Skip to main content
Log in

Population and environment: the evolution of the debate between optimists and pessimists

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential adverse effects of rapid population growth on human welfare and our natural environment have been the subject of lively debate since the time of Thomas Malthus. This debate has often been contentious with pessimists arguing that population growth has extensive harmful impacts and optimists claiming that advances in technology and smoothly operating markets can take care of society’s needs without irreversible damage to the environment. This essay summarizes the evolution of the positions of pessimists and optimists after the middle of the 20th century. From the 1950s to the late 1970s the international discussion of population and environment was dominated by concern about the potential negative impact of rapid population growth in the less developed world and by the feasibility of policy options for reducing the pace of growth. A reversal of this consensus occurred in the 1980 and 1990 s leading to a revisionist view that population growth was at best a minor problem. However, by the turn of the 21st century a broader population policy agenda evolved that included not only renewed interest in the unfavorable effects of population growth but also in other issues such as climate change, international migration, and rapid urbanization. A concluding section discusses the reasons why we don’t agree. Continuing disagreements between optimists and pessimists are now less about scientific facts and more about a host of economic, ethical, aesthetic, and political questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R., et al. (1991). The spread of HIV-1 in Africa: Sexual contact patterns and the predicted demographic impact of AIDS. Nature, 352, 581–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1997). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. (2013). Has the world really survived the population bomb? (Commentary on “how the world survived the population bomb: Lessons from 50 years of extraordinary demographic history”). Demography, 50(6), 2173–2181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow, R. (2021). In L. Hunter, C. Gray, & J. Veron (Eds.), Population and Agricultural Change, Chap. 17 in handbook on Population & Environment. Springer.

  • Binswanger, H., and Ruttan V (1978). Induced Innovation: Technology, Institutions and Development. Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D., & Williamson, J. (1998). Demographic transition and economic miracles in emerging Asia. World Bank Economic Review, 12(3), 419–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D., Canning, D., Fink, G., & Finlay, J. E. (2009). Fertility, female labor force participation, and the demographic dividend. Journal of Economic Growth, 14(2), 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J., & Hardee, K. (2019). Trends in contraceptive prevalence in sub-saharan Africa: The roles of family planning programs and education. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 23(3), 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J., & Hodgson, D. (2022). Fertility transition in the developing World. Springer.

  • Bongaarts, J., & Sinding, S. (2011). Family planning as an economic investment. SAIS Review of International Affairs, D31(2), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J., Gragnolati, M., Ahmed, A., & Corker, J. (2022). Population, Development and Policy. In J. May and J.Goldstone (Ed.), International Handbook of Population Policy. Springer.

  • Boserup, E. (1965). The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1981). Population and technological change: A study of long-term trends. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin.

  • Cleland, J., Phillips, J., Amin, S., & Kamal, G. (1994). The determinants of Reproductive Change in Bangladesh: Success in a Challenging Environment. World Bank Group.

  • Coale, A., & Hoover, E. (1958). Population Growth and Economic Development in Low-Income Countries: A case study of India’s prospects. Princeton University Press.

  • Cohen, S. (2012). London Summit puts Family Planning back on the agenda, offers New Lease on Life for millions of women and girls. Guttmacher Policy Review, 15(3), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossette, B. (2005). Reproductive health and the Millennium Development Goals: The missing link. Studies in Family Planning, 36(1), 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darroch, J., et al. (2017). Adding it up: Investing in Contraception and maternal and Newborn Health. 2017—Supplementary Tables. Guttmacher Institute.

  • Davis, K. (1967). Population policy: Will current programs succeed? Science, 158, 730–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeny, P. (1979). On the end of the Population Explosion. Population and Development Review, 5(1), 141–162.

  • Diffenbaugh, N. (2022). and Barnes E. Data-driven predictions of the time remaining until critical global warming thresholds are reached PNAS 120 (6): e2207183120

  • Ehrlich, P. (1968). The Population Bomb. Ballantine Books.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2022). FAOSTAT online database. Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org

  • Freedman, R., & Takeshita, J. (1969). Family planning in Taiwan: An experiment in social change. Princeton University.

  • Gleditsch, N. P. (2021). This time is different! Or is it? NeoMalthusians and environmental optimists in the age of climate change. Journal of Peace Research, 58, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320969785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther, I., & Harttgen, K. (2016). Desired fertility and number of children born across time and space. Demography, 53(1), 55–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, P. (1967). Family planning and population: A book review article. Demography, 4(1), 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, D., & Hodge, A. (2009). The effect of population growth on economic growth: A meta-regression analysis of the macroeconomic literature. Population and Development Review, 35(2), 221–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M., & Williamson, J. (1997). Age structure dynamics in Asia and dependence on foreign capital. Population and Development Review, 23(2), 261–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge.

