Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate-term functional results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is gaining worldwide popularity as an alternative for the transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) method for the local excision of rectal polyps and selected neoplasms. Data on patient reported outcomes regarding short-term follow-up are scarce; data on functional outcomes for long-term follow-up is non-existent.

Methods

We used the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI) to prospectively assess the fecal continence on the intermediate-term follow-up after TAMIS. The primary outcome measure is postoperative fecal continence. Secondary outcome measures are as follows: perioperative and intermediate-term morbidity.

Results

Forty-two patients (m = 21:f = 21), median age 68.5 (range 34–94) years, were included in the analysis. In four patients (9.5%), postoperative complications occurred. The median follow-up was 36 months (range 24–48). Preoperative mean FISI score was 8.3 points. One year after TAMIS, mean FISI score was 5.4 points (p = 0.501). After 3 years of follow-up, mean FISI score was 10.1 points (p = 0.01). Fecal continence improved in 11 patients (26%). Continence decreased in 20 patients (47.6%) (mean FISI score 15.2 points, [range 3–31]).

Conclusions

This study found that the incidence of impaired fecal continence after TAMIS is substantial; however, the clinical significance of this deterioration seems minor. The present data is helpful in acquiring informed consent and emphasizes the need of proper patient information.

Functional results seem to be comparable to results after TEMS. Furthermore, we confirmed TAMIS is safe and associated with low morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks AG, Stuart AE (1973) The management of villous tumours of the large bowel. Br J Surg 60(9):688–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Francillon J, Moulay A, Vignal J, Tissot E (1974) Excision of carcinomas of the rectal ampulla via the inferior route. The parachute technic. Nouv Press Med 3(21):1365–1366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J, Bobel M, Isselhard W, Pichlmaier H (1984) A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 55(10):677–680

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum 51(7):1026–1030; discussion 1030-1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9337-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Graaf EJ, Burger JW, van Ijsseldijk AL, Tetteroo GW, Dawson I, Hop WC (2011) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas. Color Dis : Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 13(7):762–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02269.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barendse RM, Dijkgraaf MG, Rolf UR, Bijnen AB, Consten EC, Hoff C, Dekker E, Fockens P, Bemelman WA, de Graaf EJ (2013) Colorectal surgeons’ learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 27(10):3591–3602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2931-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maslekar S, Pillinger SH, Sharma A, Taylor A, Monson JR (2007) Cost analysis of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumours. Color Dis 9(3):229–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01132.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dafnis G, Pahlman L, Raab Y, Gustafsson UM, Graf W (2004) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: clinical and functional results. Color Dis : Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 6(5):336–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00629.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Herman RM, Richter P, Walega P, Popiela T (2001) Anorectal sphincter function and rectal barostat study in patients following transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Int J Color Dis 16(6):370–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Doornebosch PG, Gosselink MP, Neijenhuis PA, Schouten WR, Tollenaar RA, de Graaf EJ (2008) Impact of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on functional outcome and quality of life. Int J Color Dis 23(7):709–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-008-0442-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Planting A, Phang PT, Raval MJ, Brown CJ (2013) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: impact on fecal incontinence and quality of life. Can J Surg 56(4):243–248. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.028411

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Allaix ME, Rebecchi F, Giaccone C, Mistrangelo M, Morino M (2011) Long-term functional results and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg 98(11):1635–1643. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, Izfar S, Larach SW (2013) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 56(3):301–307. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827ca313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24(9):2200–2205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0927-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barendse RM, Doornebosch PG, Bemelman WA, Fockens P, Dekker E, de Graaf EJ (2012) Transanal employment of single access ports is feasible for rectal surgery. Ann Surg 256(6):1030–1033. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182523b31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alessandro C, Daniela M, Michele M, Andrea T, Gianmarco G, Massimo S, Orazio Z, Fabio G, Giuseppe T (2012) Glove port technique for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Int J Surg Oncol 2012:383025. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/383025

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hompes R, Ris F, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ, Cahill RA (2012) Transanal glove port is a safe and cost-effective alternative for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg 99(10):1429–1435. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee TG, Lee SJ (2013) Transanal single-port microsurgery for rectal tumors: minimal invasive surgery under spinal anesthesia. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3184-0

