Abstract
Bolts of Scots pine,Pinus sylvestris L., attacked by the bark beetleTomicus piniperda (L.) were baited with ethanol and α-pinene to attract antagonistic insects and thereby enhance their detrimental effects on the production of bark beetle progeny. Unbaited and caged bolts were included in the experiments as controls. Attraction of beetles to the bolts and subsequent emergence were estimated using traps. Six phloem-feeding species (potential competitors ofT. piniperda) and four predatory species were caught in significantly higher numbers at the baited bolts than at the unbaited ones. The number of offspring and the productivity ofT. piniperda were four to seven times higher in unbaited bolts than in baited bolts. Exclusion of other insects, by using cages, resulted in a nine-fold increase in the number ofT. piniperda offspring per square meter and productivity (offspring per egg gallery) compared with unbaited, exposed bolts.Hylurgops palliatus (Gyll.) (Scolytidae) andRhagium inquisitor (L.) (Cerambycidae) attacked both the baited and unbaited bolts, whereasAcanthocinus aedilis (L.) (Cerambycidae) andPytho depressus (L.) (Pythidae) reproduced almost exclusively in the baited ones. Large numbers of larvae ofThanasimus (Cleridae) andRhizophagus (Rhizophagidae) emerged from both the baited and unbaited bolts. Adults ofPlegaderus vulneratus (Panzer) andCylister linearis (Er.) (Histeridae) emerged almost exclusively from the baited bolts. The low progeny production ofT. piniperda in the baited bolts was attributed largely to the influence of adults ofRhizophagus andEpuraea (Nitidulidae), and larvae ofThanasimus andA. aedilis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, J., andNilssen, A.C. 1978. The food selection ofPytho depressus L. (Col., Pythidae).Norw. J. Entomol. 25:225–226.
Bakke, A., andKvamme, T. 1981. Kairomone response inThanasimus predators to pheromone components ofIps typographus.J. Chem. Ecol. 7:305–312.
Borden, J.H. 1982. Aggregation pheromones, pp. 74–139,in J.B. Mitton and K.B. Sturgeon (eds.). Bark beetles in North American Conifers. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.
Byers, J.A., Lanne, B.S., Löfqvist, J., Schlyter, F., andBergström, G. 1985. Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles.Naturwissenschaften 72:324–326.
Cade, S.C., Hrutfiord, B.F., andGara, R.I. 1970. Identification of a primary attractant forGnathotrichus sulcatus isolated from western hemlock logs.J. Econ. Entomol. 63:1014–1015.
Chapman, J.A., andKinghorn, J.M. 1955. Window flight traps for insects.Can. Entomol. 87:46–47.
Chatelain, M.P., andSchenk, J.A. 1984. Evaluation of frontalin and exo-brevicomin as kairomones to control mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in lodgepole pine.Environ. Entomol. 13:1666–1674.
Chénier, J.V.R., andPhilogène, B.J.R. 1989. Field responses of certain forest Coleoptera to conifer monoterpenes and ethanol.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1729–1746.
Eidmann, H.H., andNuorteva, M. 1968. Der Einfluss der Siedlungsdichte und anderer Faktoren auf die Anzahl der Nachkommen vonBlastophagus piniperda L. (Col., Scolytidae).Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 34:135–148.
Gidaszewski, A. 1974. An analysis of the occurrence and salubrity ofTomicus piniperda (L.) andT. minor (Hrtg.) in forest stands in the Wielkopolski National Park during the years 1969–1970.Pol. Pismo Entomol. 44:789–815.
Hanson, H.S. 1937. Notes on the ecology and control of pine beetles in Great Britain.Bull. Entomol. Res. 28:185–242.
Ikeda, T., Enda, N., Yamane, A., Oda, K., andToyoda, T. 1980. Attractants for the Japanese pine sawyer,Monochamus alternatus Hope (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).Appl. Entomol. Zool. 15:358–361.
Klimetzek, D., Köhler, J., Vité, J.P., andKohnle, U. 1986. Dosage response to ethanol mediates host selection by “secondary” bark beetles.Naturwissenschaften 73:270–272.
Kohnle, U. 1985. Untersuchungen über die Pheromonsysteme sekundärer Borkenkäfer.(Col., Scolytidae). Inaugural dissertation, Forstwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität zu Freiburg i. Br.
Lanne, B.S., Schlyter, F., Byers, J.A., Löfqvist, J., Leufven, A., Bergström, G., Van Der Pers, J.N.C., Unelius, R., Baeckstöm, P., andNorin, T. 1987. Differences in attraction to semiochemicals present in sympatric pine shoot beetlesTomicus minor andT. piniperda.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1045–1067.
Lindelöw, Å., Eidmann, H.H., andNordenhem, H. 1993. Response on the ground of bark beetle and weevil species colonizing conifer stumps and roots to terpenes and ethanol.J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1393–1403.
