Skip to main content
Log in

Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the efficacy and patient tolerance of standard orthograde bowel preparation using 4 liters of polyethylene glycol solution with only 2 liters of polyethylene glycol preceded by the stimulant laxative bisacodyl. METHODS: Three hundred eighty-two consecutive patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy under two surgeons over a six-month period were randomized to receive one of the two preparations. Patients were asked to record the effects of the preparation and to give it a “discomfort rating” on a scale from 1 to 5. Surgeons were blinded to the preparation used and rated the quality of bowel cleansing on a scale of 1 to 5. One hundred ninety-one patients were randomized to the 4-liter preparation and 191 to the 2-liter preparation. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of patients in the 2-liter group drank all of the solution as opposed to only 66 percent of patients in the 4-liter group. Patients in the 4-liter group gave the preparation significantly lower comfort scores than those in the 2-liter group (Fisher's exact test;P = 0.0001). The quality of bowel cleansing was not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.88). A total of 6.8 percent of the 2-liter group and 9.4 percent of the 4-liter group were considered by the surgeon to have had a poor preparation (rating 4 or 5). The quality of the preparation was found to correlate with the patients' age and compliance with the preparation regimen, and was found not to correlate with presenting symptoms, pathology, or a previous colonic resection. CONCLUSION: Bowel preparation with bisacodyl and 2 liters of polyethylene glycol is more acceptable to patients than a 4-liter regimen and is equally effective in cleansing the colon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis GR, Santa Ana CA, Morawski SG, Fordtran JS. Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion. Gastroenterology 1980;78:991–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burbige EJ, Bourke E, Tarder G. Effect of preparation for colonoscopy on fluid and electrolyte balance. Gastrointest Endosc 1978;24:286–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldman J, Reichelderfer M. Evaluation of a rapid colonoscopy preparation using a new gut lavage solution. Gastrointest Endosc 1982;28:9–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas G, Brozinsky S, Isenberg J. Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced salt lavage solution (Golytely®) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1982;82:435–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ernstoff J, DeGrasia H, Marshall J, Jumshyd A, McCullough G. A randomised blinded clinical trial of a rapid colonic lavage solution (Golytely®) compared with standard preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema. Gastroenterology 1983;84:1512–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beck DE, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG. Comparison of oral lavage methods for preoperative colonic cleansing. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:699–703.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vilien M, Rytkonen M. Golytely® preparation for colonoscopy: 1.5 liters is enough for outpatients. Endoscopy 1990;22:168–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hangartner PJ, Munch R, Meier J, Ammann R, Buhler H. Comparison of three colon cleansing methods: evaluation of a randomized clinical trial with 300 ambulatory patients. Endoscopy 1989;21:272–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Borkje B, Pederson G, Lund GM, Enehaug JS, Berstad A. Effectiveness and acceptability of three bowel cleansing regimens. Scand J Gastroenterol 1991;26:162–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rings EH, Mulder CJ, Tytgat GN. The effect of bisacodyl on whole-gut irrigation in preparation for colonoscopy. Endoscopy 1989;21:172–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brady CE, Dipalma JA, Beck DE. Effect of bisacodyl on gut lavage cleansing for colonoscopy. Ann Clin Res 1987;19:34–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Davis GR, Santa Ana CA, Morawski SG, Fordtran JS. Development of a lavage solution associated with minimum water and electrolyte absorption or secretion. Gastroenterology 1980;78:991–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McConnel TH. Fatal hypocalcemia from phosphates absorption from laxative preparations. JAMA 1971;216:147–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burbige EJ, Bourke E, Tarder G. Effect of preparation for colonoscopy on fluid and electrolyte balance. Gastrointest Endosc 1978;24:286–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, W.J., Meagher, A.P., Lubowski, D.Z. et al. Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum 37, 229–234 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048160

Key words

Navigation