  • International Panel on Climate Change (2022a). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/

  • International Panel on Climate Change (2022b). The IPCC sixth assessment report (AR6): Working Group III contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report, Technical summary.

  • Ivanovich, C., Sun, T., Gordon, D., et al. (2023). Future warming from global food consumption. Nature Climate Change, 13, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., & Lee, R. (Eds.). (1987). Population Growth and Economic Development: Issues and evidence. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabir, K., Baldos, U. L. C., & Hertel, T. (2022). The new malthusian challenge in the Sahel: Prospects for improving food security in Niger. Food Sec. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01319-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, A. (2001). The population debate in historical perspective: Revisionism revised. In N. Birdsall, A. C. Kelley, & S. Sinding (Eds.), Population matters: Demographic change, economic growth, and poverty in the developing world (pp. 24–54). Oxford University.

  • Kelley, A., & Schmidt, R. (1995). Aggregate population and economic growth correlations: The role of the components of demographic change. Demography, 32(4), 543–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, A., & Schmidt, R. (2001). Economic and demographic change: A synthesis of models, findings, and perspectives. In N. Birdsall, A. Kelley, & S. Sinding (Eds.), Population matters: Demographic change, economic growth, and poverty in the developing world (pp. 67–105). Oxford University.

  • Kelley, A., & Schmidt, R. (2005). Evolution of recent economic-demographic modeling: A synthesis. Journal of Population Economics, 18(2), 275–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikstra, J. S., Mastrucci, A., Min, J., Riahi, K., & Rao, N. D. (2021). Decent living gaps and energy needs around the world. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 095006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1967). Population and economic growth. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 111(3), 170–193.

  • Lam, D. (2011). How the World survived the Population Bomb: Lessons from 50 years of extraordinary demographic history. Demography, 48(4), 1231–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R., & Mason, A. (2006). What is the demographic dividend? Finance and Development, 43(3), 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg, B. (2001). The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. Cambridge, UK.

  • Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens, I. I. I., W (1972). Limits to growth. Universe Books.

  • Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J., Rao, N., & Oswald, Y. (2020). Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario. Global Environmental Change, 65, 102168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (1971). Rapid Population Growth: Consequences and Policy Implications. Johns Hopkins Press for the National Academies of Sciences.

  • National Academy of Sciences. (1986). Population Growth and Economic Development. National Academy of Sciences.

  • National Research Council. (1986). Population Growth and Economic Development: Policy questions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, B., MacKellar, L., Lutz, W., & Wexler, L. (2001). Population and Climate Change. Cambridge.

  • Piotrow, P. T. (1973). World Population Crisis: The United States response. Netherlands: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L. (1994). Desired fertility and the impact of population policies. Population and Development Review, 20(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (1981). The Ultimate Resource. Princeton University Press.

  • Smil, V. (2022). How the world really works: A scientist’s guide to our past. Present and Future. Penguin.

  • Starbird, E., Norton, M., & Marcus, R. (2016). Investing in family planning: Key to achieving the sustainable development goals. Global Health: Science and Practice, 4(2), 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2006). The economics of climate change, the Stern review. Cambridge

  • United Nations Population Division. (2004). World Population to 2300. United Nations.

  • United Nations Population Division (2015). World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, United Nations.

  • United Nations Population Division. (2019). International Migration 2019. United Nations.

  • United Nations Population Division. (2020). World Fertility and Family Planning 2020: Highlights. United Nations.

  • United Nations Population Division. (2022a). World Population prospects: The 2022 revision. United Nations.

  • United Nations Population Division. (2022b). World Contraceptive Use 2022. United Nations.

  • United Nations Population Fund (2004). Program of action. Adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo. United Nations Population Fund.

  • United Nations Statistics Division (2016). Sustainable development goals, http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/.

  • USAID/Africa Bureau, USAID/Population and Reproductive Health, Ethiopia Federal Ministry of Health, Malawi Ministry of Health & Rwanda Ministry of Health. (2012). Three Successful Sub-Saharan Africa Family Planning Programs: Lessons for Meeting the MDGs. Africa Bureau USAID.

  • World Bank. (2015). Global monitoring Report 2015/2016: Development goals in an era of demographic change. World Bank Group.

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Bongaarts.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bongaarts, J. Population and environment: the evolution of the debate between optimists and pessimists. Popul Environ 45, 11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-023-00424-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-023-00424-5

Keywords

Navigation