Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

On the basis of the well-known quantum logic and quantum probability a formal language of relativistic quantum physics is developed. This language incorporates quantum logical as well as relativistic restrictions. It is shown that relativity imposes serious restrictions on the validity regions of propositions in space-time. By an additional postulate this relativistic quantum logic can be made consistent. The results of this paper are derived exclusively within the formal quantum language; they are, however, in accordance with well-known facts of relativistic quantum physics in Hilbert space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birkhoff, G., and von Neumann, J. (1936). “The Logic of Quantum Mechanics,”Annals of Mathematics,37, 823.

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Espagnat, B. (1979). “Quantum Theory and Reality,”Scientific American,Nov. p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixmier, J. (1957).Les Algèbres d'Operateur dans L'Espace, Hilbertien, Paris, Gautheir-Villars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, D. (1969). “Matter, Space and Logic,” in R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wortofsky (Eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. V. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulis, D. J. (1960). “Baer*-Semigroups”,Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society,11, 648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudder, S. P. (1971). “Representations of Groups as Automorphism of Orthomodular Lattices and Posets,”Canadian Journal of Mathematics,23, 659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch, J. M. (1968).Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading. Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch, J. M. (1974). “Quantum Probability Calculus,”Synthese,29, 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppe, H., and Zapp, H. C. (1983). To be published.

  • Levi-Leblond, J. M. (1976).American Journal of Physics,44, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüders, G. (1951). “Über die Zustandsänderungen durch den Messprozess”,Annalen der Physik,8, 322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P. (1976a). “On the Applicability of the Probability Concept in Quantum Mechanics,” in: Harper and Hooker (Eds.),Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, Vol. III, p. 155. D. Reidel, Dordrecht: Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P. (1976b).Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics, Chap. III. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P. (1976/80).Der Zeitbegriff in der Physik, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P. (1978).Quantum Logic. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P., and Stachow, E. W. (1978). The Principle of Excluded Middle in Quantum Logic,”Journal of Philosophical Logic,7, 181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, W. (1981). “Some Comments on the Concept of State in Quantum Mechanics,” inSymposium on Logic, Probability and Measurement in Quantum Mechanics, Erkenntnis,16. D. Reidel, Dordrecht: Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfarr, J. (1983). “An Operational Approach to the Lorentz-Transformation,”International Journal of Theoretical Physics (to be published).

  • Piron, C. (1976).Foundations of Quantum Physics. W. A. Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlieder, S. (1968). “Einige Bemerkungen zur Zustandsänderung...,”Communications in Mathematical Physics,7, 305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlieder, S. (1971). “Zum kausalen Verhalten eines relativistischen quantenmechanischen Systems,” in P. Dürr (Ed.)Quanten und Felder, Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachow, E. W. (1978a). “Quantum Logical Calculi and Lattice Structures,”Journal of Philosophical Logic,7, 347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachow, E. W. (1978b). “An Operational Approach to Quantum Probabilities,” in C. A. Hooker, (Ed.)Physical Theory as Logico-Operational Structure, p. 285. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachow, E. W. (1979). “Operational Quantum Probabilities,” Abstracts of the 6th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 1979, Bönecke Druck, Clausthal, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachow, E. W. (1980). “A Model Theoretic Semantics for Quantum Logic,” in P. D. Asquith and R. N. Giere (Eds.),Proceedings of the PSA 1980, East Lansing, Michigan, 1980, p. 272.

  • Stachow, E. W. (1981a). “Logical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics,”International Journal of Theoretical Physics,19, 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachow, E. W. (1981b). “Der quantenmechanische Wahrscheinlichkeitskalkül,” in J. Nitsch. J. Pfarr, and E. W. Stachow (Eds.),Grundlagenprobleme der modernen Physik, p. 271. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streater, R. F., and Wightman, A. W. (1964).PCT, Spin and Statistics and All That, W. A. Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigier, J.-P. (1981). Private Communication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mittelstaedt, P. Relativistic quantum logic. Int J Theor Phys 22, 293–314 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082895

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082895

Keywords

Navigation