Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective, randomized trial of inpatientvs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

A prospective, randomized trial of inpatientvs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery was performed in 100 consecutive patients. Bowel preparation was standardized for both groups and consisted of 4 liters of Colyte® (Reed & Carnrick, Piscataway, NJ) and oral neomycin and Flagyl® (G. D. Searle & Co., Skokie, IL) the day before surgery. Patients were randomized into four subcategories: ileocolostomy, colocolostomy, abdominal perineal resection, and other. Tap water enemas were administered on the morning of surgery to ensure an adequate mechanical preparation. Ninety-six percent of the inpatient group and 97 percent of the outpatient group were able to drink three-fourths or more of the oral lavage preparation (P=0.789, Fisher's exact text). A mean of 2.26 tap water enemas was required to achieve clear returns for the inpatient group, compared with 2.28 tap water enemas for the outpatient group (P=0.221, Fisher's exact test). The adequacy of the bowel preparation as graded by the primary surgeon was good (84 percent), fair (12 percent), and poor (4 percent) in the outpatient group (P=0.673, Fisher's exact test). Wound infection developed in 4 percent of the inpatient group and 4 percent of the outpatient group (P=1.0, Fisher's exact test). Anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess was seen in one patient in each group (P=1.0, Fisher's exact test). We conclude that outpatient bowel preparation is as effective as inpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery and offers the advantage of cost savings and shorter hospitalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartlett JG, Condon RE, Gorbach SL,et al. Veterans Administration cooperative study of bowel preparation for elective colorectal operations: impact of oral antibiotic regimen on colonic flora, wound irrigation, cultures and bacteriology of septic complications. Ann Surg 1978;188:249–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke JS, Condon RE, Bartlett JG,et al. Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce septic complications of colon operations: results of prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study. Ann Surg 1977;186:251–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hewitt J, Reeve J, Rigby J,et al. Whole-gut irrigation in preparation for large-bowel surgery. Lancet 1973;2:337–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crapp AR, Tillotson P, Powis SJ,et al. Preparation of the bowel by whole-gut irrigation. Lancet 1975;2:1239–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Skucas J, Cutcliff W, Fischer HW. Whole-gut irrigation as a means of cleaning the colon. Radiology 1976;121:303–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Washington JA II, Dearing WH, Judd ES,et al. Effect of preoperative antibiotic regimen on development of infection after intestinal surgery: prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Ann Surg 1974;180:567–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barber MS, Hirschberg BC, Rice CL,et al. Parenteral antibiotics in elective colon surgery? A prospective controlled clinical study. Surgery 1979;86:23–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Levy AG, Benson JW, Hewlett EL,et al. Saline lavage: a rapid, effective and acceptable method of cleansing the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology 1976;70:157–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilmore IT, Ellis WR, Barret GS,et al. A comparison of two methods of whole gut lavage for colonoscopy. Br J Surg 1981;68:388–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bond JH Jr, Levitt MD. Factors affecting the concentration of combustible gases in the colon during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1975;68:1145–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zanoni CE, Bergamini C, Bertoncini M, Bertoncini L, Garbini A. Whole-gut lavage for surgery: a case of intraoperative colon explosion after administration of mannitol. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:580–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis GR, Santa Ana CA, Morawski SG,et al. Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion. Gastroenterology 1980;78:991–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung RS, Gurll NJ, Berglund EM. A controlled clinical trial of whole gut lavage as a method of bowel preparation for colonic operations. Am J Surg 1979;137:75–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolff BG, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR,et al. A new bowel preparation for elective colon and rectal surgery. Arch Surg 1988;123:895–900.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hollender LF, Calderoli H, Philippides J,et al. Advantages of whole gut irrigation in colorectal surgery. Curr Surg 1980;37:227–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas G, Brozinsky S, Isenberg JI. Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced lavage solution (Golytely) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1982;82:435–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Meadows JO, Conyers CT. Golytely—preparation of choice for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1983;29:256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. DiPalma JA, Brady CE III, Pierson WP. Colon cleansing: acceptance by older patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1986;81:652–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. National Health Survey #100. Vital and Health Statistics. Department of Health and Human Services, publication 89-17761, 1989:184–95.

  20. American Medical News. American Medical Association, 1991:16.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Frazee, R.C., Roberts, J., Symmonds, R. et al. Prospective, randomized trial of inpatientvs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 35, 223–226 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051011

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051011

Key words

Navigation