Skip to main content
Log in

Recovery of anal sphincter function after the ileoanal reservoir procedure in patients over the age of fifty

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to postoperatively assess the progression of anal sphincter function and clinical outcome in patients ≥50 years old (Group I) compared with those <50 years old (Group II). METHODS: Clinical data were assessed after ileostomy closure by a questionnaire. These data were compiled to obtain an incontinence score, which ranged from 0 (perfect continence) to 20 (total incontinence). Anorectal manometry was performed preoperatively (MN1) and postoperatively, before (MN2) and after (MN3) ileostomy closure. Wilcoxon and paired t-test were used to compare the clinical and functional results, respectively. RESULTS: Group I consisted of 22 patients (mean age, 56 years) and Group II, 50 patients (mean age, 32 years). No differences were found relative to either preoperative pressures or clinical outcome. However, both the mean and high resting pressures were significantly lower in Group I at the MN2 examination. CONCLUSION: The effect on anal sphincters of ileoanal reservoir in patients over the age of 50 years is similar to that noted in younger patients. Transient impairment of internal anal sphincter function observed after ileoanal reservoir is more severe in older patients (P=0.01). However, as in younger patients, it does completely recover after ileostomy closure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. BMJ 1978;2:85–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McHugh SM, Diamant NE, McLeod R, Cohen Z. S-pouchesvs. J-pouches: a comparison of functional outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:671–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pemberton JH, Kelly KA, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 1987;206:504–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Skarsgard ED, Atkinson KG, Bell GA, Pezim ME, Seal AM, Sharp FR. Function and quality of life results after ileal pouch surgery for chronic ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. Am J Surg 1989;175:467–71.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Horgan PG, O'Connell PR, Shinkwin CA, Kirwan WO. Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter Br J Surg 1989:76:783–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller R, Bartolo DC, Orrom WJ, Mortensen NJ, Roe AM, Cervero F. Improvement of anal sensation with preservation of anal transitional zone after ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:414–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liljeqvist L, Lindquist K, Ljungdahl I. Alterations in ileoanal pouch technique, 1980 to 1987: complications and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:929–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindquist K. Anal manometry with microtransducer technique before and after restorative proctocolectomy: sphincter function and clinical correlations. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:91–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keighley MR. Abdominal mucosectomy reduces the incidence of soiling and sphincter damage after restorative proctocolectomy and J-pouch. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:386–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tuckson W, Lavery I, Fazio V, Oakley J, Church J, Milsom J. Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg 1991;161:90–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heald RJ, Allen DR. Stapled ileoanal anastomosis: a technique to avoid mucosal proctectomy in the ileal pouch operation. Br J Surg 1986;73:571–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnston D, Holdsworth PJ, Nasmyth DG,et al. Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative procto-colectomy for ulcerative colitis: a pilot study comparing end-to-end ileoanal anastomosis without endo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1987;74:940–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lavery IC, Tuckson WB, Easley KA. Internal anal sphincter function after total abdominal colectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:950–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wexner SD, Jagelman DG. The double-stapled ileoanal reservoir. Perspect Colon Rectal Surg 1990;3:132–44.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wexner SD, James K, Jagelman DG. The double stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis: a prospective review of sphincter function and clinical outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:487–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bannister JJ, Abouzekry L, Read NW. Effect of aging on anorectal function. Gut 1987;28:353–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Laurberg S, Swash M. Effects of aging on the anorectal sphincters and their innervation. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:737–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis WG, Holdsworth DJ, Sagar PM, Johnston D. Restorative proctocolectomy (RP) with intact anal sphincter in patients over the age of fifty [meeting abstract]. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:P14.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Perry TG, Strong SA, Fazio VW,et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: is it ever too late [meeting abstract]? Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:P14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelman DG. The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:22–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ger GC, Wexner SD, Jorge JM, Salanga VD, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. The roles of anorectal manometry, electromyography and cinedefecography in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:816–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morgado PJ, Wexner SD, Jorge JM. Discrepancies in anal manometric pressure measurement: important or inconsequential? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:820–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wexner SD, Jagelman DG. The double-stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis (film and monograph). Woodbury: CineMed, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gardner E. Decrease in human motor neurones with age. Anat Rec 1940;77:529–36.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McHugh SM, Diamant NE. Effect of age, gender and parity on anal canal pressures: contribution of impaired anal sphincter function to fecal incontinence. Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:726–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Neill ME, Swash M. Increased motor unit fibre density in the external anal sphincter muscle in anorectal incontinence: a single fibre EMG study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980;43:343–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Percy JP, Neill ME, Kandiah TK, Swash M. A neurogenic factor in faecal incontinence in the elderly. Age Ageing 1982;11:175–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Burnett SJ, Bartram CI. Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991;6:2–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Klosterhalfen B, Offner F, Topf N, Vogel P, Mittermayer C. Sclerosis of the internal anal sphincter-a process of aging. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:606–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Jorge, J.M.N., Wexner, S.D., James, K. et al. Recovery of anal sphincter function after the ileoanal reservoir procedure in patients over the age of fifty. Dis Colon Rectum 37, 1002–1005 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049312

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049312

Key words

Navigation