Linit, M.J., andStephen, F.M. 1983. Parasite and predator component of within-tree southern pine beetle (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) mortality.Can. Entomol. 115:679–688.
Långström, B. 1984. Windthrown Scots pines as brood material forTomicus piniperda andT. minor.Silva Fenn. 18:187–198.
Långström, B., andHellqvist, C. 1990. Spatial distribution of crown damage and growth losses caused by recurrent attacks of pine shoot beetles in pine stands surrounding a pulp mill in southern Sweden.J. Appl. Entomol. 110:261–269.
Miller, M.C. 1986. Survival of within-treeIps calligraphus (Col.: Scolytidae): Effect of insect associates.Entomophaga 31:305–328.
Moeck, H.A. 1970. Ethanol as the primary attractant for the ambrosia beetleTrypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 102:985–995.
Nuorteva, M. 1956. Über den Fichtenstamm-Bastkäfer,Hylurgops palliatus Gyll., und seine Insektenfeinde.Acta Entomol. Fenn. 13:1–118.
Nuorteva, M. 1962. Über die Nützlichkeit der Zimmerbocklarven (Acanthocinus aedilis) im Walde. XI Internationaler Kongress für Entomologie, Wien 1960. 2:171–173.
Nuorteva, M. 1964. Über den Einfluss der Menge des Brutmaterials auf die Vermehrlichkeit und die natürlichen Feinde des Grossen Waldgärtners,Blastophagus piniperda L. (Col., Scolytidae).Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 30:1–17.
Perttunen, V., Oksanen, H., andKangas, E. 1970. Aspects of the external and internal factors affecting the olfactory orientation ofBlastophagus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24:293–297.
Rankin, L.J., andBorden, J.H. 1991. Competitive interactions between the mountain pine beetle and the pine engraver in lodgepole pine.Can. J. For. Res. 21:1029–1036.
Saarenmaa, H. 1983. Modeling the spatial pattern and intraspecific competition inTomicus piniperda (Coleoptera, Scolytidae).Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 118:1–40.
Saarenmaa, H. 1985. Within-tree population dynamics models for integrated management ofTomicus piniperda (Coleoptera, Scolytidae).Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 128:1–56.
Salonen, K. 1973. On the life cycle, especially on the reproduction biology ofBlastophagus piniperda L. (Col., Scolytidae).Acta For. Fenn. 127:1–72.
Sauvard, D. 1989. Capacités de multiplication deTomicus piniperda L. (Col., Scolytidae) 1. Effects de la densité d'attaque.J. Appl. Entomol. 108:164–181.
Schroeder, L.M. 1988. Attraction of the bark beetleTomicus piniperda and some other bark- and wood-living beetles to the host volatiles α-pinene and ethanol.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 46:203–210.
Schroeder, L.M. 1993. Attraction ofEpuraea bickhardti St.-Claire Deville andE. boreella (Zetterstedt) (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae) to ethanol and α-pinene.Entomol. Fenn. 4:133–135.
Schroeder, L.M., andEidmann, H.H. 1987. Gallery initiation byTomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on Scots pine trees baited with host volatiles.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1591–1599.
Schroeder, L.M., andLindelöw, Å. 1989. Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of α-pinene and ethanol.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:807–817.
Sjödin, K., Schroeder, L.M., Eidmann, H.H., Norin, T., andWold, S. 1989. Attack rates of scolytids and composition of volatile wood constituents in healthy and mechanically weakened pine trees.Scand. J. For. Res. 4:379–391.
Strömvall, A.-M., andPettersson, G. 1991. Conifer monoterpenes emitted to air by logging operations.Scand. J. For. Res. 6:253–258.
Thalenhorst, W. 1958. Grundzüge der Populationsdynamik des grossen FichtenborkenkäfersIps typographus L.Schriftenr. Forstl. Fak. Univ. Göttingen. 21:126.
Tilles, D.A., Sjödin, K. Nordlander, G., andEidmann, H.H. 1986. Synergism between ethanol and conifer host volatiles as attractants for the pine weevil,Hylobius abietis (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 79:970–973.
Vet, L.E.M., andDicke, M. 1992. Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37:141–172.
Weslien, J. 1992. The arthropod complex associated withIps typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae): Species composition, phenology, and impact on bark beetle productivity.Entomol. Fenn. 3:205–213.
Weslien, J. 1994. Interactions within and between species at different densities of the bark beetleIps typographus (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) and its predator (Thanasimus formicarius (Coleoptera, Cleridae).Entomol. Exp. Appl. In press.
Weslien, J., andRegnander, J. 1992. The influence of natural enemies on brood production inIps typographus (Col. Scolytidae) with special reference to egg-laying and predation byThanasimus formicarius (Col.: Cleridae).Entomophaga 37:333–342.
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 718 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schroeder, L.M., Weslien, J. Reduced offspring production in bark beetleTomicus piniperda in pine bolts baited with ethanol and α-pinene, which attract antagonistic insects. J Chem Ecol 20, 1429–1444 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059871
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059871