Skip to main content
Log in

Network planning with random demand

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study a planning problem associated with networks for private line services. In these networks, demands are known to exhibit considerable variability, and as such, they should be treated as random variables. The proposed planning model is a two-stage stochastic linear program (SLP) with recourse. Due to the enormous size of the deterministic equivalent, we choose a sampling based algorithm calledstochastic decomposition (SD). For very large-scale SLPs, such as the ones solved in this application, SD provides an effective methodology. The model presented in this paper is validated by using a detailed simulation of the network. We report results with a network that has 86 demand pairs, 89 links and 706 potential routes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.R. Ash, R.H. Cardwell and R.P. Murray, Design and optimization of networks with dynamic routing, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 60(1981)1787–1820.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.F. Benders, Partitioning procedures for solving mixed variables programming problems, Numerische Mathematik 4(1962)238–252.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W.H. Cameron, J. Regnier, P. Galloy and A.M. Savoi, Dynamic routing for intercity telephone networks,Proc. 10th Int. Teletraffic Congress, Montreal, 1983.

  4. G.B. Dantzig and P.W. Glynn, Parallel processors for planning under uncertainty, Ann. Oper. Res. 22(1990)1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.D. Doverspike and V. Jha, Comparison of routing methods for DCS-switched networks, Interfaces, Special Issue on Telecommunications, 23(1993)21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.D. Eppen, R.K. Martin and L. Schrage, A scenario approach to capacity planning, Oper. Res. 37(1989)517–527.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Ernoliev, Stochastic quasigradient methods, in:Numerical Techniques for Stochastic Optimization, eds. Y. Ermoliev and R.J-B. Wets (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Gaivoronski, Implementation of stochastic quasigradient methods, in:Numerical Techniques for Stochastic Optimization, eds. Y. Ermoliev and R.J-B. Wets (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.L. Higle and S. Sen, Stochastic decomposition: An algorithm for stage linear programs with recourse, Math. Oper. Res. 16(1991)650–669.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.L. Higle and S. Sen, Statistical verification of optimality conditions, Ann. Oper. Res. 30(1991) 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.S. Horn, Modeling the error distribution for special-services forecasts, Bell Laboratories Technical Memorandum 83-54113-3 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Infanger, Monte Carlo (importance) sampling within a Benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic linear programs, Ann. Oper. Res. 39(1992)69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Ionescu-Graff, A sequential projection algorithm for special services demand, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 61(1982)34–66.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K.C. Kiwiel,Methods of Descent for Nondifferentiable Optimization, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1133 (Springer, Berlin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K.R. Krishnan and T.J. Ott, State-dependent routing for telephone traffic: Theory and results,25th IEEE Control and Decision Conf., Athens, Greece, 1986.

  16. K.R. Krishnan and T.J. Ott, Forward looking routing: A new state dependent routing scheme,Proc. 12th Int. Teletraffic Congress, Torino, Italy, 1988.

  17. F.H. Murphy, S. Sen and A.L. Soyster, Electric utility capacity expansion with uncertain load forecasts, HE Trans. 14(1982)52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K.G. Murty,Linear Programming (Wiley, 1984).

  19. S. Sen, J. Mai and J.L. Higle, Solution of large scale stochastic programs with stochastic decomposition algorithms, in:Large Scale Optimization: The State of the Art, eds. W. Hager, D. Hearn and P. Pardalos (Kluwer, 1993), to be published.

  20. D.R. Smith, A model for special-service circuit activity, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 62(1983)2911–2934.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Uriasiev, Adaptive stochastic quasigradient methods, in:Numerical Techniques for Stochastic Optimization, eds. Y. Ermoliev and R.J-B. Wets (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Van Slyke and R.J-B. Wets, L-shapes linear programs with application to optimal control and stochastic programming, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 17(1969)638–663.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.J-B. Wets, Stochastic programming: Solution techniques and approximation schemes, in:Mathematical Programming: The State of the Art, 1982, eds. A. Bachem, M. Groetschel and B. Korte (Springer, Berlin, 1982) pp. 566–603.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported in part by Grant No. NSF-DDM-9114352 from the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sen, S., Doverspike, R.D. & Cosares, S. Network planning with random demand. Telecommunication Systems 3, 11–30 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110042

Keywords

Navigation