Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps of the large bowel

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have introduced magnifying colonoscopy into clinical practice and analyzed its diagnostic efficacy, especially regarding the ability to distinguish neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps. METHODS: The materials consisted of 923 polyps. After identifying the lesions during normal colonoscopy, a dye was sprayed, and then the zoom apparatus of the colonoscope was used to make a magnified observation at a maximum 100 times magnification. We classified the crypt orifices into six categories and labeled them A to F as follows: A, a medium round appearance; B, an asteroid appearance; C, an elliptic appearance; D, a small, round appearance; E, a cerebriform appearance; F, no apparent structural appearance. RESULTS: Forty-two of 923 polyps did not reveal any clear images of crypt patterns. The percentage of histologically neoplastic change in the lesions classified as A, B, C, D, E, and F were 10, 15.9, 93.7, 100, 94.8, and 87.5 percent, respectively. When we considered types A and B to represent a crypt pattern of non-neoplastic lesions, and types C, D, E, and F to represent neoplastic lesions, and when the lesions that did not show any clear images were classified as a misjudgment, the diagnostic accuracy of neoplastic lesions (sensitivity) was 92 percent and that of non-neoplastic lesions (specificity) was 73.3 percent. Overall, the diagnostic accuracy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions was 88.4 percent. Twenty-three neoplastic lesions that were misjudged to be non-neoplastic were histologically adenoma with mild atypia in 22 and adenoma with moderate atypia in 1. CONCLUSION: Magnifying colonoscopy was considered to be useful in determining the indications for colonoscopic removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deyhle P, Largiader F, Jenny S. A method for endoscopic electroresection of sessile colonic polyps [letter]. Endoscopy 1973;5:38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kudo S. Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 1993;25:455–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wadas DD, Sanowski RA. Complications of the hot biopsy forceps technique. Gastrointest Endosc 1988;34:32–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Waye JD. Management of complications of colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterologist 1993;1:158–64.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jentschura D, Raute M, Winter J,et al. Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Therapy and prognosis. Surg Endosc 1994;8:672–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yokota T, Sugihara K, Yoshida S. Endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal neoplastic lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1108–11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lieberman DA, Smith FW. Frequency of isolated proximal colonic polyps among patients referred for colonoscopy. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:473–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Goulston KJ. Clinical accuracy in the diagnosis of small polyps using the flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscope. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:699–72.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Neale AV, Demers RY, Budev H, Scott RO. Physician accuracy in diagnosing colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:247–50.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jaramillo E, Watanabe M, Slezak P, Rubio C. Flat neoplastic lessions of the colon and rectum detected by high-resolution video endoscopy and chromoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:114–22.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Axelrad AM, Fleischer DE, Geller AJ,et al. High-resolution chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of diminutive colon polyps: implications for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1253–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T,et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T,et al. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol 1994;47:880–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morson BC. Some peculiarities in the histology of intestinal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 1962;5:337–44.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Williams GT, Arthur JF, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. Metaplastic polyps and polyposis of the colorectum. Histopathology 1980;4:155–70.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strekalovsky V. Results of endoscopic removal of villous tumors of the colon. Endoscopy 1983;15:49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rubesin SE, Saul SH, Laufer I, Levine MS. Carpet lesions of the colon. Radiographics 1985;5:537–52.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 1992;326:658–62.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sakaki N, Iida Y, Okazaki Y,et al. Magnifying endoscopic observation of the gastric mucosa, particularly in patients with atrophic gastritis. Endoscopy 1978;10:269–74.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tada M, Misaki F, Kawai K. A new approach to the observation of minute changes of the colonic mucosa by means of magnifying colonoscope, type CF-MB-M (Olympus). Gastrointest Endosc 1978;24:146–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nishizawa M, Okada T, Sato F,et al. A clinicopathological study of minute polypoid lesions of the colon based on magnifying fiber-colonoscopy and dissecting microscopy. Endoscopy 1980;12:124–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN,et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 1996;39:449–56.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Warner AS, Glick ME, Fogt F. Multiple large hyperplastic polyps of the colon coincident with adenocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:123–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Togashi, K., Konishi, F., Ishizuka, T. et al. Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps of the large bowel. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 1602–1608 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236215

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236215

Key words

Navigation