Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Alternative mating tactics in male white-faced dragonflies (Leucorrhinia intacta): plasticity of tactical options and consequences for reproductive success

  • Papers
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Alternative tactics used by males to obtain mates usually are associated with genetic and/or phenotypic differences between the behavioral morphs. This system of white-faced dragonfly (Leucorrhinia intacta) alternatives is characterized by plasticity of tactical options for individual males. Males may act either as territorials, and defend small perch-centered territories on the study pond, or they act as transients, spending most of their time in vegetation surrounding the pond and sallying out at intervals in search of mates. The two tactics remain in constant proportions over a broad range of densities, so transients do not result only from a ‘filling in’ of suitable territorial sites. Males adopt tactics independently from day to day, with no significant influences of phenotypic variation, priority of arrival at the breeding site, or prior success in a role. We interpret this system as based on conditional, frequency-dependent choice of alternatives by a population of males not differing significantly in their abilities to employ one tactic or the other, but we cannot exclude entirely the possibility of mixed strategies. Average daily mating success is equal for territorial and transient males, supporting predictions of mixed and conditional ESS hypotheses. Males of each tactic obtain matings daily in proportion to their representation in the population for most data samples. Deviations from the expected mating success provide no information of use in selecting one or the other tactic on subsequent days. We suggest this system of alternatives represents a conditional mating strategy, in which males adopt tactics based on the availability of perches relative to oviposition substrate and on interactions within and between tactics that are influenced by the relative frequencies of territorial and transient males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock, J. (1979) The evolution of intraspecific diversity in male reproductive strategies in some bees and wasps. InSexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds) pp. 381–402. Academic Press, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, J., Jones, C. E. and Buchmann, S. L. (1977) Male mating strategies in the bee,Centris pallida.Amer. Natur. 111, 145–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austad, S. (1984) Alternative male reproductive behaviors.Amer. Zool. 24, 309–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgia, G. (1982) Experimental changes in resource structure and male density: size-related differences in mating success in maleScatophaga stercoraria.Evolution 36, 307–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann, J., Grafen, A. and Dawkins, R. (1979) Evolutionarily stable nesting strategy in a digger wasp.J. Theor. Biol. 77, 473–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade, W. (1980) Alternative male reproductive behaviors.Fla. Ent. 63, 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade, W. (1981) Alternative males strategies: genetic differences in crickets.Science 212, 563–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, P. J. and Wolf, L. L. (1974) Temporal leks as a mating system in a temperate zone dragonfly (Odonata: Libellulidae) I.Plathemis lydia.Behaviour 51, 49–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro, T. M. and Bateson, P. (1986) Organization and ontogeny of alternative tactics.Anim. Behav. 34, 1483–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., Greenwood, P. J., and Powell, R. P. (1982)Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. J. (1980)Practical Non-Parametric Statistics, 2nd edn. John Wiley, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, P. (1962)A Biology of Dragonflies. Witherby, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croze, H. J. (1970) Searching image in carrion crows.Z. Tierpsychol., Beiheft 5, 85 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtsinger, J. W. (1986) Stay times inScatophaga and the theory of evolutionarily stable strategies.Amer. Natur. 128, 130–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. B. (1982) Behaviour and competition for scarce resources. InCurrent Problems in Sociobiology (Kings College Sociobiology Group, eds) pp. 363–80. Cambridge University Press, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. B. and Houston, A. I. (1981) Owners and satellites: the economics of territory defence in the pied wagtail,Motacilla alba.J. Anim. Ecol. 50, 157–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1980) Good strategy or evolutionarily stable strategy? InSociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture? (G. W. Barlow and J. Silverborg, eds) pp. 331–67. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominey, W. D. (1984) Alternative mating tactics and evolutionarily stable strategies.Amer. Zool. 24: 385–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1982) Interspecific variations in mating strategy. InPerspectives in Ethology, V. Ontogeny (P. Bateson and P. Klopfer, eds) pp. 385–431. Plenum, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincke, O. M. (1985) Alternative mate-finding tactics in a non-territorial damselfly (Odonata: Coenagrionidae).Anim. Behav. 