Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease: A prospective, randomized comparison of cold scalpelvs. contact Nd:YAG laser

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, laser technology has been advocated for the treatment of hemorrhoids. However, there has been little scientific evaluation of the use of the Nd:YAG laser for excisional treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. The purpose of this study was to perform a prospective randomized study of the Nd:YAG laser vs. scalpel excision, when performing a standard Ferguson-closed hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: Patients presenting for internal-external hemorrhoidectomy were eligible for study. Hemorrhoidectomies were performed under epidural or caudal blocks. The standard Ferguson closed hemorrhoidectomy technique was used. Data evaluated included: age, sex, estimated blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain scores, postoperative analgesic use, wound healing, and time for return to work. Eighty-six patients were eligible for study (laser, N=51; scalpel, N=35). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups, except for a greater degree of wound inflammation and dehiscence at the 10 day postoperative visit for the laser group (laser, 1.7±.2; scalpel, 0.8±.2;P <0.05,t-test). The use of the Nd:YAG laser added $480 per case; as a result, the treatment cost for the laser group was $15,360 higher than that of the conventional group. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that there are no patient care advantages associated with the use of the Nd:YAG laser for excisional hemorrhoidectomy compared with scalpel excision. As new technology becomes available, surgeons must rigorously assess therapeutic efficacy and cost-benefit ratio before deciding to employ this technology for patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banov L. The Chester Beatty medical papyrus: the earliest known treatise completely devoted to anorectal diseases. Surgery 1965;58:1037–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Parks AG. De Haemorrhoids. Guy's Hosp Rep 1955;104:135–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lord PH. A new regime for treatment of hemorrhoids. J R Soc Med 1968;61:935–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dennison AR, Wherry DC, Morris DL. Hemorrhoids: nonoperative management. Techniques of colorectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1988;68:1401–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sankar MY, Joffe SN. Laser surgery in colonic and anorectal lesions. Surg Clin North Am 1988;68:1447–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lockhart-Mummery JP. Diseases of rectum and colon. 2nd ed. London: Bailliere, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Milligan ET, Morgan C, Naunton Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of anal canal and operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet 1937;2:1119–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miles WE. Rectal surgery. London: Cassell, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parks AG. Surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1956;43:337–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell AB. A simple method of operating on piles. BMJ 1903;1:482.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson JA, Heaton JR. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1959;2:176–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitehead W. Surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. BMJ 1882;1:148–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson HG. The after results of the operative treatment of hemorrhoids. BMJ 1909;2:1276–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blaisdell PC. Prevention of massive hemorrhage secondary to hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1958;106:485–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barron J. Office ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Am J Surg 1963;105:563–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis MI. Diverse methods of managing hemorrhoids: cryohemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1973;10:175–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lloyd-Williams K, Haq IU, Glem B. Cryodestruction of hemorrhoids. BMJ 1973;1:666–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leicester RJ, Nicholls RJ, Mann CV. Infrared coagulation in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Gut 1981;22:436.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Iwagaki H, Higuchi Y, Fuchimoto S, Orita K. The laser treatment of hemorrhoids: results of a study on 1816 patients. Jpn J Surg 1989;19:658–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirshenbaum G, Snyder A. Surgical laser technologies. Clinical procedures review. April 1990: Number 3.

  21. Muldoon JP. The completely closed hemorrhoidectomy: a reliable and trusted friend for 25 years. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;23:211–4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kilbride MJ, Senagore AJ, Mazier WP, Ferguson C, Ufkes T. Epidural analgesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:137–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barron J. Office ligation treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1963;6:109–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wroblewski DR, Corman ML, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA. Long-term evaluation of rubber ring ligation in hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:478–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lau WY, Chow HP, Poon GP, Wong SH. Rubber band ligation of three primary hemorrhoids in a single session. A safe and effective procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:336–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Marshman D, Huber PJ Jr, Timmerman W, Simonton CT, Odom FC, Kaplan ER. Hemorrhoid ligation: a review of efficacy. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:369–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jensen SL, Harling H, Arseth P, Tange A. The natural history of symptomatic hemorrhoids. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:41–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leicester RJ, Nicholls RJ, Mann CV. Infrared coagulation: a new treatment for hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:602–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ambrose NS, Morris D, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. A randomized trial of photocoagulation or injection sclerotherapy for the treatment of first- and second-degree hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:238–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Templeton JL, Spence RA, Kennedy TL, MacKenzie G, Hanna WA. Comparison of infrered coagulation and rubber band ligation for first- and second-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized prospective clinical trial. BMJ 1983;286:1387–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hinton CP, Morris DL. A randomized trial comparing direct current therapy and bipolar diathermy in the out-patient treatment of third-degree hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:931–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Alexander-Williams J, Crapp AR. Conservative management of hemorrhoids. Clin Gastroenterol 1975;4:595–601.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Senapati A, Nicholls RJ. Randomized trial to compare the results of injection sclerotherapy with a bulk laxative alone in the treatment of bleeding hemorrhoids. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:124–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith LE, Goodreau JJ, Fouty WJ. Operative hemorrhoidectomyversus cryodestruction. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:10–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Greca F, Haves NM, Nevah E,et al. A randomized trial to compare rubber band ligation with phenol injection treatment for hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1985;72:741–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sim AJ, Murie JA, Mackenzie I. Three year follow up study on the treatment of first and second degree hemorrhoids by sclerosant injection or rubber band ligation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;157:534–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lewis AA, Rogers HS, Leighton M. Trial of maximal anal dilatation, cryotherapy and elastic band ligation as laternative to hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of large prolapsing hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1983;70:54–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Khoury GA, Lake SP, Lewis MC,et al. A randomized trial to compare single with multiple phenol injection treatment for hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1985;72:741–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fansler WA, Anderson JK. A plastic operation for certain types of hemorrhoids. JAMA 1993;101:1064–6.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Milligan ET, Morgan CH, Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal, and the operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet 1987;2:1119–24.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Eddy HJ, Yu JC, Eddy EC. Dual laser hemorrhoidectomy (abstr.). Lasers Surg Med 1986;6:201.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dwyer R. The technique of gastrointestinal laser endoscopy. The biomedical laser. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981:255–69.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wang JY, Chang-Chien CR, Chen JS,et al. The role of lasers in hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:78–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Francisco, California, June 12 to 17, 1992. Winner of the New England Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Award.

About this article

Cite this article

Senagore, A., Mazier, W.P., Luchtefeld, M.A. et al. Treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease: A prospective, randomized comparison of cold scalpelvs. contact Nd:YAG laser. Dis Colon Rectum 36, 1042–1049 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047297

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047297

Key words

Navigation