Abstract
Experiments using ‘naive” females established differences in host specificity among geographic strains of the seed beetleCallosobruchus maculatus; some females strongly preferred azuki bean over mung bean, and others failed to discriminate between the two hosts. We examined whether such congenital differences affect the degree to which host preference can be modified by experience. In choice tests, previous exposure to azuki bean increased the proportion of eggs laid on that host, but only in strains with a relatively low host specificity. Under more realistic, no-choice conditions, egg-laying experience affected oviposition rates mostly in strains with a high host specificity, but these experiments could not distinguish between the effects of a female's experience per se and her physiological state (i.e., egg load). Our results indicate that the likelihood of detecting an effect of experience on host choice depends on both the experimental protocol and the source of the test population. In natural populations ofC. maculatus, recent egg-laying experience probably plays little or no role in discrimination between host species but may influence discrimination between conspecific seeds that differ in quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernays, E. A. (1993). Aversion learning and feeding. In Papaj, D. R., and Lewis, A. C. (eds.),Insect Learning, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 1–17.
Courtney, S. P., Chen, G. K., and Gardner, A. (1989). A general model for individual host selection.Oikos 55: 55–65.
Credland, P. F., and Wright, A. W. (1988). The effect of artificial substrates and host extracts on oviposition byCallosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae).J. Stored Prod. Res. 24: 157–164.
Fox, C. W. (1993). A quantitative genetic analysis of oviposition preference and larval performance on two hosts in the bruchid beetle,Callosobruchus maculatus.Evolution 47: 166–175.
Hoffmann, A. A. (1985). Effects of experience on oviposition and attraction inDrosophila: Comparing apples and organes.Am. Nat. 126: 41–51.
Jaenike, J. (1988). Effects of early adult experience on host selection in insects: some experimental and theoretical results.J. Insect Behav. 1: 3–15.
Jaenike, J. (1990). Host specialization in phytophagous insects.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 243–273.
Mark, G. A. (1982). Induced oviposition preference, periodic environments, and demographic cycles in the bruchid beetleCallosobruchus maculatus.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 32: 155–160.
Messina, F. J. (1993). Heritability and “evolvability” of fitness components in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus.Heredity 71: 623–629.
Messina, F. J., and Mitchell, R. (1989). Intraspecific variation in the egg-spacing behavior of the seed beetleCallosobruchus maculatus.J. Insect Behav. 2: 727–741.
Messina, F. J., Barmore, J. L., and Renwick, J. A. A. (1987a). Host selection by ovipositing cowpea weevils: Patterning of input from separate sense organs.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 43: 169–173.
Messina, F. J., Barmore, J. L., and Renwick, J. A. A. (1987b). Oviposition deterrent from eggs ofCallosobruchus maculatus: Spacing mechanism or artifact?J. Chem. Ecol. 13: 219–226.
Messina, F. J., Kemp, J. L., and Dickinson, J. A. (1992). Plasticity in the egg-spacing behavior of a seed beetle: Effects of host deprivation and seed patchiness (Coleoptera: Bruchidae).J. Insect Behav. 5: 609–621.
Mitchell, R. (1975). The evolution of oviposition tactics in the bean weevil,Callosobruchus maculatus (F.).Ecology 56: 696–702.
Mitchell, R. (1991). The traits of a biotype ofCallosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) from south India.J. Stored Prod. Res. 27: 221–224.
Papaj, D. R. (1986). Interpopulation differences in host preference and the evolution of learning in the butterfly,Battus philenor.Evolution 40: 518–530.
Papaj, D. R., and Prokopy, R. J. (1989). Ecological and evolutionary aspects of learning in phytophagous insects.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34: 315–350.
Papaj, D. R., Prokopy, R. J., McDonald, P. T., and Wong, T. T. Y. (1987). Differences in learning between wild and laboratoryCeratitis capitata flies.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 45: 65–72.
Prokopy, R. J., Cooley, S. S., and Papaj, D. R. (1993). How well can relative specialistRhagoletis flies learn to discriminate fruit for oviposition?J. Insect Behav. 6: 167–176.
Rausher, M. D. (1983). Conditioning and genetic variation as causes of individual variation in the oviposition behaviour of the tortoise beetle,Deloyala guttata.Anim. Behav. 37: 743–747.
Rosenheim, J. A. (1993). Comparative and experimental approaches to understanding insect learning. In Papaj, D. R., and Lewis, A. C. (eds.),Insect Learning, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 273–307.
Rosenheim, J. A., and Rosen, D. (1991). Foraging and oviposition decisions in the parasitoidAphytis lingnanensis: Distinguishing the influences of egg load and experience.J. Amin. Ecol. 60: 873–893.
Singer, M. C. (1986). The definition and measurement of oviposition preference. In Miller, J. R., and Miller, T. A. (eds.),Plant-Insect Interactions, Springer, New York, pp. 65–94.
Singer, M. C., Ng, D., Vasco, D., and Thomas, C. D. (1992). Rapidly evolving associations among oviposition preferences fail to constrain evolution of insect diet.Am. Nat. 139: 9–20.
Szentesi, A., and Jermy, T. (1990). The role of experience in host plant choice by phytophagous insects. In Bernays, E. A. (ed.),Insect-Plant Interactions, Vol. II, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 39–74.
Thanthianga, C., and Mitchell, R. (1990). The fecundity and oviposition behavior of a South Indian strain ofCallosobruchus maculatus.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 57: 133–142.
Via, S. (1986). Quantitative genetic analysis of feeding and oviposition behavior in the polyphagous leafminerLiriomyza sativae. In Huettel, M. D. (ed.),Evolutionary Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 185–196.
Via, S. (1990). Ecological genetics and host adaptation in herbivorous insects: The experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 421–426.
Wasserman, S. S. (1981). Host-induced oviposition preferences and oviposition markers in the cowpea weevil,Callosobruchus maculatus.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 74: 242–245.
Wasserman, S. S. (1986). Genetic variation in adaptation to foodplants among populations of the southern cowpea weevil,Callosobruchus maculatus: Evolution of oviposition preference.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 42: 201–212.
Wasserman, S. S., and Futuyma, D. J. (1981). Evolution of host plant utilization in laboratory populations of the southern cowpea weevil,Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Bruchidae).Evolution 35: 605–617.
Wilkinson, L. (1988).SYSTAT: The System for Statistics, Systat, Evanston, IL.
Wilson, K. (1988). Egg laying decisions by the bean weevilCallosobruchus maculatus.Ecol. Entomol. 13: 107–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiu, Yj., Messina, F.J. Effect of experience on host preference inCallosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): Variability among populations. J Insect Behav 7, 503–515 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025446
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025446