Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Statistical models underlying the analysis of orientation data commonly assume a unimodal symmetric population, such as the circular normal distribution. If the sample distribution is skewed or bimodal, standard procedures usually produce misleading results. Where such situations occur, a mixture of two or more circular normal distributions may be used as the population model. The parameters describing each mode and the mixing proportion may be estimated by the method of maximum likelihood using numerical techniques. This approach is applied to a distinctly bimodal set of cross-bedding data from the Mississippian Salem Limestone of central Indiana.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowman, F., 1958, Introduction to Bessel functions: Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 135 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curray, J. R., 1956, The analysis of two-dimensional orientation data: Jour. Geology, v. 64, no. 2, p. 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. A., and Durand, D., 1955, The distribution of length and components of the sum of random unit vectors: Ann. Math. Stat., v. 26, p. 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel, E. J., Greenwood, J. A., and Durand, D., 1953, The circular normal distribution: Jour. Am. Stat. Assoc., v. 49, p. 267–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselblad, V., 1966, Estimation of parameters for a mixture of normal distributions: Technometrics, v. 8, p. 431–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. A., 1968, Statistical analysis of orientation data: Jour. Sed. Pet., v. 38, no. 1, p. 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. G., 1967, Handbook of numerical methods and applications: Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 354 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumbein, W. C., 1939, Preferred orientation of pebbles in sedimentary deposits: Jour. Geology, v. 47, no. 7, p. 673–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, B. W., 1960, Statistical theory: The Macmillan Company, New York, 427 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, H. J., 1953, The analysis of aggregates of orientation data in the earth sciences: Jour. Geology, v. 61, no. 6, p. 482–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, H. J., 1956, Some vector and arithmetic operations on two-dimensional orientation variates, with applications to geologic data: Jour. Geology, v. 64, no. 6, p. 533–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedimentation Seminar, 1966, Cross-bedding in the Salem Limestone of central Indiana: Sedimentology, v. 6, no. 2, p. 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, R., 1962, Analysis of vectorial data: Jour. Sed. Pet., v. 32, no. 4, p. 801–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, W. F., 1955, Paleogeographic reconstructions from cross-bedding studies: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 39, no. 12, p. 2471–2483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, W. F., 1959, The importance of modes in cross-bedding data: Jour. Sed. Pet., v. 29, no. 2, p. 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, T.A., James, W.R. Analysis of bimodal orientation data. Mathematical Geology 1, 129–135 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048557

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048557

Keywords

Navigation