Summary
A method for the determination of exchangeable lithium using 0.5M NH4Cl is described. The range of exchangeable Li in the fifty Papua New Guinea (PNG) soils analyzed was 0.002 to 0.409 μgg−1 in contrast to five Australian soils which ranged from 0.032 to 0.830 μgg−1. The PNG soils were divided into hill and alluvial soils with average exchangeable Li contents of 0.062 and 0.263 μgg−1 respectively. No significant correlation between total and exchangeable Li was found in either group of soils althoughr=0.67 for the comined data and was significant at the 5% level. From the analysis of three profiles exchangeable Li was found to be at least twice as high (0.27 μgg−1) in surface soils as in subsurface samples (0.10 μgg−1). The average value of the deeper subsoil samples was 0.18 ppm.
R mode cluster analysis of the data for village garden soils collected on a sampling grid showed that exchangeable Li was more strongly assoicated with Ca and Mg than with pH, 0.05M EDTA soluble Zn, 0.5M NaHCO3 soluble P or exchangeable Na and K. Computer constructed isographs using the analyses of grid samples from a garden illustrated the association between Li, Ca and Mg and the inverse association with Na.
The correlation coefficient between Ca and Li in the ash of three food plants (Gnetum gnemon, Hibiscus abelmoschus andStenochlaena plustris) while not significant on an individual basis, was significant when the data was combined suggesting that the association between these elements in the soil may reflect an association in the ash returned to the soil when the garden was cleared. The correlation coefficient between soil exchangeable Li and Li in plant ash was positive, but not significant.
Adsorption experiments over a five-day period demonstrated that Li was strongly adsorbed from solution. On average 63–75% of the adsorbed Li was fixed in a form which was not exchangeable with 0.5M NH4Cl or soluble in 0.05M EDTA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schamschula, R. G., Adkins, B. L., Barmes, D. E., Charlton, G. and Davey, B. G. 1978 WHO study of dental caries etiology in Papua New Guinea. WHO Offset Publication40, Geneva.
Johnson, K. R. and Albani, A. D. 1973 Biotopes of recent benthonic foraminifera in Pitt Water Broken Bay, N.S.W. (Australia). Palaeogeogr. Palaoclimatol. Palaeoecol.14, 265–276.
Swaine, D. J. 1955 The trace element content of soils. Tech. Comm.48 Common. Bur. Soil Sci., Harpenden U.K.
Schaklette, H. T., Boerngen, J. G., Cahill, J. P. and Rahill, R. H. 1973 Lithium in surficial materials of the conterminous United States and partial data on cadmium. U.S. Dept. Interior Geol. Survey, Circ.673.
Bradford, G. J. 1966 LithiumIn Diagnostic criteria for Plants and Soils. Ed. H. T. Chapman. Univ. Dev. Agric. Sci., Riverside, Calif. 793 p.
Norrish, K. 1954 The swelling of montmorillonite. Discuss. Faraday Soc.18, 120–124.
Norrish, K. and Rausell-Colom, J. A. 1962 Low-angle X-ray diffraction studies of the swelling of montomorillonite and vermiculite. Tenth National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals. 123–149.
Gast, R. G. 1977 Surface and colloid chemistry.In Minerals in Soil Environments. Eds. J. B. Dixon and S. B. Weed. Soil Sci. Soc. Am, Madison, Wisconsin. 948 p.
Shainberg, I. and Kemper, W. D. 1966 Hydration status of adsorbed cations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.30, 707–713.
Shainberg, I. and Kemper, W. D. 1966 Electrostatic forces between clay and cations as calculated and inferred from electrical conductivity: Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 14th Nat. Conf., Berkeley, Calif. New York, 117–132.
Schachtschabel, P. 1940 Untersuchungen über die Sorption der Tonmineralien und organischen Bodenkolloide und die Bestimmung des Anteils dieser Kolloide an der Sorption in Boden. Kolloid Beihefte51, 199–276. Quoted by R. E. Grim, Clay Mineralogy, McGraw Hill, p 145 (1953).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davey, B.G., Wheeler, R.C. Some aspects of the chemistry of lithium in soils. Plant Soil 57, 49–60 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139641
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139641