Skip to main content
Log in

Four theories of population change and the environment

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

It is clear from the discussion of the four principal frameworks used to study population and land use that there is no consensus on the relationship. Most of the debate has centered on the two rivalpolicies of the neoclassical economists and the classical economists or natural scientists. Consensus has been difficult to reach mainly because the empirical evidence is weak and inconclusive, and the diverse experiences of different regions make it difficult to generalize for policy. Because the linkage is unclear, it seems premature to conclude that curbing population growth is the only or most important remedy for land degradation.

It is relevant to note that this paper has focussed only on land degradation. It may be that population change plays a more conclusive role in affecting other aspects of the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernard, F., & Thom, D. (1981). Population pressure and human carrying capacity in selected locations of Machakos and Kitui districts.The journal of Developing Areas, 15(3): 381–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow, R. E. (1987). Population pressures and agricultural development in developing countries: A conceptual framework and recent evidence.World Development, 15(2): 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow, R., & Stupp, P. (1989).Effects of Population growth on rural development in Guatemala. Unpublished manuscript Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Carolina Population Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H., & Pingali, P. (1989). Population growth and technological change in agriculture. In K. Davis, M. Bernstam, & H. Sellers (Eds.).Population and resources in a changing world, pp. 367–385. Stanford: Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., & Brookfield, H. (1987).Land degradation and society. New York: Methuen and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1965).The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure. Chicago: Aldine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1981).Population and technological change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1970). Present and potential food production in developing countries. In W. Zelinsky, L. A. Kosinski, & R. M. Prothero (Eds.).Geography and a crowding world: A symposium on population pressures upon physical and social resources in the developing lands, pp. 100–113. New York, London, Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., Wolf, E., & Starke, L. (Eds.). (1987).State of the world 1987. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. & Jacobson, J. (1986).Our demographically divided world (Worldwatch Paper No. 74). Washington, D.C: Worldwatch Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, H. (1970). Some sociological considerations of population pressure on resources. In W. Zelinsky, L. A. Kosinski, & R. M. Prothero (Eds.).Geography and a crowding world: A symposium on population pressures upon physical and social resources in the developing lands, pp. 71–82. New York, London, Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A., & Watkins, S. C. (Eds.). (1986).The decline of fertility in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. (1986).Review of Population Growth and Economic Development: Policy Questions (NRC).Population and Development Review:12(3): 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., Bernstam, M., & Sellers, H. (Eds.). (1989).Population and resources in a changing world. Stanford: The Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P., & Ehrlich, A. (1979). The population bomb revisited.People (London),6(2): 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. & Holdren, J. (1987). Impact of population growth.Population, Resources, and the Environment.

  • Flew, A. (Ed.), (1970).An essay on the principle of population; and a summary view of the principle of population (Robert Thomas Malthus). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy, G., & Daly, H. (1989).Allocation, distribution and scale as determinants of environmental degradation: Case studies of Haiti, El Salvador and Costa Rica. (World Bank Environment Department Working Paper No. 19). Washington, D.C: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1979). Comments on Daly and Stiglitz. In K. Smith (Ed.).Scarcity and growth reconsidered, pp. 95–105. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P. S. (1970). Population and resource development in India. In W. Zelinsky, L. A. Kosinski, & R. M. Prothero (Eds.).Geography and a crowding world: A symposium on population pressures upon physical and social resources in the developing lands, pp. 424–441. New York, London, Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, G. M., Kassam, A. H., Naiken, L., Fischer, G., & Shah, M. M. (1983).Potential Population Supporting Capacities of Lands in the Developing World. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosier, R. (1984).Wood, energy and households — perspectives on rural Kenya. Sweden: The Beijer Institute and the Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. (1989). Impacts of trends in resources, environment and development on demographic prospects. In K. Davis, M. Bernstam, & H. Sellers (Eds.).Population and resources in a changing world, pp. 16–38. Stanford: Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., & Hotchkiss, D. (1988).Consequences of deforestation for women's time allocation, agricultural production, and nutrition in hill areas of Nepal. Washington, D.C: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, J. (1976). Population pressure and agricultural change in a land intensive economy.Journal of Development Studies, 13(1): 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabogunje, A. (1970). A typology of population pressure on resources in West Africa. In W. Zelinsky, L. A. Kosinski, & R. M. Prothero (Eds.).Geography and a crowding world: A symposium on population pressures upon physical and social resources in the developing lands, pp. 114–128. New York, London, Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, A. S. (1989). Global trends in forest resources. In K. Davis, M. Bernstam, & H. Sellers (Eds.).Population and resources in a changing world, pp. 289–304. Stanford: Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, P. (1970). Increasing agricultural output to help with the population “problem.” In W. Zelinsky, L. A. Kosinski, & R. M. Prothero (Eds.).Geography and a crowding world: A symposium on population pressures upon physical and social resources in the developing lands, pp. 83–94. New York, London, Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzner, J. (1982).Agriculture and population pressure in Sikka, llse of Flores. (Development Studies Centre Monograph No. 28). Canberra, Australia: The Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. (1980).The poverty of nations, the political economy of hunger and population. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1989). Population, environment, and conflict. In K. Davis, M. Bernstam, & H. Sellers (Eds.).Population and resources in a changing world, pp. 43–56. Stanford: Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1986).Population growth and economic development: policy questions. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, R. (1987). Population, resources, environment: An uncertain future.Population Bulletin, 42(2).

  • Repetto, R. (1989). Soil loss and population pressure on Java. In K. Davis, M. Bernstam, & H. Sellers (Eds.).Population and resources in a changing world, pp. 305–314. Stanford: Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadik, N. (1989). State of world population 1988. In K. Davis, M. Bernstam, & H. Sellers (Eds.).Population and resources in a changing world, pp. 503–530. Stanford: Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. P. (1989a, January). Paradox of population growth and environmental degradation. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Annual Meeting. San Francisco.

  • Shaw, R. P. (1989b, March). Population, environment and women: An analytical framework. UNFPA Interagency Consultative Meeting on Women, Population and the Environment. New York.

  • Shipton, P. (1989, June).How private property emerges in Africa: Directed and undirected land tenure reforms in densely settled areas south of the Sahara. Report to the Bureau of Program and Policy Coordination, USAID. Harvard University.

  • Shrestha, N. (1982). A preliminary report on population pressure and resources in Nepal.The Journal of Developing Areas, 16: 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (1983). Population pressure on the land: Analysis of trends past and future.World Development, 11(9): 825–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (1981).The ultimate resource. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. & Krutilla, J. (1979). The economics of natural scarcity: An interpretative introduction. In K. Smith (Ed.)Scarcity and growth reconsidered, pp. 1–35. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1984).Uneven development. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1979). Neoclassical analysis of resource economics. In K. Smith (Ed.).Scarcity and growth reconsidered, pp. 36–66. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonich, S. (1989). Processes and environmental destruction: A Central American case study.Population and Development Review, 15(2): 269–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, L. (1989). Demographic factors in resource depletion and environmental degradation in East African rangeland. In K. Davis, M. Bernstam, & H. Sellers (Eds.).Population and resources in a changing world, pp. 315–323. Stanford: Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warford, J., & Partow Z. (1989). Evolution of the World Bank's environmental policy.Finance and Development, 26(4): 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The National Research Council is the operating arm of the National Academy of Sciences. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jolly, C.L. Four theories of population change and the environment. Popul Environ 16, 61–90 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208003

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208003

Keywords

Navigation