Skip to main content
Log in

Reflections on sustainability, population growth, and the environment

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The related terms, “sustainable” and “sustainability,” have become popular and are used to describe a wide variety of activities which are generally ecologically laudable. At the same time, the term “compromise” is heard more frequently because the needs of the environment often are in conflict with the needs of humans. A brief examination of the question of compromise shows that a series of ten compromises, each of which saves 70% of the remaining environment, results in the saving of only 3% of the environment. Judging from the ways in which the terms “sustainable” and “sustainability” are used, their definitions are not very precise, especially when compromises are involved. An attempt is made here to give firm definition to these terms and to translate the definition into a series of laws and hypotheses which, it is hoped, will clarify the implications of their use. These are followed by a series of observations and predictions that relate to “sustainability.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, P.H. (1990). Dialog on the future of agriculture (Editorial).Science 249: 457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abernethy, V.D. (1993a).Population politics: The choices that shape our future. N.Y: Insight Books, Plenum Press, pp.245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abernethy, V.D. (1993b). The demographic transition revisited: Lessons for foreign aid and U.S. immigration policy.Ecological Economics, 8, 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, A.A. (1986). Sustained availability, a management program for non-renewable resources.American Journal of Physics 54: 398–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Sustained availability” involves having the rate of use of a finite nonrenewable resource decline steadily at a rate that guarantees that the resource will last forever.

  • Bartlett, A.A. (March, 1985). Book review.American Journal of Physics 53: 282–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, A.A. (April, 1990). The future of fusion.Physics and Society 19: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth (1971).Collected papers, Vol.II, pp.137–142. Foreword to T.R. Malthus,Population, The First Essay. Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. et al. (1994).The state of the world, 1994. N.Y: W.W. Norton Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G.H. (1987).Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development. N.Y: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, H.S.D., Freeman, C., Jahoda, M., & Pavitt, K.L.R. (Eds.). (1973).Models of doom: A critique of Limits to Growth. N.Y: Universe Books, New York City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for the National Institute for the Environment (Sept. 1993).Proposal for a National Institute for the Environment. Washington, D.C: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. (1990). Sustainable Growth—an impossibility theorem.Development, 3(4),45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (June, 1993).Sustainable development and the Environmental Protection Agency, report to the Congress. EPA 230-R-93-005. Washington, D.C: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • The EPA report attributed this statement to Governor Bill Clinton and Senator Al Gore,Putting People First: How We Can All Change America, (Times Books, New York City, 1992), p.94–95

  • Ehrlich, P. & Holdren, J. (1971). The impact of population growth.Science 171: 1212–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, M.S. Jr. (June 8, 1992). Fact and Comment,Forbes Magazine, p.25.

  • Giampietro, M., Bukkens, S.G.F., & Pimentel, D. (1992). Limits to population size: Three scenarios of energy interaction between human society and ecosystem.Population and Environment 14: 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M. & Pimentel, D. (1993). The tightening conflict: Population, energy use, and the ecology of agriculture.N.P.G. Forum. Teaneck, N.J: Negative Population Growth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons.Science 162: 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1993).Living within limits, p.199–203. N.Y: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.D. (Feb. 1994). The coming anarchy.The Atlantic Monthly, pp.44–76.

  • Kemp, J. (Jan. 27, 1992). quoted inHigh Country News, (Paonia, CO), p.4.

  • May, R.M. (March, 1993). The end of biological history? Book review.Scientific American, pp. 146–149.

  • Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W.W. (1972).The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. N.Y: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popline (Nov./Dec., 1993). World Population News Service, p.4.

  • Ramos, F. (Nov./Dec. 1993).Popline. World Population News Service, p.1.

  • Sevareid, E. (December 29, 1970). CBS News. Quoted in T.L. Martin,Malice in Blunderland, (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York City, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitarz, D. (Ed.). (1993).Agenda 21: The Earth summit strategy to save our planet. Boulder, CO: EarthPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, J.B. (Jan. 1989).Scientific American, p.39.

  • Yates, B. (1983).The decline and fall of the American automobile industry. N.Y: Empire Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartlett, A.A. Reflections on sustainability, population growth, and the environment. Popul Environ 16, 5–35 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208001

Keywords

Navigation