a single surgeon and deemed an appropriate surgical candidate were educated and then offered ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or total proctocolectomy with ileostomy. Age, gender, and complications (including pouchitis) were recorded prospectively, and all patients were questioned regarding functional outcome and level of satisfaction. They were then asked to complete a slightly modified Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, which was analyzed by categoric and overall scores. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients underwent elective surgery for ulcerative colitis during the study period. Fifty-five patients chose ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and 12 had total proctocolectomy with ileostomy. The groups were similar except for younger age and longer follow-up in the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis group. Patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis had significantly more short-term or long-term complications (49vs. 8 percent), with pouchitis being the most frequent complication. There was no difference in level of satisfaction between the two groups, and no patient in either group wishes they had undergone the other procedure. There was no difference in the overall or any categoric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with both procedures was similarly high. Patients who undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis can expect a high level of satisfaction, with a good quality of life. However, educated patients choosing an ileostomy can achieve the same quality of life, without the higher complication rate associated with a pelvic pouch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McIntyre PB, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Beart RW, Dozois RR. Comparing functional results one year and ten years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:303–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly KA. Anal sphincter-saving operations for chronic ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg 1992;193:5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pemberton JH, Phillips SF, Ready RR, Zinsmeister AR, Beahrs OH. Quality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: comparison of performance status. Ann Surg 1989;209:620–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Köhler LW, Pemberton JH, Zinsmeister AR, Kelly KA. Quality of life after proctocolectomy: a comparison of Brooke ileostomy, Kock pouch and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Gastroenterology 1991;101:679–84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McLeod RS, Churchill DN, Lock AM, Vanderburgh S, Cohen Z. Quality of life of patients with ulcerative colitis preoperatively and postoperatively. Gastroenterology 1991;101:1307–13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weinryb RM, Gustavsson JP, Liljeqvist L, Poppen B, Rossel RJ. A prospective study of the quality of life after pelvic pouch operations. J Am Coll Surg 1995;180:589–95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guyatt G, Mitchell A, Irvine EJ,et al. A new measure of health status for clinical trials in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1989;96:804–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Binderow SR, Wexner SD. Current surgical therapy for mucosal ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:610–24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hyman NH, Fazio VW, Tuckson WB, Lavery IC. Consequences of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Crohn's colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:653–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Phillips RK, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR. Proctocolectomy and ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: the longer term story. J R Soc Med 1989;82:386–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Jimmo, B., Hyman, N.H. Is Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis really the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis?. Dis Colon Rectum 41, 41–45 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236894

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236894

Key words

Navigation