33, 1124–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S. D. and Lucas, H. L. (1970) On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica19, 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, C. S. and May, M. L. (1983) Energy expenditures and food intake of territorial malePachydiplax longipennis (Odonata: Libellulidae).Ecol. Ent. 8, 283–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R., Morris, M. R. and Nelson, C. E. (1987) Conditional evolutionarily stable strategies.Anim. Behav. 35, 507–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, H. C., Daniel, R. E., Perrill, S. A. and Schramm, S. (1987) Mating behaviour and male mating success in the green tree frog.Anim. Behav. 35, 1490–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, M. D. and Shelly, T. E. (1985) Alternative mating strategies in a desert grasshopper: evidence of density dependence.Anim. Behav. 33, 1192–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. (1985) Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon.Nature 313, 47–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. R. and Charnov, E. L. (1980) Alternative male life histories in bluegill sunfish.Pr. Nat. Acad. Sci. (US) 77, 6937–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, K. (1985) Alternative mating strategies in the water striderGerris elongatus (Heteroptera, Gerridae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16, 301–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. F. (1985) Reproductive behavior ofLeucorrhinia hudsonica (Selys) (Odonata: Libellulidae).J. Kansas Ent. Soc. 57, 580–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. D. (1978) The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs.Evolution 32, 850–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. D. (1979) Estimating reproductive success in natural populations.Amer. Natur. 114, 221–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. D. (1981) Male age-size distribution and male mating success in bullfrogs. InNatural Selection and Social Behavior. (R. Alexander and D. W. Tinkle, eds) pp. 61–77. Chiron Press, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. D. (1984) Alternative mating behaviors of young male bullfrogs.Amer. Zool. 24, 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown, A. (1986) Satellites and sneakers: opportunistic male breeding tactics in pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 425–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lank, D. B. and Smith C. M. (1987) Conditional lekking in ruff (Philomachus pugnax).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20, 137–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBouef, B. J. (1974) Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals.Amer. Zool. 14, 163–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982)Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVey, M. (1981) Lifetime reproductive tactics in a territorial dragonfly,Erythemis simplicollis. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Rockefeller University, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinksi, M. (1986) A review of competitive resource sharing under constraints in sticklebacks.J. Fish Biol. 29 (Suppl. A), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajunen, V. I. (1964) Aggressive behaviour inLeucorrhinia caudalis Charp. (Odon., Libellulidae).Ann. Zool. Fenn. 1, 357–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajunen, V. I. (1966) The influence of population density on the territorial behaviour ofLeucorrhinia rubicunda L. (Odon., Libellulidae).Ann. Zool. Fenn. 3, 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behavior.J. Theor. Biol. 47, 223–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. (1978) Searching for mates. InBehavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds) pp. 214–44. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. (1982) Phenotype-limited evolutionarily stable strategies. InCurrent Problems in Sociobiology (Kings College Sociobiology Group, eds) pp. 173–202. Cambridge University Press, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. and Maynard Smith, J. (1987) The distribution of stay times inScatophaga: a reply to Curtsinger.Amer. Natur. 129, 621–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. and Sutherland, W. J. (1986) Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype limited ideal-free models.Anim. Behav. 34, 1222–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrill, S. A., Gerhardt, H. C. and Daniel, R. (1978) Sexual parasitism in the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea).Science 200, 1179–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrill, S. A., Gerhardt, H. C. and Daniel, R. (1982) Mating strategy shifts in male green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea): an experimental study.Anim. Behav. 30, 43–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert, S. E. and Hammerstein, P. (1983) Game theory in the ecological context.