Abstract
PURPOSE: Recently, laser technology has been advocated for the treatment of hemorrhoids. However, there has been little scientific evaluation of the use of the Nd:YAG laser for excisional treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. The purpose of this study was to perform a prospective randomized study of the Nd:YAG laser vs. scalpel excision, when performing a standard Ferguson-closed hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: Patients presenting for internal-external hemorrhoidectomy were eligible for study. Hemorrhoidectomies were performed under epidural or caudal blocks. The standard Ferguson closed hemorrhoidectomy technique was used. Data evaluated included: age, sex, estimated blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain scores, postoperative analgesic use, wound healing, and time for return to work. Eighty-six patients were eligible for study (laser, N=51; scalpel, N=35). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups, except for a greater degree of wound inflammation and dehiscence at the 10 day postoperative visit for the laser group (laser, 1.7±.2; scalpel, 0.8±.2;P <0.05,t-test). The use of the Nd:YAG laser added $480 per case; as a result, the treatment cost for the laser group was $15,360 higher than that of the conventional group. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that there are no patient care advantages associated with the use of the Nd:YAG laser for excisional hemorrhoidectomy compared with scalpel excision. As new technology becomes available, surgeons must rigorously assess therapeutic efficacy and cost-benefit ratio before deciding to employ this technology for patient care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banov L. The Chester Beatty medical papyrus: the earliest known treatise completely devoted to anorectal diseases. Surgery 1965;58:1037–43.
Parks AG. De Haemorrhoids. Guy's Hosp Rep 1955;104:135–56.
Lord PH. A new regime for treatment of hemorrhoids. J R Soc Med 1968;61:935–6.
Dennison AR, Wherry DC, Morris DL. Hemorrhoids: nonoperative management. Techniques of colorectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1988;68:1401–9.
Sankar MY, Joffe SN. Laser surgery in colonic and anorectal lesions. Surg Clin North Am 1988;68:1447–69.
Lockhart-Mummery JP. Diseases of rectum and colon. 2nd ed. London: Bailliere, 1934.
Milligan ET, Morgan C, Naunton Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of anal canal and operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet 1937;2:1119–24.
Miles WE. Rectal surgery. London: Cassell, 1949.
Parks AG. Surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1956;43:337–51.
Mitchell AB. A simple method of operating on piles. BMJ 1903;1:482.
Ferguson JA, Heaton JR. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1959;2:176–9.
Whitehead W. Surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. BMJ 1882;1:148–50.
Anderson HG. The after results of the operative treatment of hemorrhoids. BMJ 1909;2:1276–9.
Blaisdell PC. Prevention of massive hemorrhage secondary to hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1958;106:485–8.
Barron J. Office ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Am J Surg 1963;105:563–70.
Lewis MI. Diverse methods of managing hemorrhoids: cryohemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1973;10:175–7.
Lloyd-Williams K, Haq IU, Glem B. Cryodestruction of hemorrhoids. BMJ 1973;1:666–8.
Leicester RJ, Nicholls RJ, Mann CV. Infrared coagulation in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Gut 1981;22:436.
Iwagaki H, Higuchi Y, Fuchimoto S, Orita K. The laser treatment of hemorrhoids: results of a study on 1816 patients. Jpn J Surg 1989;19:658–61.
Kirshenbaum G, Snyder A. Surgical laser technologies. Clinical procedures review. April 1990: Number 3.
Muldoon JP. The completely closed hemorrhoidectomy: a reliable and trusted friend for 25 years. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;23:211–4.
Kilbride MJ, Senagore AJ, Mazier WP, Ferguson C, Ufkes T. Epidural analgesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:137–40.
Barron J. Office ligation treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1963;6:109–13.
Wroblewski DR, Corman ML, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA. Long-term evaluation of rubber ring ligation in hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:478–82.
Lau WY, Chow HP, Poon GP, Wong SH. Rubber band ligation of three primary hemorrhoids in a single session. A safe and effective procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:336–9.
Marshman D, Huber PJ Jr, Timmerman W, Simonton CT, Odom FC, Kaplan ER. Hemorrhoid ligation: a review of efficacy. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:369–71.
Jensen SL, Harling H, Arseth P, Tange A. The natural history of symptomatic hemorrhoids. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:41–4.
Leicester RJ, Nicholls RJ, Mann CV. Infrared coagulation: a new treatment for hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:602–5.
Ambrose NS, Morris D, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. A randomized trial of photocoagulation or injection sclerotherapy for the treatment of first- and second-degree hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:238–40.
Templeton JL, Spence RA, Kennedy TL, MacKenzie G, Hanna WA. Comparison of infrered coagulation and rubber band ligation for first- and second-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized prospective clinical trial. BMJ 1983;286:1387–9.
Hinton CP, Morris DL. A randomized trial comparing direct current therapy and bipolar diathermy in the out-patient treatment of third-degree hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:931–2.
Alexander-Williams J, Crapp AR. Conservative management of hemorrhoids. Clin Gastroenterol 1975;4:595–601.
Senapati A, Nicholls RJ. Randomized trial to compare the results of injection sclerotherapy with a bulk laxative alone in the treatment of bleeding hemorrhoids. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:124–6.
Smith LE, Goodreau JJ, Fouty WJ. Operative hemorrhoidectomyversus cryodestruction. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:10–16.
Greca F, Haves NM, Nevah E,et al. A randomized trial to compare rubber band ligation with phenol injection treatment for hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1985;72:741–2.
Sim AJ, Murie JA, Mackenzie I. Three year follow up study on the treatment of first and second degree hemorrhoids by sclerosant injection or rubber band ligation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;157:534–6.
Lewis AA, Rogers HS, Leighton M. Trial of maximal anal dilatation, cryotherapy and elastic band ligation as laternative to hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of large prolapsing hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1983;70:54–6.
Khoury GA, Lake SP, Lewis MC,et al. A randomized trial to compare single with multiple phenol injection treatment for hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1985;72:741–2.
Fansler WA, Anderson JK. A plastic operation for certain types of hemorrhoids. JAMA 1993;101:1064–6.
Milligan ET, Morgan CH, Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal, and the operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet 1987;2:1119–24.
Eddy HJ, Yu JC, Eddy EC. Dual laser hemorrhoidectomy (abstr.). Lasers Surg Med 1986;6:201.
Dwyer R. The technique of gastrointestinal laser endoscopy. The biomedical laser. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981:255–69.
Wang JY, Chang-Chien CR, Chen JS,et al. The role of lasers in hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:78–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Francisco, California, June 12 to 17, 1992. Winner of the New England Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Award.
About this article
Cite this article
Senagore, A., Mazier, W.P., Luchtefeld, M.A. et al. Treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease: A prospective, randomized comparison of cold scalpelvs. contact Nd:YAG laser. Dis Colon Rectum 36, 1042–1049 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047297
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047297