Skip to main content
Log in

Tests of three hypotheses regarding the predictors of delinquency

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three hypotheses regarding the predictors of criminal activity in children and adolescents were assessed. These dealt with family, peer, and attitudinal variables, and they were explored in relation to indices based on seriousness of criminal activity and reoffending. The data were based on a sample of 338 youths who had been convicted of crimes and received probation or custody dispositions. The results provided general support for a model implicating family, peer, and attitudinal variables in youthful criminal activity. They did not, however, provide support for hypothesized interactions between family relationship and family structuring dimensions or between family relationship and peer association variables. The results did support an hypothesis regarding the independent contribution of an antisocial attitudes variable to the prediction of criminal activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1994).The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Hoge, R. D., & Leschied, A. W. (1992).A review of the profile, classification, and treatment literature with young offenders: A social-psychological approach. Toronto, Ontario: Ministry of Community and Social Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Robinson, D., & Balla, M. (1986). Risk principle of case classification and the prevention of residential placements: An outcome evaluation of the Share the Parenting Program.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Robinson, D., & Hoge, R. D. (1984).The Youth Level of Service Inventory: Manual and scoring guide. Ottawa, Ontario: A report of the Laboratory for Research and Evaluation in the Human Services, Carleton University.

  • Blaske, D. M., Borduin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., & Mann, B. J. (1989). Individual, family, and peer characteristics of adolescent sex offenders and assaultive offenders.Developmental Psychology, 25, 846–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, R. (1982). Sex differences in self-report delinquency.Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 373–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D. & Ageton, S. S. (1985).Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. T. (1950).Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, N. G. (1989). Consequential thinking and self-reported delinquency in high-school youth.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 16, 440–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, C. L., Henggeler, S. W., Haefele, & Rodick, J. D. (1984)). Demographic, individual, and family relationship correlates of serious and repeated crime among adolescents and their siblings.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 528–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W. (1989).Delinquency in adolescence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W. (1991). Multidimensional causal models of delinquent behavior and their implications for treatment. In R. Cohen & A. W. Siegel (Eds.),Context and development (pp. 211–231). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W., Edwards, J., & Borduin, C. M. (1987). The family relations of female juvenile delinquents.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W., Rodick, J. D., Borduin, C. M., Hanson, C. L., Watson, S. M., & Urey, J. M. (1986). Multisystemic treatment of juvenile offenders: Effects on adolescent behavior and family interaction.Developmental Psychology, 22, 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of delinquency. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1987).Conduct disorders in childhood and adolescence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1993). Adolescent mental health: Prevention and treatment programs.American Psychologist, 48, 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, B., Ouimet, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (1988). An integrative control theory of delinquent behavior: A validation of 1976–1985.Psychiatry, 51, 164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Dishion, T. J. (1983). Early predictors of male delinquency: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 94, 68–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1987). Prediction. In H. C. Quay (Ed.),Handbook of juvenile delinquency (pp. 325–382). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C. R. (1984).Female crime and delinquency. Birmingham: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, J. (1983). The serious juvenile offender: Problems in definition and targeting. In J. R. Klugel (Ed.),Evaluating juvenile justice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R. (1982).Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B. D., & Ramsay, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on anti-social behavior.American Psychologist, 44, 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1984). The correlation of family management practices and delinquency.Child Development, 55, 1299–1307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, J. H., & Wells, L. E. (1990). The effect of parental attachments and direct controls on delinquency.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 140–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma-Street, M. (1991). A review of female delinquency. In A. W. Lescheid, P. G. Jaffe, & W. Willis (Eds.),The Young Offenders Act: A revolution in Canadian justice (pp. 248–287). Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, J. D., & Wirt, R. D. (1984). Childhood aggression and social adjustment as antecedents of delinquency.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, I. W., & Simourd, D. J. (1991). Predicting predatory behavior in a population of incarcerated young offenders.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 180–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simourd, D. J., Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (June, 1991).Risk/needs assessments of Phase-I young offenders. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the Canadian Psychological Association, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

  • Simourd, L., Andrews, D. A., & Hoge, R. D. (1993, May).Correlates of delinquency: A meta-analytic review of gender differences and similarities. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Psychological Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

  • Snyder, J., & Patterson, G. R. (1987). Family interaction and delinquent behavior. In H. C. Quay (Ed.),Handbook of juvenile delinquency (pp. 216–243). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolan, P. H. (1988). Socioeconomic, family, and social stress correlates of adolescent antisocial and delinquent behavior.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 317–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, R. E., Masse, B., Perron, D., LeBlanc, M., Schwartzman, A. E., & Ledingham, J. E. (1992). Early disruptive behavior, poor school achievement, delinquent behavior, and delinquent personality: Longitudinal analyses.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Voorhis, P., Cullen, F. T., Mathers, R. A., & Garner, C. C. (1988). The impact of family structure and quality on delinquency: A comparative assessment of structural and functional factors.Criminology, 26, 235–261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Funding to support this research was provided by the Children's Services Branch of the Ministry of Community and Social Services (Ontario), Carleton University, and the London Family Court Clinic. Thanks are extended to Penny Faulkner, Mary Ann Robblee, Suzanne Bell, and Natalie Gabora for their assistance on the project. Members of the Ministry Research Advisory Committee are also thanked for their contribution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoge, R.D., Andrews, D.A. & Leschied, A.W. Tests of three hypotheses regarding the predictors of delinquency. J Abnorm Child Psychol 22, 547–559 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02168937

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02168937

Keywords

Navigation