Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of the total motile sperm count on the success of intrauterine insemination with husband's spermatozoa

  • Andrology
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the total motile sperm count and the success of IUI treatment cycles with postwashed husband spermatozoa in couples with infertility in a large patient population.

Patients: When 939 couples underwent 1375 cycles of IUI with varying etiologies of infertility which included male factor, endometriosis, tubal factor, ovulatory dysfunction, uterine factor, cervical factor, and unexplained infertility, the results were 207 pregnancies.

Results: The overall pregnancy rate per cycle was 15.1% (207/1375). The total motile sperm count were significantly increased in the pregnant group than the nonpregnant group (38.7×106 versus 28.6 × 106;P<0.001). There was a trend toward an increased success rate with increased total motile sperm count. Significance was reached when the total motile sperm count exceeded 5×106. Life table analysis was performed and the curve representing a cumulative chance of pregnancy calculated from our data reached 72%.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a final postwashed total motile sperm count used for IUI may be considered predictive of the success for pregnancy and allow couples to be informed of the chances of success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tarlatzis BC, Bontis J, Kolibianakis EM, Sanopoulou T, Papadimas J, Lagos S, Mantalenakis S: Evaluation of intrauterine insemination with washed spermatozoa from the husband in the treatment of infertility. Hum Reprod 1991;6:1241–1246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Makler A, DeCherney A, Naftolin F: A device for injecting and retaining a small volume of concentrated spermatozoa in the uterine cavity and cervical canal. Fertil Steril 1984;42:306–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen NC, Herbst CM, Maxson WS, Roger BJ, Diamond MP, Wentz AC: Intrauterine insemination: A critical review. Fertil Steril 1985;44:569–580

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McGovern P, Quagliarello J, Arny M: Relationship of within-patient semen variability to outcome of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1989;51:1019–1023

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kerin JFP, Kirby C, Peek J, Jeffrey R, Warnes GM, Matthews CD, Cox LW: Improved conception rate after intrauterine insemination of washed spermatozoa from men with poor quality semen. Lancet 1984;1:533

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Francavilla F, Romano R, Santucci R, Poccia G: Effect of sperm morphology and motile sperm count on outcome of intrauterine insemination in oligozoospermia and/or asthenozoospermia. Fertil Steril 1990;53:892–897

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moghissi KS: Some reflections on intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1986;466:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hewitt J, Cohen J, Krishnaswamy V, Fehilly CB, Steptoe PC, Walters DE: Treatment of idiopathic infertility, cervical mucus hostility, and male infertility: Artificial insemination with husband's semen or in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril 1985;44:350–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davajan V, Vargyas JM, Kletzky OA, March CM, Bernstein GS, Mishell DR Jr, Marrs RP: Intrauterine insemination with washed sperm to treat infertility. Fertil Steril 1983;40:419

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doson WC, Haney AF: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 1991;55:457–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirby CA, Flaherty SP, Godfrey BM, Warnes GM, Matthews CD: A prospective trial of intrauterine insemination of motile spermatozoa versus timed intercourse. Fertil Steril 1991;56:102–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Velde ER, van Kooy RJ, Waterreus JJH: Intrauterine insemination of washed husband's spermatozoa: A controlled study. Fertil Steril 1989;51:182–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berger T, Marrs RP, Moyer DL: Comparison of techniques for selection of motile spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1985;43:268–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cruz RI, Kemmann E, Brandeis VT, Becker KA, Beck M, Beardsley M: A prospective study of intrauterine insemination of processed sperm from men with oligoasthenospermia in superovulated women. Fertil Steril 1986;46:673–677

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ho PC, So WK, Chan YF, Yeung WSB: Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation as a treatment for subfertility because of subnormal semen: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 1992;58:995–999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DiMarzo SJ, Kennedy JF, Young PE, Herbert SA, Rosenberg DC, Villanueva B: Effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on pregnancy rates intrauterine insemination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1607–1613

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cramer DW, Walker AM, Schiff I: Statistical methods in evaluating the outcome of infertility therapy. Fertil Steril 1979;32:80–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alexander NJ, Ackerman S: Therapeutic insemination. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1987;14:905–929

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mortimer D, Templeton AA: Sperm transport in the human female reproductive tract in relation to semen analysis characteristics and time of ovulation. J Reprod Fertil 1982;64:401–408

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoing LM, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC: Treatment of infertility because of oligoasthenoteratospermia by transcervical intrauterine insemination of motile spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1986;45:388–391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aitken RJ, Best FSM, Richardson DW, Djahanbakhch O, Templeton A, Les MM: An analysis of semen quality and sperm function in cases of oligozoospermia. Fertil Steril 1982;38:705–711

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Silber SJ: The relationship of abnormal semen parameters to male infertility. Hum Reprod 1989;4:747–753

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez AR, Bernardus RE, Voorhorst FJ, Vermeiden JPW, Schoemaker J: Intrauterine insemination does and clomiphene citrate does not improve fecundity in couples with infertility due to male or idiopathic factors: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril 1990;53:847–853

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chaffkin LM, Nulsen JC, Luciano AA, Metzger DA: A comparative analysis of the cycle fecundity rates associated with combined human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus either hMG or IUI alone. Fertil Steril 1991;55:252–257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brasch JG, Rawlins R, Tarchala S, Radwanska E: The relationship between total motile sperm count and the success of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1994;62:150–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, Curole DN, Rye PH, Matulich EM: Follicle number, serum estradiol, and other factors to birth rate and multiparity in human menopausal gonadotropin-induced intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 1991;56:89–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lalich RA, Marut EL, Prins GS, Scommegna A: Life table analysis of intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:980–984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, HY., Lee, CL., Lai, YM. et al. The impact of the total motile sperm count on the success of intrauterine insemination with husband's spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet 13, 56–63 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02068871

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02068871

Key words

Navigation