Abstract
The contrast between the nostalgic pictures on maple syrup packaging and sophisticated technologies actually used in the sugarbush and sugarhouse suggests disjunctures between image and practice in the contemporary North American maple syrup industry. This paper argues that although evidence of a “technological treadmill” exists within the maple syrup industry, as it does in other rural production sectors, such a trend is incomplete due to the increasing importance of consumption-based activities and concerns in the countryside. In response to the interests of tourists, second home owners and other increasingly influential non-producer groups, “traditional” maple enterprises persist, demonstrating a logic and appeal unaccounted for by treadmill theory. By addressing growing consumer concern about the appearance of the rural landscape, the health of the environment, and the quality of food, these “traditional” maple practices can provide distinct advantages for producers over technological modernization. The tension between technology use and tourism in the maple syrup industry offers insights about the role of small-scale specialty agriculture for sustainability in rural areas of advanced industrial countries undergoing social and economic change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arsenault, A., G. Bessette, Y. Bergeron, J. Brisson, D. Gagnon, and Y. Mauffette. 1989. “Facteurs écologiques liés au dépérissement des forêts feuillues du sud-est du Québec.” Pp. 144–149 inCahier des Conférences de l'Atelier sur le Dépérissement dans les Érablières. Québec: Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation.
Bell, Robert D. 1955.Costs and Returns in Producing and Marketing Maple Products. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Bulletin No. 1016.
Bond, Dewey A. 1948.An Economic Study of the Maple Syrup Industry in New York State. Unpublished MS thesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Cochrane, Willard W. 1979.The Development of American Agriculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Cloke, Paul and Mark Goodwin. 1991. “Conceptualizing countryside change: From post-fordism to rural structured coherence.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Miami, FL.
Cloke, Paul and Chris C. Park. 1985.Rural Resource Management. London: Croom Helm.
Cloke, Paul and Nigel Thrift. 1990. “Class and change in rural Britain.” Pp. 165–181 inRural Restructuring: Global Processes and Their Responses, edited by T. Marsden, P. Lowe, and S. Whatmore. London: Fulton.
DeLind, Laura B. 1993. “Market niches, ‘cul de sacs,’ and social context: Alternative systems of food production.”Culture and Agriculture 47: 7–12.
Gagnon, Gilles and Gabriel Roy. 1989. “État du dépérissement des forêts au Québec.” Pp. 14–17 inCahier des Conférences de l'Atelier sur le Dépérissement dans les Érablières. Québec: Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation.
Hinrichs, C. Clare. 1993.Landscapes of Production, Landscapes for Consumption: A Comparative Study of the Vermont and Quebec Maple Syrup Industries. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Hitchcock, John A. 1928.Economics of the Farm Manufacture of Maple Syrup and Sugar. Burlington, VT: Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin 285.
Huyler, Neil K. and Lawrence D. Garrett. 1979.A Cost Analysis: Processing Maple Syrup Products. Forest Service Research Paper NE-430. Broomall, PA: USDA, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
Innis, H. A. (ed.). 1937.The Dairy Industry in Canada. Toronto: Ryerson.
James, Randall E. and Barbara H. Drake. 1990. “International maple syrup distribution channels and barriers to expanding markets.” Paper presented at annual meetings of the Food Distribution Research Society, College Park, MD.
Lancaster, Kenneth F., Russell S. Walters and Arthur H. Rye. 1982.Collecting Maple Sap with Plastic Tubing. NA-FR-23. Broomall, PA: USDA, Forest Service, Northeastern Experiment Station.
Lyson, Thomas A. and Charles C. Geisler. 1992. “Toward a second agricultural divide: The restructuring of American agriculture.”Sociologia Ruralis 32: 248–263.
MacCannell, Dean. 1976.The Tourist. New York: Schocken.
Marsden, Terry. 1989. “Restructuring rurality: From order to disorder in agrarian political economy.”Sociologia Ruralis 29: 312–317.
Marsden, Terry, Jonathan Murdoch, Philip Lowe, Richard Munton, and Andrew Flynn. 1993.Constructing the Countryside. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Meeks, Harold A. 1986.Time and Change in Vermont: A Human Geography. Chester, CT: Globe Pequot.
Mitchell, Brent. 1987. “Air pollution and maple decline.”Nexus 9 (3): 1–13.
Mitchell, Don. 1986. “Capital-intensive syrup.” Pp. 89–93 inLiving Up Country. Dublin, NH: Yankee.
Mormont, Marc. 1990. “Who is rural? or, how to be rural: Towards a sociology of the rural.” Pp. 21–44 inRural Restructuring: Global Processes and Their Responses, edited by T. Marsden, P. Lowe, and S. Whatmore. London: Fulton.
Northeast Marketing Committee. 1972.Modern Maple Marketing. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Extension Service, Maple Marketing Task Force.
Perrin, Noel. 1978. “The two faces of Vermont.” Pp. 86–93 inFirst Person Rural. New York: Godine.
Piore, Michael J. and Charles F. Sabel. 1984.The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic.
Raymond, Lyle S. and Fred E. Winch. 1968.Maple Syrup Production in New York State: A Commentary on Its Development History, the Distribution of Production and Significance for Community Resource Development in Rural Fringe Farm Areas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, NY State College of Agriculture.
Russell, Howard S. 1982.A Long, Deep Furrow: Three Centuries of Farming in New England. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
Smith, DuBois T. (1969).Management Practices in Maple Syrup Production in New York. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics Bulletin.
Thompson, Bruce. 1978.Syrup Trees. Fountain Hills, AZ: Walnut Press.
Thrift, Nigel. 1989. “Images of social change.” Pp. 12–42 inThe Changing Social Structure, edited by C. Hamnett, L. McDowell, and P. Sarre. London: Sage.
Urry, John. 1990. “The ‘consumption’ of tourism.”Sociology 24: 23–35.
Vaillancourt, Cyrille. 1934.L'Industrie du Sucre d'Érable dans la Province de Québec. Lévis, Canada: Les Producteurs de Sirop d'Érable.
Ward, Neil. 1993. “The agricultural treadmill and the rural environment in the post-productivist era.”Sociologia Ruralis 33: 348–364.
Willits, C. O. and Claude H. Hills. 1976.Maple Sirup Producers Manual. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Agriculture Handbook No. 134.
Wonnacott, Enid. 1992. “Certified organic maple syrup — Who decides?”The Natural Farmer 2(12): 14.
Additional information
Clare Hinrichs is a Research Associate at the Center for the Environment and Waste Management Institute of Cornell University. Her research interests include the social and economic restructuring of rural areas, land use planning, and environmental justice.
Suppose you buy a quart of syrup in the village store in South Strafford. It comes in a can with brightly colored pictures on it. These pictures show men carrying sap pails on yokes, sugarhouses with great stacks of logs outside, teams of horses, and all the rest. They are distinctly last-stand pictures.
But suppose you decide to go into the sugaring business for yourself. When you write away for advice, you get a go-modern or private-reality answer. You are told not to hang pails at all, much less carry them to the sugarhouse on a yoke. Instead, install pipes. Don't bother to cut any four-foot logs, you're told, even though your hills are covered with trees. Texas oil gives a better-controlled heat. And finally, your instructions say, the right way to market the stuff is to put it in cans that show men carrying sap pails, sugarhouses with great stacks of logs ....
Noel Perrin, “The Two Faces of Vermont” inFirst Person Rural (1978: 87)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hinrichs, C.C. Off the treadmill? Technology and tourism in the north American maple syrup industry. Agric Hum Values 12, 39–47 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02218073
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02218073