Abstract
The development of the pertussis vaccine production in the National Institute of Public Health in the Netherlands since 1953, and the results with the consecutive lots of vaccine in the mouse protection test and the U.S.A. toxicity test are described. The results in the latter test are compared with the results of a locally developed guinea pig toxicity test. Special attention is given to the difficulties encountered when the U.S.A. toxicity test is used for adsorbed DPT vaccines. The potency data of all lots of DPT vaccines produced since 1958 fall within the limits of the potency test as prescribed in the U.S.A. Minimum Requirements. There are indications that the increased potency of the vaccine may have led to a lower mortality rate of pertussis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bos, G. J. 1960. Een epidemie van kinkhoest in een redelijk gevaccineerde huisartsenpraktijk. Huisarts en Wetenschap3: 293–297.
Cohen, H. H., andLeppink G. J. 1956. Selection ofHemophilus pertussis strains for vaccine production in the mouse protection test in a balanced design. J. Immunol.77: 299–304.
Cohen, H. H. 1958. Establishment of a dried standard pertussis vaccine. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek24: 33–48.
Cohen, H. H. 1962. Discussion on the preparation of a semipurified protective antigen ofBordetella pertussis in connection with side effects and the serological response after vaccination and disease. Round Table Conference on Pertussis Immunization, Prague, Vol. 1, 97–103.
van Hemert, P. andCohen, H. H. 1962. Development of agglutinogens, protective antigens and histamine sensitizing factor during continuous culture. Round Table Conference on Pertussis Immunization, Prague, Vol. 1, 24–29.
Joo, I., Pusztai, Z. andJuhász, V. P. 1961a. Histamine-sensitizing activity of various pertussis vaccines. Immun. Forsch.121: 143–158.
Joo, I., Pusztai, Z. andJuhász, V. P. 1961b. Comparative investigations into the mouse-protective potency, histamine-sensitizing activity and agglutinin-producing ability of pertussis vaccines. Immun. Forsch.121: 250–266.
Munoz, J., Ribi, E. andLarson, C. L. 1959. Antigens ofBordetella pertussis. I. Activities of cell walls and protoplasm. J. Immunol.83: 496–501.
Piersma, H. D. 1962. Recent laboratory experience in the U.S.A. with the pertussis toxicity test. Round Table Conference on Pertussis Immunization, Prague, Vol. 1, 111–119.
Pittman, M., 1951. Comparison of the histamine-sensitizing property with the protective activity of pertussis vaccines for mice. J. infect. Dis.89: 300–304.
Preston, N. W. 1959. Factors influencing the assay of the histamine-sensitising factor ofHaemophilus pertussis. J. Path. Bact.78: 217–224.
Report to the Whooping-cough Immunization Committee of the Medical Research Council, 1956. Vaccination against whooping-cough. Brit. Med. J.II: 454–462.
Smeenk, C. S. 1952. Resultaat van de kinkhoest-immunisatie bij zuigelingen. Ned. T. Geneesk.96: 1812–1814.
Spronk, M. G. 1951. Actieve immunisatie tegen kinkhoest. Thesis. Amsterdam.
Sutherland, I. W. 1962. The cell wall ofBordetella pertussis as a protective antigen. Round Table Conference on Immunization, Prague, Vol. 1, 72–80.
Tasman, A. 1959. Het verband tussen de aard van de gebruikte entstof, de wijze van inspuiten en de ent-reacties na immunisatie tegen kinkhoest, difterie en tetanus. Ned. T. Geneesk.103: 1049–1057.
Verwey, W. F., Thiele, E. H., Sage, D. N. andSchuchardt, L. F. 1949. A simplified liquid culture medium for the growth ofHemophilus pertussis. J. Bacteriol.58: 127–134.
Vos, A. J. 1961. Een beschouwing over de preventieve waarde van het kinkhoestvaccin naar aanleiding van een onderzoek in een algemene praktijk. Huisarts en Wetenschap4: 114–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, H.H. Development of pertussis vaccine production and control in the National Institute of Public Health in the Netherlands during the years 1950–1962. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 29, 183–201 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02046052
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02046052