  19. Schiphorst AH, Langenhoff BS, Maring J, Pronk A, Zimmerman DD (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: initial experience and short-term functional results. Dis Colon Rectum 57(8):927–932. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Verseveld M, de Graaf EJ, Verhoef C, van Meerten E, Punt CJ, de Hingh IH, Nagtegaal ID, Nuyttens JJ, Marijnen CA, de Wilt JH, Group CS (2015) Chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer in the distal rectum followed by organ-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (CARTS study). Br J Surg 102(7):853–860. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42(12):1525–1532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Buess G, Kipfmuller K, Hack D, Grussner R, Heintz A, Junginger T (1988) Technique of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 2(2):71–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kennedy ML, Lubowski DZ, King DW (2002) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision: is anorectal function compromised? Dis Colon Rectum 45(5):601–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barendse RM, Oors JM, de Graaf EJ, Bemelman WA, Fockens P, Dekker E, Smout AJ (2013) The effect of endoscopic mucosal resection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery on anorectal function. Color Dis : Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 15(9):e534–e541. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. de Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, Tetteroo GW, Geldof H, Hop WC (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is feasible for adenomas throughout the entire rectum: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 52(6):1107–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a0d06d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Restivo A, Zorcolo L, D'Alia G, Cocco F, Cossu A, Scintu F, Casula G (2016) Risk of complications and long-term functional alterations after local excision of rectal tumors with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Int J Color Dis 31(2):257–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2371-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marin-Gabriel JC, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Diaz-Tasende J, Herreros de Tejada A (2016) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection from a Western perspective: today’s promises and future challenges. World J Gastrointest Endosc 8(2):40–55. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i2.40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Frenckner B, Euler CV (1975) Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut 16(6):482–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rao SS (2004) Pathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126(1 Suppl 1):S14–S22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gibbons CP, Bannister JJ, Trowbridge EA, Read NW (1986) An analysis of anal sphincter pressure and anal compliance in normal subjects. Int J Color Dis 1(4):231–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gibbons CP, Trowbridge EA, Bannister JJ, Read NW (1986) Role of anal cushions in maintaining continence. Lancet 1(8486):886–888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. van Tets WF, Kuijpers JH, Tran K, Mollen R, van Goor H (1997) Influence of Parks’ anal retractor on anal sphincter pressures. Dis Colon Rectum 40(9):1042–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zimmerman DD, Gosselink MP, Hop WC, Darby M, Briel JW, Schouten WR (2003) Impact of two different types of anal retractor on fecal continence after fistula repair: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 46(12):1674–1679. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DCR.0000098911.72691.27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gundling F, Seidl H, Scalercio N, Schmidt T, Schepp W, Pehl C (2010) Influence of gender and age on anorectal function: normal values from anorectal manometry in a large caucasian population. Digestion 81(4):207–213. https://doi.org/10.1159/000258662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Loening-Baucke V, Anuras S (1985) Effects of age and sex on anorectal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 80(1):50–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rao SS, Hatfield R, Soffer E, Rao S, Beaty J, Conklin JL (1999) Manometric tests of anorectal function in healthy adults. Am J Gastroenterol 94(3):773–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00950.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Huebner M, Margulies RU, Fenner DE, Ashton-Miller JA, Bitar KN, DeLancey JO (2007) Age effects on internal anal sphincter thickness and diameter in nulliparous females. Dis Colon Rectum 50(9):1405–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0877-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lewicky-Gaupp C, Hamilton Q, Ashton-Miller J, Huebner M, DeLancey JO, Fenner DE (2009) Anal sphincter structure and function relationships in aging and fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(5):559):e551–e555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ziv Y, Zbar A, Bar-Shavit Y, Igov I (2013) Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations. Tech Coloproctol 17(2):151–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0909-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S, Rectal Cancer Function Study G (2013) Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 100(10):1377–1387. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Doornebosch PG, Tollenaar RA, Gosselink MP, Stassen LP, Dijkhuis CM, Schouten WR, van de Velde CJ, de Graaf EJ (2007) Quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and total mesorectal excision in early rectal cancer. Color Dis 9(6):553–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01186.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. De Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, Tollenaar RA, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, de Boer AC, Bekkering FC, van de Velde CJ (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus total mesorectal excision of T1 rectal adenocarcinomas with curative intention. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(12):1280–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2009.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cavanaugh M, Hyman N, Osler T (2002) Fecal incontinence severity index after fistulotomy: a predictor of quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 45(3):349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank M. De Jong MD, PhD for her comments that improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands

    S. H. E. M. Clermonts, Y. T. van Loon, A. H. W. Schiphorst, D. K. Wasowicz & D. D. E. Zimmerman

Authors
  1. S. H. E. M. Clermonts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. T. van Loon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. H. W. Schiphorst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. K. Wasowicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. D. E. Zimmerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. H. E. M. Clermonts.

Ethics declarations

A written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.

The present report was prepared in concordance with STROBE guidelines (http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/strobe/).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clermonts, S.H.E.M., van Loon, Y.T., Schiphorst, A.H.W. et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate-term functional results. Int J Colorectal Dis 32, 1677–1685 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2893-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2893-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation