Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced offspring production in bark beetleTomicus piniperda in pine bolts baited with ethanol and α-pinene, which attract antagonistic insects

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bolts of Scots pine,Pinus sylvestris L., attacked by the bark beetleTomicus piniperda (L.) were baited with ethanol and α-pinene to attract antagonistic insects and thereby enhance their detrimental effects on the production of bark beetle progeny. Unbaited and caged bolts were included in the experiments as controls. Attraction of beetles to the bolts and subsequent emergence were estimated using traps. Six phloem-feeding species (potential competitors ofT. piniperda) and four predatory species were caught in significantly higher numbers at the baited bolts than at the unbaited ones. The number of offspring and the productivity ofT. piniperda were four to seven times higher in unbaited bolts than in baited bolts. Exclusion of other insects, by using cages, resulted in a nine-fold increase in the number ofT. piniperda offspring per square meter and productivity (offspring per egg gallery) compared with unbaited, exposed bolts.Hylurgops palliatus (Gyll.) (Scolytidae) andRhagium inquisitor (L.) (Cerambycidae) attacked both the baited and unbaited bolts, whereasAcanthocinus aedilis (L.) (Cerambycidae) andPytho depressus (L.) (Pythidae) reproduced almost exclusively in the baited ones. Large numbers of larvae ofThanasimus (Cleridae) andRhizophagus (Rhizophagidae) emerged from both the baited and unbaited bolts. Adults ofPlegaderus vulneratus (Panzer) andCylister linearis (Er.) (Histeridae) emerged almost exclusively from the baited bolts. The low progeny production ofT. piniperda in the baited bolts was attributed largely to the influence of adults ofRhizophagus andEpuraea (Nitidulidae), and larvae ofThanasimus andA. aedilis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, J., andNilssen, A.C. 1978. The food selection ofPytho depressus L. (Col., Pythidae).Norw. J. Entomol. 25:225–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakke, A., andKvamme, T. 1981. Kairomone response inThanasimus predators to pheromone components ofIps typographus.J. Chem. Ecol. 7:305–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, J.H. 1982. Aggregation pheromones, pp. 74–139,in J.B. Mitton and K.B. Sturgeon (eds.). Bark beetles in North American Conifers. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A., Lanne, B.S., Löfqvist, J., Schlyter, F., andBergström, G. 1985. Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles.Naturwissenschaften 72:324–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade, S.C., Hrutfiord, B.F., andGara, R.I. 1970. Identification of a primary attractant forGnathotrichus sulcatus isolated from western hemlock logs.J. Econ. Entomol. 63:1014–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J.A., andKinghorn, J.M. 1955. Window flight traps for insects.Can. Entomol. 87:46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatelain, M.P., andSchenk, J.A. 1984. Evaluation of frontalin and exo-brevicomin as kairomones to control mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in lodgepole pine.Environ. Entomol. 13:1666–1674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chénier, J.V.R., andPhilogène, B.J.R. 1989. Field responses of certain forest Coleoptera to conifer monoterpenes and ethanol.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1729–1746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidmann, H.H., andNuorteva, M. 1968. Der Einfluss der Siedlungsdichte und anderer Faktoren auf die Anzahl der Nachkommen vonBlastophagus piniperda L. (Col., Scolytidae).Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 34:135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidaszewski, A. 1974. An analysis of the occurrence and salubrity ofTomicus piniperda (L.) andT. minor (Hrtg.) in forest stands in the Wielkopolski National Park during the years 1969–1970.Pol. Pismo Entomol. 44:789–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, H.S. 1937. Notes on the ecology and control of pine beetles in Great Britain.Bull. Entomol. Res. 28:185–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, T., Enda, N., Yamane, A., Oda, K., andToyoda, T. 1980. Attractants for the Japanese pine sawyer,Monochamus alternatus Hope (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).Appl. Entomol. Zool. 15:358–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimetzek, D., Köhler, J., Vité, J.P., andKohnle, U. 1986. Dosage response to ethanol mediates host selection by “secondary” bark beetles.Naturwissenschaften 73:270–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohnle, U. 1985. Untersuchungen über die Pheromonsysteme sekundärer Borkenkäfer.(Col., Scolytidae). Inaugural dissertation, Forstwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität zu Freiburg i. Br.

