Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine which factors influenced bowel function following total abdominal colectomy. METHODS: Thirty-two patients who had undergone total abdominal colectomy were studied with regard to factors that are classically thought to influence bowel function, namely, residual stump length, transit time, and rectal stump manometry. In a limited subset of patients, anal manometry was done also. RESULTS: Transit time was the best predictor of bowel function following total abdominal colectomy. This was followed by stump length. If transit time was short, then stump length became important in predicting the occurrence of diarrhea following total abdominal colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Two factors have an important influence on bowel function following total abdominal colectomy: transit time and rectal stump length. Rectal stump length is an anatomic factor that can be controlled by the surgeon. In total abdominal colectomy, rectal stump length of at least 20 cm is necessary if the patient is to have satisfactory postoperative bowel function. This may not always be possible. In these patients, modification of diet to influence transit time and methods to increase rectal compliance will be necessary.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lillehei RC, Wangensteen OH. Bowel function after colectomy for cancer, polyps, and diverticulitis. JAMA 1955;159:163–70.
Ottinger LW. Frequency of bowel movements after colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. Arch Surg 1978;113:1048–9.
Scott HW, Weaver FA, Fletcher JR, Sawyers JL, Adkins RB Jr. Is ileoproctostomy a reasonable procedure after total abdominal colectomy. Ann Surg 1986;203:583–9.
Walsh RM, Aranha GV, Freeark RJ. Mortality and quality of life after total abdominal colectomy. Arch Surg 1990;125:1564–6.
Fine KD, Krejs GJ, Fordtran JS. Diarrhea. In: Sleisenger MH, Fordtran JS, eds. Gastrointestinal disease, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1989:290–316.
Schiller LR. Fecal incontinence. In: Sleisenger MH, Fordtran JS, eds. Gastrointestinal disease, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1989:318–31.
Read NW, Harford WV, Schmulen AC, Read MG, Santa Ana C, Fortran JS. A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea. Gastroenterology 1979;76:747–56.
Leigh RJ, Turnberg LA. Fecal incontinence: the unvoiced symptom. Lancet 1982;1:1349–51.
Pemberton JH, Kelly KA. Achieving enteric continence: principles and applications. Mayo Clin Proc 1986;61:586–99.
Bubrick MP, Godec CJ, Cass AS. Functional evaluation of the rectal ampulla with ampullometrogram. J R Soc Med 1980;73:234–7.
Penninckx FM, Lestar B, Kerremans RP. A new balloon-retaining test for evaluation of anorectal function in incontinent patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:202–5.
Varma JS, Smith AN. Reproducibility of the proctometrogram. Gut 1986;27:288–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by a grant from the Department of Surgery, Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois.
About this article
Cite this article
Aranha, G.V., Walsh, R.M., Jacobs, H.K. et al. Factors influencing bowel function following total abdominal colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 1418–1422 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054532
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054532