Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behavioral strategies of aphid hyperparasitoids to escape aggression by honeydew-collecting ants

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyzed the behavioral interactions between two species of honeydew-collecting ants (Lasius niger, Myrmica laevinodis) and foraging females of four species of aphid hyperparasitoids (Aphidencyrtus aphidivorus, Dendrocerus carpenteri, Pachyneuron aphidis, Asaphes vulgaris) usingAphis fabae ssp.cirsiiacanthoidis andLysiphlebus cardui on thistles as aphid and primary parasitoid, respectively. The observed interaction patterns and foraging parameters varied within hyperparasitoid species and revealed different strategies based upon behavioral and morphological constraints.D. carpenteri generally tried to avoid ant encounters. This avoidance strategy was successful in interactions withM. laevinodis but failed when encountering the more aggressiveL. niger, which caused about 26% adult mortality. In contrast,A. aphidivorus, P. aphidis, andA. vulgaris possess jumping ability and were hardly exposed to mortality risks. The escape reaction “jump off” was used as soon as ants made physical contact with foraging females. While the flight strategy ofP. aphidis is connected with cryptic movement patterns without avoidance behavior,A. aphidivorus first avoided ants and jumped off only as a last resort. Similar patterns, but less expressive, are displayed byA. vulgaris. We suggest that these different strategies are responsible for different foraging success in ant-attended resources in field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attygalle, A. B., McCormick, K. D., Blankespoor, C. L., Eisner, T., and Meinwald, J. (1993). Azamacrolides: A family of alkaloids from the pupal defense secretion of a ladybird beetle (Epilachna varivestis).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 5204–5208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayre, G. L. (1962).Pseudometagea schwarzii (Ashm.) (Eucharitidae: Hymenoptera), a parasite ofLasius neoniger Emery (Formicidae: Hymenoptera).Can. J. Zool. 40: 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, C. E. (1991). Direct and indirect interactions between ants (Pheidole megacephala), scales (Coccus viridis) and plants (Pluchea indica).Oecologia 87: 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, C. J. (1962). Effect of the ant,Lasius niger, on insects preying on small populations ofAphis fabae Scop. on bean plants.Ann. Appl. Biol. 50: 669–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, B. R. (1961). The influence of ants upon parasites, predators and scale insects.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 54: 543–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, G. A. (1973). Effect ofFormica obscuripes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on the predatorprey relationship betweenHyperaspis congressis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) andToumeyella numismaticum (Homoptera: Coccidae).Can. Entomol. 105: 1113–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, C. (1984). Differential benefits from ant-attendance to two species of Homoptera on New York ironweed.J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 715–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, R. (1987). Interactions involving plants, homoptera, and ants.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudjoe, J. H., Neuenschwander, P., and Copland, M. J. W. (1993). Interference by ants in biological control of the cassava mealybugPhenacoccus manihoti (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Ghana.Bull. Entomol. Res. 83: 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettner, K., and Liepert, C. (1994). Chemical mimicry and camouflage.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39: 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Hicks, K., Eisner, M., and Robson, D. S. (1978). “Wolf-in-sheep's-clothing” strategy of a predaceous insect larva.Science 199: 790–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Goetz, M., Aneshansley, D., Fersting-Arnold, G., and Meinwald, J. (1986). Defensive alkaloid in blood of Mexican bean beetle (Epilachna varivestis).Experientia 42: 204–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1990).The Ants, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübner, G. (1994).Interaktionen zwischen fouragierenden Blattlaushyperparasitoiden und honigtausammelnden Ameisen: Verhaltensstrategien in ameisenbelaufenen Ressourcen. Diploma thesis, University of Bayreuth.