  • Lanne, B.S., Schlyter, F., Byers, J.A., Löfqvist, J., Leufven, A., Bergström, G., Van Der Pers, J.N.C., Unelius, R., Baeckstöm, P., andNorin, T. 1987. Differences in attraction to semiochemicals present in sympatric pine shoot beetlesTomicus minor andT. piniperda.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1045–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindelöw, Å., Eidmann, H.H., andNordenhem, H. 1993. Response on the ground of bark beetle and weevil species colonizing conifer stumps and roots to terpenes and ethanol.J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1393–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linit, M.J., andStephen, F.M. 1983. Parasite and predator component of within-tree southern pine beetle (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) mortality.Can. Entomol. 115:679–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Långström, B. 1984. Windthrown Scots pines as brood material forTomicus piniperda andT. minor.Silva Fenn. 18:187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Långström, B., andHellqvist, C. 1990. Spatial distribution of crown damage and growth losses caused by recurrent attacks of pine shoot beetles in pine stands surrounding a pulp mill in southern Sweden.J. Appl. Entomol. 110:261–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M.C. 1986. Survival of within-treeIps calligraphus (Col.: Scolytidae): Effect of insect associates.Entomophaga 31:305–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeck, H.A. 1970. Ethanol as the primary attractant for the ambrosia beetleTrypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 102:985–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuorteva, M. 1956. Über den Fichtenstamm-Bastkäfer,Hylurgops palliatus Gyll., und seine Insektenfeinde.Acta Entomol. Fenn. 13:1–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuorteva, M. 1962. Über die Nützlichkeit der Zimmerbocklarven (Acanthocinus aedilis) im Walde. XI Internationaler Kongress für Entomologie, Wien 1960. 2:171–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuorteva, M. 1964. Über den Einfluss der Menge des Brutmaterials auf die Vermehrlichkeit und die natürlichen Feinde des Grossen Waldgärtners,Blastophagus piniperda L. (Col., Scolytidae).Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 30:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perttunen, V., Oksanen, H., andKangas, E. 1970. Aspects of the external and internal factors affecting the olfactory orientation ofBlastophagus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24:293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, L.J., andBorden, J.H. 1991. Competitive interactions between the mountain pine beetle and the pine engraver in lodgepole pine.Can. J. For. Res. 21:1029–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarenmaa, H. 1983. Modeling the spatial pattern and intraspecific competition inTomicus piniperda (Coleoptera, Scolytidae).Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 118:1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarenmaa, H. 1985. Within-tree population dynamics models for integrated management ofTomicus piniperda (Coleoptera, Scolytidae).Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 128:1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen, K. 1973. On the life cycle, especially on the reproduction biology ofBlastophagus piniperda L. (Col., Scolytidae).Acta For. Fenn. 127:1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvard, D. 1989. Capacités de multiplication deTomicus piniperda L. (Col., Scolytidae) 1. Effects de la densité d'attaque.J. Appl. Entomol. 108:164–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, L.M. 1988. Attraction of the bark beetleTomicus piniperda and some other bark- and wood-living beetles to the host volatiles α-pinene and ethanol.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 46:203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, L.M. 1993. Attraction ofEpuraea bickhardti St.-Claire Deville andE. boreella (Zetterstedt) (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae) to ethanol and α-pinene.Entomol. Fenn. 4:133–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, L.M., andEidmann, H.H. 1987. Gallery initiation byTomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on Scots pine trees baited with host volatiles.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1591–1599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, L.M., andLindelöw, Å. 1989. Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of α-pinene and ethanol.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:807–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjödin, K., Schroeder, L.M., Eidmann, H.H., Norin, T., andWold, S. 1989. Attack rates of scolytids and composition of volatile wood constituents in healthy and mechanically weakened pine trees.Scand. J. For. Res. 4:379–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömvall, A.-M., andPettersson, G. 1991. Conifer monoterpenes emitted to air by logging operations.Scand. J. For. Res. 6:253–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalenhorst, W. 1958. Grundzüge der Populationsdynamik des grossen FichtenborkenkäfersIps typographus L.Schriftenr. Forstl. Fak. Univ. Göttingen. 21:126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilles, D.A., Sjödin, K. Nordlander, G., andEidmann, H.H. 1986. Synergism between ethanol and conifer host volatiles as attractants for the pine weevil,Hylobius abietis (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 79:970–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vet, L.E.M., andDicke, M. 1992. Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37:141–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weslien, J. 1992. The arthropod complex associated withIps typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae): Species composition, phenology, and impact on bark beetle productivity.Entomol. Fenn. 3:205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weslien, J. 1994. Interactions within and between species at different densities of the bark beetleIps typographus (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) and its predator (Thanasimus formicarius (Coleoptera, Cleridae).Entomol. Exp. Appl. In press.

  • Weslien, J., andRegnander, J. 1992. The influence of natural enemies on brood production inIps typographus (Col. Scolytidae) with special reference to egg-laying and predation byThanasimus formicarius (Col.: Cleridae).Entomophaga 37:333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 718 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schroeder, L.M., Weslien, J. Reduced offspring production in bark beetleTomicus piniperda in pine bolts baited with ethanol and α-pinene, which attract antagonistic insects. J Chem Ecol 20, 1429–1444 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059871

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059871

Key Words

Navigation