Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of specific activity and a possible universal unit for its definition

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing importance of specific activity is reviewed. It concerns especially surface phenomena, toxicity, labelling of radiopharmaceuticals, isotope exchange, enzymatic and pharmacological ligand-receptor reactions. The present state of evaluating the specific activity has been analyzed. Introduction of the coefficient DCF (deviation from true carrier free state) is proposed as a possibility for universal declaration of the specific activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. PROKOP, K. SVOBODA, F. BUDSKÝ, Proc. IV. Intern. Symp. Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, Jülich, 1982, p. 291; J. Label. Comp. Radiopharm., 19 (1982) 1563.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. MARHOLD, Review of Industrial Toxicology (in Czech), SZN-publishing-house, Prague, 1964, p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  3. O. RIEDL, V. VONDRÁČEK, Clinical Toxicology (in Czech), Avicenum, Prague, 1980, p. 471.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. HUŠÁK, J. VLČEK, Intern. J. Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 30 (1979) 165.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. C. SRIVASTAVA, G. MEINKEN, T. D. SMITH, P. RICHARDS, Intern. J. Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 28 (1977) 83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. HOUDEK, I. OBRUSNÍK, K. SVOBODA, Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett., 39 (1979) 343.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. SVOBODA, V. HUŠÁK, J. VLČEK, F. HOUDEK, J. Labell. Comp. Radiopharmaceuticals, 16 (1979) 122.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. MATTSSON J. Radioanal. Chem., 45 (1978) 341.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. DEUTSCH, W. R. HEINEMAN, J. P. ZODDA, T. W. GILBERT, C. C. WILLIAMS, Intern. J. Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 33 (1982) 843.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. BERGER, D. COMAR, J. SASTRE, C. PRENAUT, C. KELLERSOHN, Proc. 3rd World Congress on Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Paris, 1982, p. 2143.

  11. J. TÖLGYESSY, T. BRAUN, M. KYRŠ, Isotope Dilution Analysis, Pergamon, Oxford, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. KYRŠ, J. TÖLGYESSY, G. N. BILIMOVIČ, J. KRTIL, L. KUČA, New Methods of Radioanalytical Chemistry (in Russian), Energoizdat, Moscow, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. FRIEDLENDER, J. KENNEDY, Introduction to Radiochemistry (Russian version), Moscow, 1952, p. 290.

  14. I. P. ALIMARIN, K. F. SVOBODA, Atomnaya Energiya, 5 (1958) 73.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. SVOBODA, Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun., 28 (1963) 1338.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. SVOBODA, Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun., 29 (1964) 1513.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. SVOBODA, Nature, 198 (1963) 986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. SVOBODA, Isotopenpraxis, 8 (1972) 351.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. SVOBODA, Rept. Nucl. Res. Inst., Řež, ÚJV-2712-Ch, 1971.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Svoboda, K. Significance of specific activity and a possible universal unit for its definition. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Articles 88, 13–29 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02037300

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02037300

Keywords

Navigation