Skip to main content
Log in

Methods for synthesizing ectomycorrhizas and their effect on mycorrhizal development

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The different methods used for synthesizing ectomycorrhizae since Melin's first experiments were reviewed and evaluated. A non-aseptic growth pouch method was proposed that allowed for the formation of ectomycorrhizae on several species of Pinaceae and of actinorhizal and non-actinorhizal angiosperms including woody cuttings. More than 30 fungal species thus tested formed ectomycorrhizae. In most cases full ectomycorrhiza formation required 3–10 days after inoculation. The method allowed for chronosequential destructive (fixation) and non-destructive (photography) observations. It was particularly useful for the description of extramatrical phase development including hyphal strands, sclerotia and fruit body primordia formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melin E 1922 Untersuchungen über die Larix-Mykorrhiza. I. Synthese der Mykorrhiza in Reinkultur. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 16, 161–196.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hacskaylo E 1953 Pure culture synthesis of pine mycorrhizae in terralite. Mycologia 45, 971–975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Trappe J M 1962. Fungus associates of ectotrophic mycorrhizae. Bot. Rev. 28, 538–606.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Melin E and Nilsson H 1950 Transfer of radioactive phosphorus to pine seedlings by means of mycorrhizal hyphae. Physiol. Plant. 3, 88–92

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marx D H and Zak B 1965 Effect of pH on mycorrhizal formation of slash pine in asepticulture. For. Sci. 11, 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richard C and Fortin J A 1970 Les mycorhizes duPicea mariana (Mill.) BSP.: Aspects morphologiques, anatomiques et systématiques. Nat. Can. 97, 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richard C and Fortin J A 1975 Rôle protecteur duSuillus granulatus contre leMycelium radicis atrovirens sur des semis duPinus resinosa. Can. J. For. Res. 5 452–456.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trappe J M 1962Cenococcum graniforme, its distribution, ecology, mycorrhiza formation, and inherent variation. Ph.D. Diss. Univ. Washington, Seattle. USA 148 p.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pachlewska J 1968 Investigations on mycorrhizal symbiosis ofPinus sylvestris in pure culture on agar. Prace Inst. Badaw. Lesn. 345, 3–76.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pachlewski R and Pachlewska J 1974 Studies on symbiotic properties of mycorrhizal fungi of pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) with the aid of the method of mycorrhizal synthesis in pure cultures on agar. Forest Research Institute, Warsaw, 228 p.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mason P A 1975 The genetics of mycorrhizal associations betweenAmanita muscaria andBetula verrucosa. The Development and Function of Roots. Eds. J G Torrey and D T Clarkson. Academic Press, New-York and London, pp 567–574.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mason P A 1980 Aseptic synthesis of sheathing ectomycorrhizas.In Tissue Culture Methods for Plant Pathologists. Eds. D S Ingram and J P Helgeson. Blackwell Scientific publications, Oxford, London, Edinburgh Boston Melbourne, pp 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giltrap N J 1979 Experimental studies on the establishment and stability of ectomycorrhizas. Ph. D. Thesis. Univ. of Sheffield, UK 196 p.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sohn R F 1981Pisolithus tinctorius forms long ectomy corrhiza and alters root development in seedlings ofPinus resinosa. Can. J. Bot. 59, 2129–2134.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bigg W L and Alexander I J 1981 A culture unit for the study of nutrient uptake by intact mycorrhizal plants under aseptic conditions. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 13, 77–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nylund J E 1981 The formation of ectomycorrhiza in conifers: Structural and physiological studies with special reference to the mycobiont,Piloderme bicolor. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Uppsala, Sweden, 34 p.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Skinner M F and Bowen G D 1974 The uptake and translocation of phosphate by mycelial strands on pine mycorrhizas. Soil Biol. Biochem. 6, 53–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Skinner M F and Bowen G D 1974 The penetration of soil by mycelial strands of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem. 6, 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fortin J A 1965 Synthesis of mycorrhizae on explants of the root-hypocotyl ofPinus sylvestris L. Can. J. Bot. 44, 1087–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fortin JA and Piché Y 1979 Cultivation ofPinus strobus root-hypocotyl explants for synthesis of ectomycorrhizae. New Phytol. 83, 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Blakeslee G M 1977 Communication presented during a special session. Third North American Conference on Mycorrhizae.

  22. Mullette K J 1976 Studies of Eucalypt Mycorrhizas. I. A Method of mycorrhiza induction inEucalyptus gummifera (Gaertn. and Hochr.) byPisolithus tinctorius (Pers.)Coker and Couch. Aust. J. Bot. 24, 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lalonde M 1979 Techniques and observations of the nitrogen-fixing Alnus root nodule symbiosis.In Recent Advances in Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Ed. N. S. Subba Rao Oxford and I. B. H. Publication, New-Delhi, pp 421–434.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fortin J A, Piché Y and Lalonde M 1980 Technique for the observation of early morphological changes during ectomycorrhiza formation. Can. J. Bot. 58, 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Piché Y and Fortin J A 1982 Development of mycorrhizae, extramatrical mycelium and sclerotia onPinus strobus seedlings. New Phytol. 91, 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hewitt E J 1966 Sand and Water Culture Methods used in the Study of Plant Nutrition. Tech. Comm. 22 (2nd edition revised). Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, London, 431 p.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Normand P and Lalonde M 1982 Evaluation of Frankia strains isolated from provenances of twoAlnus species. Can. J. Microbiol. (In press).

  28. Warrington S J, Black H D and Coons L B 1981 Entry ofPisolithus tinctorius hyphae intoPinus taeda roots. Can. J. Bot, 59, 2135–2139.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dominik T 1969 Key to ectotrophic mycorrhizae. Folia For. Pol. Ser. A. 15, 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zak B 1973. Classification of ectomycorrhizae.In ectomycorrhizae. Eds. G C Marks and T T Kozlowski. Academic Press, New-York, pp 43–78.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Piché Y, Fortin J A and Lafontaine J G 1981 Cytoplasmic phenols and polysaccharides in ectomycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal short roots of pine. New Phytol. 88, 695–703.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Molina R 1981 Ectomycorrhizal specificity in the genus Alnus. Can. J. Bot. 59, 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gaie W and Heinemann P 1980 Mycorhization du genreBetula parPisolithus arhizus, en conditions axéniques. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 50, 375–383.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marx D H and Ross E W 1970 Aseptic synthesis of ectomycorrhizae onPinus Taeda by basisdiopores ofThelephora terrestris. Can J. Bot. 48, 197–198.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fortin, J.A., Piché, Y. & Godbout, C. Methods for synthesizing ectomycorrhizas and their effect on mycorrhizal development. Plant Soil 71, 275–284 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182663

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182663

Key words

Navigation