Abstract
This study investigates whether measurements of anal sphincter pressure and length are reproducible and whether visual analyses of manometric tracings are reliable. Manometric studies were performed on three different days in 10 male and 10 female healthy subjects with the use of a pneumohydraulic capillary perfusion system. There was complete agreement between both observers in the analysis of anal resting and squeeze pressure as well as sphincter length. The pressure profiles from different days correlated significantly (P<0.01) with each other regardless of whether the studies were performed in the prepared or unprepared bowel. However, anal sphincter length and the quality of the anorectal inhibitory reflex varied greatly on different days. Male and female subjects showed major differences in the capacity of the anal sphincter to contract voluntarily (P<0.01), but resting tone and sphincter length were comparable in the two groups. It is concluded that pressure determinations in the anal canal are reliable and reproducible, but that alterations in the quality of the anorectal reflex need to be confirmed by repeated measurements before pathology is diagnosed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taylor BM, Beart RW, Philllips SF. Longitudinal and radial variations of pressure in the human anal sphincter. Gastroenterology 1984;86:693–7.
Bannister JJ, Abouzekri L, Read NW. Effect of aging on anorectal function. Gut 1987;28:353–7.
Krogh Pedersen I, Christiansen J. A study of the physiological variation in anal manometry. Br J Surg 1989;76:69–71.
Nivatvongs S, Stern HS, Fryd DS. The length of the anal canal. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:600–1.
McHugh SM, Diamant NE. Effect of age, gender, and parity on anal canal pressures: contribution of impaired anal sphincter function to fecal incontinence. Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:726–36.
Read NW, Harford WV, Schmulen AC, Read M, Santa Ana C, Fordtran JS. A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea. Gastroenterology 1979;76:747–56.
Whitehead WE, Schuster MM. Anorectal physiology and pathophysiology. Am J Gastroenterol 1987;82:487–97.
Coller JA. Clinical application of anorectal manometry. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1987;16:17–33.
Enck P, Kränzle U, Schwiese J, Dietz M, Erckenbrecht JF, Wienbeck M, Strohmeyer G. Biofeedback-Behandlung bei Stuhlinkontinenz. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1988;113:1789–94.
Kerremans R. Morphological and physiological aspects of anal continence and defaecation. Brussels: Arsica SA, 1969.
Schuster MM. Motor action of rectum and anal sphincter in continence and defecation. In: Handbook of physiology: section 6, alimentary canal: Vol IV. Motility. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society 1968:2121–40.
Sun WM, Read NW, Donnelly TC. Impaired internal anal sphincter in a subgroup of patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 1989;97:130–5.
Felt-Bersma RJ, Janssen JJ, Klinkenberg Knol EC, Hoitsma HW, Meuwissen SG. Soiling: anorectal function and results of treatment. Int J Color Dis 1989;4:37–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article includes parts of the doctoral thesis of Thomas Elmer.
About this article
Cite this article
Eckardt, V.F., Elmer, T. Reliability of anal pressure measurements. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 72–77 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050212
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050212