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14, 377–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, D. (1981) On the evolution of alternative mating strategies. InLimits to Action: The Allocation of Individual Behavior (J. E. R. Staddon, ed.) pp. 65–100. Academic Press, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, D. (1984) Resource acquisition and alternative mating strategies in water striders.Amer. Zool. 24, 345–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelly, T. E. and Greenfield M. D. (1985) Alternative mating strategies in a desert grasshopper: a transitional analysis.Anim. Behav. 33, 1211–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, J. M. (1975) Factors influencing female choice in the lek mating system of the ruff.Living Bird 14, 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjónsdóttir, H. and Parker, G. (1981) Dung fly struggles: evidence for assessment strategy.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 8, 219–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siva-Jothy, M. T. (1987) Variation in copulation duration and the resultant degree of sperm removal inOrthetrum cancellatum (L.) (Libellulidae: Odonata).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20, 147–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. J. (1973) Describing sequences of behavior. InPerspectives in Ethology (P. P. Bateson and P. H. Klopfer, eds) pp. 131–54. Plenum, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1969)Biometry. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. R. and Wilcox, R. S. (1986) The mating systems of two hybridizing species of water striders (Gerridae). II. Alternative tactics of males and females.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W. J. and Parker, G. A. (1985) Distribution of unequal competitors. InBehavioural Ecology: Ecological Consequences of Adaptive Behaviour. (R. A. Sibly and R. H. Smith, eds) Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. (1981)Panorpa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) scorpionflies: systems for understanding resourcedefense polygyny and alternative male reproductive efforts.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 355–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. and Alcock, J. (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsubaki, Y. and Ono, T. (1987) Effects of age and body size on the male territorial system of the dragonfly,Nannophya pygmaea Rambur (Odonata: Libellulidae).Anim. Behav. 35, 518–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueda, T. (1979) Plasticity of the reproductive behaviour in a dragonfly,Sympetrum parvulum Bartehnoff, with reference to the social relationship of males and the density of territories.Res. Pop. Ecol. 21, 135–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rhijn, J. G. (1973) Behavioural dimorphism in male ruffs,Philomachus pugnax (L.).Behaviour 47, 153–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rhijn, J. G. (1983) On the maintenance of alternative strategies in the ruffPhilomachus pugnax (L.).Ibis 125, 482–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vepsalainen, K. and Nummelin, M. (1985) Male territoriality in the waterstriderLimnoporus rufoscutellatus.Ann. Zool. Fenn. 22, 441–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage, J. K. (1979) Adaptive significance of postcopulatory guarding of mates and nonmates by maleCalopteryx maculata (Odonata).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6, 147–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, E. C. (1982) Alternative mating tactics and the law of diminishing returns: the satellite threshold model.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10, 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, E. C. and Wolf, L. L. (1984) By Jove!!! Why do alternative mating tactics assume so many different forms?Amer. Zool. 24, 333–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. I. (1983) The effect of size on the mating behaviour of the dung flySepsis cynipsea.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13, 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, L. L. and Waltz, E. C. (1984) Dominions and cost variation of aggressive behavior in breeding maleLeucorrhinia intacta (Hagen).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14, 107–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, L. L. and Waltz, E. C. Oviposition site selection and spatial predictability of female white-faced dragonfliesLeucorrhinia intacta (Hagen).J. Ethol. (in press).

  • Wolf, L. L., Waltz, E. C., McIlvain, J., Wakeley, K. and Klockowski, D. Copulation duration, sperm competition, and penis morphology of white-faced dragonfliesLeucorrhinia intacta (Hagen) (Odonata: Libellulidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Lyman Hall, Syracuse University, 13244, Syracuse, New York, USA

    Edward C. Waltz & Larry L. Wolf

Authors
  1. Edward C. Waltz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Larry L. Wolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waltz, E.C., Wolf, L.L. Alternative mating tactics in male white-faced dragonflies (Leucorrhinia intacta): plasticity of tactical options and consequences for reproductive success. Evol Ecol 2, 205–231 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214284

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214284

Keywords

Search

Navigation