Skip to main content
Log in

Barriers to social network interventions with persons with severe and persistent mental illness: A survey of mental health case managers

  • Special Section: Networks and Mental Health
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to empirically assess the existence, strength, and relative influence of barriers to social network interventions for persons with severe mental disability which have been cited in the literature, a survey of the knowledge and attitudes of social networks and social network interventions of eighty mental health case managers and case management supervisors was conducted. Findings indicate gaps in case managers' level of knowledge of social networks, with items based on empirical knowledge about social networks and severe mental disability least likely to be answered correctly. Case managers both perceive, and have experienced, a significant number of obstacles that affect their ability to develop social network interventions-system barriers (paperwork, caseload size, lack of case manager time, etc.), community barriers (stigma and lack of resources), and client/family barriers (lack of interest in social networks, clients having a “burnt out” network, clients not wanting to identify social network needs, etc.). Case managers cited fiew major barriers pertaining to their own level of knowledge, skills, or interest in, social network interventions. Strategies to address identified barriers are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biegel, D. & Tracy, E. (1993).Natural supports project. Final Report to the Cuyahoga County Community Mental Health Board. Cleveland: Center for Practice Innovations, Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University.

  • Biegel, D.E., Tracy, E.M., & Corvo, K. (1994). Strengthening social networks: Intervention strategies for mental health case managers.Health and Social Work, 19(3), 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biegel, D.E., Shore, B.K., & Gordon, E. (1984).Building support networks of the elderly: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C.I., & Sokolovsky, J. (1978). Schizophrenia and social networks: Ex-patients in the inner city.Schizophrenia Bulletin, 4, (4), 546–560.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. & Wills, T.A. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 98 (2), 310–357.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D.L., & Tatum, E. (1983). Networks and the chronic patient. In D.L. Cutler (Ed.),Effective aftercare for the 1980's. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, A.B. (1978). Psychological costs of schizophrenia to the family.Social Work, 355–359.

  • Kisthardt, W.E. (1992). A strengths model of case management: The principles and functions of a helping partnership with persons with persistent mental illness. In D. Saleebey (Ed.),The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, L.F., Bagarozzi, D.A., & Pollane, L.D. (1984). Case management in mental health.Health and Social Work, 9 (3), 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, R.C., & Seidman, E. (1986). A social network approach and the revolving door patient.Schizophrenia Bulletin, 12 (2), 262–273.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Mental Health. (1987).Toward a model plan for a comprehensive community based mental health system. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, PHS, ADAMHA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, E.M., Defrancisco, D., Wood, P., Frazier, H. & Crowder, J.A. (1975). A psychosocial kinship model for family therapy.American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 1246–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, C.A. (1992). The strengths perspective of case management with persons suffering from severe mental illness. In D. Saleebey (Ed.),The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts-DeGennaro, M. (1987). Developing case management as a practice model.Social Casework, 68, 466–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A. & Babbie, E. (1989).Research methods for social work. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S. & Bradburn, N.M. (1982).Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, E.M. & Biegel, D. (1994). Preparing social workers for social network interventions in mental health practice.Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 10(1/2), 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, E.M., Biegel, D., & Corvo, K. (1991).Training program for case managers: Social network interventions with persons with severe mental disabilities. Report to the Cuyahoga County Community Mental Health Board. Cleveland: Center for Practice Innovations, Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biegel, D.E., Tracy, E.M. & Song, Ly. Barriers to social network interventions with persons with severe and persistent mental illness: A survey of mental health case managers. Community Ment Health J 31, 335–349 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207520

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207520

Keywords

Navigation