  • Jiggins, C., Majerus, M. E. N., and Gough, U. (1993). Ant defence of colonies ofAphis fabae Scopoli (Hemiptera: Aphididae), against predation by ladybirds.Br. J. Entomol. Nat. Hist. 6: 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamijo, K., and Takada, H. (1983). A newEuneura species hyperparasitic onStomaphis aphids and a note on the genusGygaxia Delucchi.Akitu 55: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanuck, M. J., and Sullivan, D. J. (1992). Ovipositional behavior and larval developement ofAphidencyrtus aphidivorus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), an aphid hyperparasitoid.J. N.Y. Entomol. Soc. 100: 527–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K. J., Heady, S. E., and Nault, L. R. (1992). Influence of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on honeydew excretion and escape behaviors in a myrmecophile,Dalbulus quinquenotatus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), and its congeners.J. Insect Behav. 5: 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liepert, C., and Dettner, K. (1993). Recognition of aphid parasitoids by honeydew-collecting ants: The role of cuticular lipids in a chemical mimicry system.J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 2143–2153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer, M., and Völkl, W. (1993): Regulation of aphid populations by aphidiid wasps: Does parasitoid foraging behaviour of hyperparasitism limit impact?Oecologia 94: 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, H. (1994). The influence of ant-attendance on larval parasitism in Hawthorn psyllids (Homoptera: Psyllidae).Oecologia 99: 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, N. E., and Easteal, S. (1986). The selective advantage of attendant ants for the larvae of a lycaenid butterfly,Glaucopsyche lygdamus.J. Anim. Ecol. 55: 451–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, N. E., and Mead, P. S. (1981). Parasitoids as selective agents in the symbiosis between lycaenid butterfly caterpillars and ants.Science 211: 1185–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudd, J. H. (1987) Ant aphid mutualism. In Minks, A. K., and Harrewijn, P. (eds.),Aphids—Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control.World Crop Pests, Vol. 2A, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D. J. (1987). Insect hyperparasitism.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 32: 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D. J. (1988). Hyperparasites. In Minks, A. K., and Harrewijn, P. (eds.),Aphids—Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control.World Crop Pests, Vol. 2B, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takada, H., and Hashimoto, Y. (1985). Association of the root aphid parasitoidsAclitus sappaphis andParalipsis eikoae (Hymenoptera, Aphidiidae) with the aphid-attending antsPheidole fervida andLasius niger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Kontyu 53: 150–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tursch, B., Daloze, D., Dupont, M., Pasteels, J. M., and Tricot, M. C. (1971). A defensive alkaloid in a carnivorous beetle.Experientia 27: 1380–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Meer, R. K., Jouvenaz, D. P., and Wojcik, D. P. (1989). Chemical mimicry in a parasitoid (Hymenoptera: Eucharitidae) of fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 15: 2247–2261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S. B., and Scarborough, T. A. (1991). Interactions betweenSolenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae),Rhopalosiphum maidis (Homoptera: Aphididae) and the parasitoidLysiphlebus testaceipes Cresson (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 84: 158–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl, W. (1990).Fortpflanzungsstrategien bei Blattlausparasitoiden (Hymenoptera, Aphidiidae): Konsequenzen ihrer Interaktionen mit Wirten und Ameisen, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl, W. (1992). Aphids or their parasitoids: Who actually benefits from ant-attendance?J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl, W. (1995). Behavioral and morphological adaptations of the coccinellidPlatynaspis luteorubra for exploiting ant-attended resources.J. Insect Behav. 8: 653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl, W., and Mackauer, M. (1993). Interactions between ants attendingAphis fabae ssp. cirsiiacanthoidis on thistles and foraging parasitoid wasps.J. Insect Behav. 6: 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl, W., Hübner, G., and Dettner, K. (1994). Interactions betweenAlloxysta brevis (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Alloxystidae) and honeydew collecting ants: How an aphid hyperparasitoid overcomes ant aggression by chemical defense.J. Chem. Ecol. 20: 2621–2635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, M. J. (1963). Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing homptera.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 8: 307–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellenstein, G. (1930). Beiträge zur Systematik und Biologie der Rindenläuse (Lachnidae CB.).Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 17: 737–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojcik, D. P. (1989): Behavioral interactions between ants and their parasites.Fla. Entomol. 72: 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Tierökologie I, Universität Bayreuth, P.O. Box 10 1251, D-95440, Bayreuth, Germany

    Gerhard Hübner & Wolfgang Völkl

Authors
  1. Gerhard Hübner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wolfgang Völkl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hübner, G., Völkl, W. Behavioral strategies of aphid hyperparasitoids to escape aggression by honeydew-collecting ants. J Insect Behav 9, 143–157 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213729

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213729

Key Words

Search

Navigation